AMD E1-1200 vs AMD E-300

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the old E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

Inside the E1-1200 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-300 lies a bit beyond a Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. In the E1-1200 the 7310 is clocked at 500 MHz and therefore not much different to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-300

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-300 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-300 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-300 lies a bit beyond a Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. Furthermore, the E-300 also support HTMI 1.4a.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E1-1200AMD E-300
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1
1400 MHz1300 MHz
128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
18 18
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Architecturex86x86
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
min: 0.46     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (9%)     max: 0.28 Points
min: 0.24     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.26 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (8%)     max: 918
853 (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (3%)     max: 1791
1176 (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (2%)     max: 1926 Points
min: 1714     avg: 1762     median: 1761.5 (2%)     max: 1809 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (8%)     max: 1008 Points
min: 899     avg: 920     median: 920 (7%)     max: 941 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2678.85 s
2511 s (30%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.187 s
79 s (16%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 398     avg: 418     median: 417.5 (3%)     max: 437
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (5%)     max: 905 Points
min: 836     avg: 839     median: 838.5 (5%)     max: 841 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 48.435     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
min: 59     avg: 59.5     median: 59.5 (13%)     max: 60 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 110.502     avg: 121     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
min: 132     avg: 134     median: 133.5 (6%)     max: 135 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2717.76     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
min: 2920     avg: 2941     median: 2940.5 (13%)     max: 2961 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8000 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
3.4 Points (44%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (2%)     max: 1738 Points
min: 1544     avg: 1580     median: 1579.5 (2%)     max: 1615 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (2%)     max: 605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
748 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks AMD E-300 → 94% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)