Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

MediaTek MT6575 vs MediaTek MT8317T

MediaTek MT6575

► remove from comparison MT6575

The MediaTek MT6575 is an ARM-based SoC for entry-level Android smartphones and tablets. It contains a single Cortex-A9 CPU at 1 GHz, a PowerVR SGX 531 GPU and a 3G/HSPA radio.

MediaTek MT8317T

► remove from comparison MT8317T

The Mediatek MTK 8317T is an inexpensive SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. The SoC is both based on and recognized as the Mediatek MT6577, but with a slightly higher clock rate of 1.2 GHz. The CPU cores are based on the Cortex-A9 architecture and the chip includes a PowerVR SGX531 GPU.

show full text
ModelMediaTek MT6575MediaTek MT8317T
Series Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8377 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8317T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6577 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
» MediaTek MT65751 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT8377 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
» MediaTek MT8317T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT6577 compare1 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
MediaTek MT65751 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
Clock1000 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 2
Technology40 nm
Features3G, HSPA, PowerVR SGX 531 GPU
iGPUPowerVR SGX531PowerVR SGX531
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturer Mediatek MT6575

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
1773 Points (1%)
3555 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
315 Points (3%)
min: 274     avg: 301     median: 301 (2%)     max: 328 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
845 Points (8%)
min: 620     avg: 723     median: 723 (7%)     max: 826 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
696 Points (1%)
min: 1218     avg: 1257     median: 1256.5 (2%)     max: 1295 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
396 Points (1%)
min: 726     avg: 729     median: 728.5 (1%)     max: 731 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
582 Points (2%)
min: 833     avg: 869     median: 869 (2%)     max: 905 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
34.8 MFLOPS (1%)
min: 37.33     avg: 52.8     median: 52.8 (2%)     max: 68.2 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
31.6 MFLOPS (3%)
min: 37.8     avg: 38.5     median: 38.5 (4%)     max: 39.28 MFLOPS
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
1727 ms (16%)
min: 1000     avg: 1198     median: 1197.5 (11%)     max: 1395 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8317T +
1347 ms (15%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8317T +
min: 3060     avg: 3152     median: 3152 (7%)     max: 3244 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
1220 Points (8%)
min: 3201     avg: 3212     median: 3212 (21%)     max: 3223 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8317T +
199 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8317T +
4404 Iter./s (14%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8317T +
4319 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT6575 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8317T → 154% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 18. 14:58:19

#0 checking url part for id 4195 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3715 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#12 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 4195 +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.008s

#17 got single benchmarks 4195 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 3715 +0s ... 0.015s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#20 got single benchmarks 3715 +0.006s ... 0.021s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.022s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.027s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#54 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.029s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#56 return log +0.004s ... 0.033s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)