Notebookcheck Logo

Vivante GC4000 vs Vivante GC7000UL

Vivante GC4000

► remove from comparison

The Vivante GC4000 is an integrated graphics card for ARM and MIPS based SoCs. It offers 8 VEC-4 or 32 VEC-1 shader cores. Built using the 40nm LP process at TSMC, Vivante specifies the card  200 M Tir/s geometry rate, 2.5 G Pixels/s texture rate and 45 GFLOPS processing power. It should be 5-8x faster than the GC800 but of course also larger than the GC 800 and GC2000.

Vivante GC7000UL

► remove from comparison

The Vivante GC7000UL is an integrated low end GPU for ARM based smartphones and tablets. It is mostly used for Android based devices and the performance should be similar to the Adreno 305. It is used in the Marvell Technology Group Armada PXA1908 SoC (e.g. in the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3).

The 3D performance is only suited for low resolution screens. In our review of the Xcover 3 for example Asphalt 8 ran fluently in high detail settings.

show full text
Vivante GC4000Vivante GC7000UL
GC Series
GC7000UL 8
GC4000 8
GC7000UL 8
GC4000 8
Pipelines8 - unified8 - unified
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 2.0OpenGL ES 3.1
Date of Announcement01.05.2013 01.01.2014
CPU in GC7000ULGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Marvell Armada PXA19084 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
2591 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1396     avg: 1701     median: 1700.5 (0%)     max: 2005 Points
1412 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 2810     avg: 3353     median: 2877 (0%)     max: 4144 Points
3274 Points (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
0.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC4000
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.9     avg: 8.3     median: 4.1 (0%)     max: 22 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC7000UL
5.4 fps (0%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
100%
1 GC4000 +
min: 1734     avg: 1752     median: 1758 (61%)     max: 1764 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
100%
1 GC4000 +
min: 4411     avg: 5197     median: 4643.5 (41%)     max: 7089 Points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
100%
1 GC4000 +
min: 2391     avg: 4806     median: 5486.5 (57%)     max: 5861 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
100%
1 GC4000 +
min: 10.67     avg: 23.4     median: 27.8 (46%)     max: 30.26 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
100%
1 GC4000 +
min: 1.092     avg: 2     median: 2.2 (10%)     max: 2.633 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
983 Points (2%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
4078 Points (9%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
100%
1 GC4000 +
min: 53.4     avg: 59.5     median: 59.9 (89%)     max: 65.1 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1139     avg: 1638     median: 1710 (2%)     max: 1910 Points
3000 Points (3%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 438     avg: 634     median: 657 (1%)     max: 798 Points
739 Points (1%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 1607     avg: 2605     median: 2852 (62%)     max: 3148 Points
3781 Points (82%)

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC4000 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC7000UL → 125% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 02:18:59

#0 checking url part for id 3544 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6271 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.074s ... 0.075s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.075s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.075s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3544 +0.027s ... 0.102s

#8 got single benchmarks 3544 +0.015s ... 0.117s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6271 +0.002s ... 0.119s

#10 got single benchmarks 6271 +0.007s ... 0.126s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.061s ... 0.187s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.187s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.192s

#15 return log +0.079s ... 0.271s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)