Mediatek MT6582 vs Mediatek MT6592

Mediatek MT6582

► remove MT6582

The Mediatek MT6582 is a system-on-a-chip (SoC) for low-cost tablets and smartphones. It is manufactured in 28 nm and offers a quad-core Cortex-A7 processor as well as an ARM Mali-400 MP2 GPU clocked at 500 MHz (according to Wikipedia the main difference to the MT6582M that is clocked at 416 MHz). Furthermore, the chip supports dual SIM, UMTS and HSPA+, WiFi, FM, Bluetooth and GPS. 

The CPU performance of the MT6582 is similar to other Cortex-A7 SoCs clocked at the same frequency. Depending on the benchmark, the CPU power is roughly comparable with the Nvidia Tegra 3 and sufficient for everyday applications such as browsing. The GPU will handle only simple Android games in moderate resolutions.

Mediatek MT6592

► remove MT6592

The MediaTek MT6592 is a mid-range 28 nm SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. It was announced near the end of 2013 and is manufactured in 28 nm. It includes 8 Cortex-A7 processor cores that are typically clocked up to 1.7 - 2.0 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates an ARM Mali-450 GPU at 700 MHz, WLAN, a video decoder for up to 4K content, a LPDDR3 memory controller at 666 MHz, and a 2G/3G (UMTS/HSPA+) radio.

Although the MT6592 offers eight relatively high clocked CPU cores compared to other SoCs, its performance in day-to-day usage is a bit lower, as the Cortex-A7 cores offer slower performance per clock and only a few apps are able to make use of all 8 cores simultaneously. Modern dual-core (e.g., Apple A7) or quad-core (e.g., Cortex A15 or Snapdragon 800) SoCs can be clearly faster in everyday scenarios.

The integrated ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU offers 4 graphics clusters that are clocked at a high 700 MHz. However, the performance of the GPU is somewhat below that of a Tegra 4 or Adreno 320. Also like the Nvidia rival, the Mali-450 lacks support for OpenGL ES 3.0.

Mediatek MT6582Mediatek MT6592
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A7Cortex-A7
: Mediatek Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT65921700 - 2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT8127 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589T (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8389 (compare)1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8125 (compare)1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8321 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8121 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
» Mediatek MT65821300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582M (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6580M (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589 (compare)1200 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT6572 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
» Mediatek MT65921700 - 2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT8127 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589T (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8389 (compare)1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8125 (compare)1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8321 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8121 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT65821300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582M (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6580M (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589 (compare)1200 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT6572 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
1300 MHz1700 - 2000 MHz
128 KB512 KB
512 KB1 MB
4 / 48 / 8
28 28
Mali-400 MP2 @ 500 MHz, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, FMUMTS/HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, WiFi (802.11n), 666 MHz LPDDR3, 16 MP Camera ISP, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, GPS, NFC, ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 700 MHz
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP2 (500 MHz)ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz)
Mediatek MT6582 Mediatek MT6592

3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 5464     avg: 7683     median: 7811 (5%)     max: 8382 Points
min: 5508     avg: 8551     median: 9246 (6%)     max: 10060 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 5536     avg: 7724     median: 7861 (9%)     max: 8383 Points
min: 5182     avg: 9113     median: 9762 (12%)     max: 10293 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 7473     avg: 8449     median: 8628 (10%)     max: 9037 Points
min: 5713     avg: 10577     median: 11158 (13%)     max: 12604 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
min: 371     avg: 375     median: 375 (3%)     max: 379 Points
430 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
min: 962     avg: 992     median: 992 (9%)     max: 1022 Points
966 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
min: 2105     avg: 2122     median: 2121.5 (4%)     max: 2138 Points
4185 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
min: 1249     avg: 1251     median: 1251 (3%)     max: 1253 Points
2458 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
min: 1403     avg: 1416     median: 1416 (4%)     max: 1429 Points
2561 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 891     avg: 1145     median: 1169.5 (2%)     max: 1200 Points
min: 1344     avg: 2350     median: 2390 (4%)     max: 2847 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 347     avg: 355     median: 353 (7%)     max: 366 Points
min: 262     avg: 438     median: 445 (9%)     max: 526 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
1191 Points (2%)
min: 1922     avg: 2135     median: 2134.5 (3%)     max: 2347 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
364 Points (7%)
min: 357     avg: 398     median: 398 (8%)     max: 439 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Multi Thread
min: 110     avg: 216     median: 230 (8%)     max: 289.805 MFLOPS
min: 241.989     avg: 295     median: 292.8 (10%)     max: 350 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Single Thread
min: 52     avg: 87.8     median: 88.9 (9%)     max: 115.952 MFLOPS
min: 118.576     avg: 144     median: 143.9 (14%)     max: 171 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 14998.7     avg: 17878     median: 15823.1 (27%)     max: 28995.5 ms
min: 11338.2     avg: 14383     median: 14278 (24%)     max: 19204.8 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1361.1     avg: 1654     median: 1578.1 (17%)     max: 2148.7 ms
min: 904.2     avg: 1338     median: 1182 (13%)     max: 2016 ms
Sunspider - 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 832     avg: 1517     median: 1606.2 (15%)     max: 1939.3 ms
min: 1396.2     avg: 1617     median: 1616.8 (15%)     max: 1837.4 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 894     avg: 2044     median: 2105 (4%)     max: 2452 Points
min: 1895     avg: 2511     median: 2563.5 (5%)     max: 3085 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Metal
min: 634     avg: 699     median: 713 (19%)     max: 740 Points
min: 696     avg: 796     median: 817 (22%)     max: 853 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta
min: 1110     avg: 1201     median: 1210 (27%)     max: 1273 Points
min: 1254     avg: 1456     median: 1503.5 (33%)     max: 1562 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Browser
min: 1528     avg: 1743     median: 1691 (22%)     max: 2102 Points
min: 871     avg: 1559     median: 1694 (22%)     max: 1977 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
min: 4838     avg: 6502     median: 5781 (13%)     max: 9537 points
min: 11433     avg: 13992     median: 14485 (34%)     max: 16058 points
AnTuTu v4 - Total Score
min: 17286     avg: 17314     median: 17307 (40%)     max: 17349
min: 25761     avg: 27891     median: 27979 (65%)     max: 30358
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
min: 18063     avg: 19220     median: 19113 (19%)     max: 20838 Points
min: 22774     avg: 28587     median: 29100 (29%)     max: 33176 Points
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
23643 Points (8%)
AndEBench - Java
min: 299     avg: 344     median: 358 (11%)     max: 371 Iter./s
min: 329     avg: 386     median: 384.5 (12%)     max: 447 Iter./s
AndEBench - Native
min: 6523     avg: 6867     median: 6948.5 (23%)     max: 7045 Iter./s
min: 11657     avg: 16616     median: 17876 (59%)     max: 19055 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - CPU Tests
min: 9174     avg: 9761     median: 9807 (1%)     max: 10230 Points
min: 13907     avg: 22989     median: 25313.5 (3%)     max: 26698 Points
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
min: 1910     avg: 2425     median: 2468.5 (13%)     max: 2852 Points
min: 2991     avg: 3194     median: 3193.5 (16%)     max: 3396 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6582 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6592 → 148%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)