Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

ATI Mobility Radeon 9200

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon 9200

The ATI Mobility 9200 is a higher clocked ATI Mobility Radeon 9000. The difference is only the higher chip clock (250 MHz, compared to 240 MHz) and the support for 8x AGP (compared to 4x AGP).

The DirectX 8.1 capable graphic card for laptops presented good performance data at the date of introduction. The speed can be compared with the desktop version, which is clocked similarly. The ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 was the competitor of the GeForce 4 Go 460, which was sometimes faster and slower. Older games like Max Payne run sufficiently fast with this chip (more than 35 images per second). At moment, the performance can only be compared with integrated graphic cards (like GMA 950).

At moment, no Windows Vista Aero drivers are available for the ATI Mobility Radeon 9200.

ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

► remove from comparison ATI Mobility Radeon 9000

The AMD / ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 was the first DirectX 8.1 capable graphic card for laptops and offered a good gaming performance at the date of the market introduction in 2002. The speed can be compared with the desktop version, which is similarly clocked. The ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 was the competitor to the GeForce 4 Go 460 and similar fast. Older games like Max Payne run sufficiently fast with this chip (more than 35 images by second). At moment, the performance can only be compared with integrated graphic cards (like GMA 950).

At moment, there are no Windows Vista Aero drivers available for the ATI Mobility Radeon 9000.

show full text
ATI Mobility Radeon 9200ATI Mobility Radeon 9000
Mobility Radeon 9000 Series
Mobility Radeon 9200 4/1 cores @ 0.25 GHz128 Bit @ 200 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 4/1 cores @ 0.24 GHz128 Bit @ 200 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9200 4/1 cores @ 0.25 GHz128 Bit @ 200 MHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 4/1 cores @ 0.24 GHz128 Bit @ 200 MHz
CodenameM9M9
Pipelines4 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed250 MHz240 MHz
Memory Speed200 MHz200 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRDDR
Max. Amount of Memory64 MB128 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 8.1, Shader 1.4DirectX 8.1, Shader 1.4
Transistors30 Million30 Million
technology150 nm150 nm
FeaturesAGP 8x, 150nm processing technology, 952 MPixel/s pixel-filling rate, theoretical filling rate: 9601000 Mpixel/s, memory bandwidth: 64007040 MB/s, Hyper-Z II optimization for memory bandwidth, Smoothvision: Super Sampling FSAA, Powerplay (not activated in all laptops!), integrated MPEG2 decoder-units like iDCT, Motion Compensation, hardware sub-picture-decoder, adaptive de-interlacing, 400 MHz RAMDAC, 165 MHz TMDS-transmitter, integrated video-exit, support for several display devices by ATi Hydravision (up to 3 displays simultaneously).AGP 4x, 150nm processing technology, 952 MPixel/s pixel-filling rate, theoretical filling rate: 9601000 Mpixel/s, memory bandwidth: 64007040 MB/s, Hyper-Z II optimization for memory bandwidth, Smoothvision: Super Sampling FSAA, Powerplay (not activated in all laptops!), integrated MPEG2 decoder-units like iDCT, Motion Compensation, hardware sub-picture-decoder, adaptive de-interlacing, 400 MHz RAMDAC, 165 MHz TMDS-transmitter, integrated video-exit, support for several display devices by ATi Hydravision (up to 3 displays simultaneously).
Date of Announcement01.03.2003 01.09.2002

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
7670 Points (8%)
5565 Points (6%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
1230 Points (1%)
832 Points (0%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 → 70% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 05:43:21

#0 checking url part for id 63 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 62 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.165s ... 0.166s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.166s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.166s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 63 +0.028s ... 0.194s

#8 got single benchmarks 63 +0.012s ... 0.206s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 62 +0.002s ... 0.208s

#10 got single benchmarks 62 +0.007s ... 0.215s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.215s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.225s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.225s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.227s

#15 return log +0.063s ... 0.291s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)