Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200

The NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 for laptops has been positioned as a competitor to ATI Mobility Radeon 9200. It offers multi-screen-support (additional external screen) and DirectX 9 functions.

Currently, it is a competitor of the faster integrated graphic chips like the ATI Radeon Xpress 1150.

The GeForce FX Go 5300 was an OEM version for Medion with lower clock (275/250 MHz) and 64 MB RAM.

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700

The NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 is the strongest video card of the GeForce FX Go series. The direct competitor was the ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 / 9700, which was clearly faster in demanding games. It offers Multi-Display-Support (external screen additionally).

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650

The NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 for notebooks was established as a competitor to ATI Mobility Radeon 9600. However, the ATI card was clearly faster. It offers multi-screen-support (external screen additionally) and DirectX 9 functions. The successor was the enhanced GeForce FX Go 5700.

The 5600 has either 4x1 or 2x2 design (pixel- x vertex-shader), which depends on simple or double textured pixels.

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650
GeForce FX Go Series
GeForce FX Go 5700 4/0 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 275 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 4/1 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5200 4/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5700 4/0 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 275 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 4/1 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5200 4/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5700 4/0 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 275 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 4/1 cores @ 0.35 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5200 4/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
CodenameNV31MNV36MNV31M
Pipelines4 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed300 MHz450 MHz350 MHz
Memory Speed300 MHz275 MHz300 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeDDRDDRDDR
Max. Amount of Memory32 MB32 MB32 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9, Shader 2.0+DirectX 9, Shader 2.0+DirectX 9, Shader 2.0+
technology150 nm130 nm130 nm
Features150nm, 1.2 - 1.3 Volt core tension, 4x FSAA, 8x AF, PowerMizer 3.0, maximally QXGA 2048x1536, no IntelliSamplePowerMizer 4.0, VPE 3.0, 128-Bit Color, nView Multi-Display, UltraShadow, Intellisample HCT, CineFX Engine 2.0PowerMizer, VPE, nView Multi-Display, Intellisample, CineFX Engine
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement01.03.2003 01.01.2004 01.03.2003
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.com
Information130nm, AGP150 / 130nm, AGP 8x, 6 Pixelshader-Operationen pro Clock-Signal

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
6800 Points (7%)
11000 Points (11%)
9100 Points (9%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
1100 Points (1%)
2700 Points (1%)
1900 Points (1%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
500 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 → 204% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 → 153% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 10:36:37

#0 checking url part for id 65 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 46 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 47 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.124s ... 0.125s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.125s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.125s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 65 +0.037s ... 0.162s

#9 got single benchmarks 65 +0.009s ... 0.171s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 46 +0.002s ... 0.172s

#11 got single benchmarks 46 +0.006s ... 0.178s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 47 +0.002s ... 0.18s

#13 got single benchmarks 47 +0.004s ... 0.184s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.184s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.198s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.198s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.2s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.201s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)