Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A6-6400K vs AMD A10-6800K

AMD A6-6400K

► remove from comparison AMD AMD A6-6400K

The AMD A6-6400K is a desktop APU from the Richland series. The chip is produced ​​in a 32nm process and integrates 1 module with 2 CPU cores clocked at 3.9 to 4.1 GHz. Furthermore, the 6400K has a Radeon HD 8470D graphics unit and a DDR3-1600 memory controller. 

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture called Piledriver. Although marketed as a Dual-core processor, the A6-6400K includes only one module with two integer-cores and one floating-point unit in total. As a result, the CPU is not a true dual-core processor.

The CPU performance of the A6-6400K is about on a level of a 2.2 to 2.4 GHz Pentium processor of the Sandy Bridge generation.

The integrated DirectX 11-compatible Radeon HD 8470D offers only 192 of the 384 shader cores of the Richland chip and a core clock of 800 MHz with no Turbo support. 

The power consumption of the entire desktop APU is rated at 65 Watts.

AMD A10-6800K

► remove from comparison AMD AMD A10-6800K

The AMD A10-6800K is a desktop APU from the Richland series. The chip is produced ​​in a 32nm process and integrates 2 modules with 4 CPU cores clocked at 4.1 to 4.4 GHz. Furthermore, the 6800K has a Radeon HD 8670D graphics unit and a DDR3-2133 memory controller. Due to the unlocked multiplier, the CPU can overclock very easily. Compared to the previous Trinity generation A10-5800K, the 6800K offers higher clocked CPU and GPU cores and supports higher clocked main memory. Otherwise, only small optimizations regarding power and turbo were made.

The CPU cores are based on a reworked Bulldozer architecture called Piledriver. Although marketed as a quad-core processor, the A10-6800K includes only two modules with four integer-cores and two floating-point units in total. As a result, the CPU is not a true quad-core processor.

Depending on the benchmark, the CPU performance of the A10-6800K is slightly faster than the old A10-5800K due to the higher clock rates (same architecture). Therefore, it is similar to Ivy Bridge Core i3 CPUs. The chip shows good performance on applications with high parallelization, whereas performance per thread is less impressive. For everyday tasks like Office, multimedia applications or Internet surfing, the 5800K is suitable without restrictions; even demanding 3D games are possible if paired with a dedicated graphics card.

The integrated DirectX 11-compatible Radeon HD 8670D offers all 384 shader cores of the Richland chip and a core clock of 844 MHz with no Turbo support. 

The power consumption of the entire desktop APU is rated at 100 Watts.

ModelAMD A6-6400KAMD A10-6800K
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)AMD A-Series (Desktop)
CodenameRichlandRichland
Series: A-Series (Desktop) Richland
AMD A10-6800K4.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-6600K compare3.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-6400K « 3.9 - 4.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD A10-6800K « 4.1 - 4.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-6600K compare3.9 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-6400K3.9 - 4.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock3900 - 4100 MHz4100 - 4400 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP65 Watt100 Watt
Transistors1303 Million1303 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm
Die Size246 mm2246 mm2
SocketFM2
FeaturesMMX, SSE1-4a, AES, ABM, AVX, BMI1, AMD64, VT, EVP, Turbo Core 3.0
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 8470D (800 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 8670D (844 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.74 °C
$142 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
149 Points (1%)
min: 325     avg: 326     median: 326 (2%)     max: 327 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
88 Points (27%)
100 Points (30%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.7 Points (2%)
3.6 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (21%)
1.1 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3007     avg: 3068     median: 3067.5 (19%)     max: 3128 Points
3428 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5063     avg: 5079     median: 5079 (4%)     max: 5095 Points
10077 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6868 Points (5%)
13938 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
4123 Points (5%)
4637 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
510 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
16.1 s (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11.2 fps (4%)
23.3 fps (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
56.9 fps (13%)
111 fps (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1 GB/s (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2654 Points (6%)
4885 Points (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21.7 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
49.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1288 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5122 Points (4%)
11097 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1998 Points (5%)
4066 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11495 Points (9%)
41083 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11502 Points (9%)
41079 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
899 Points (2%)
3284 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2268 Points (4%)
4744 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6774 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2340 Points (46%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-6400K → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-6800K → 212% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 23:39:14

#0 checking url part for id 4411 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4410 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4411 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#7 got single benchmarks 4411 +0.009s ... 0.038s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4410 +0.003s ... 0.041s

#9 got single benchmarks 4410 +0.009s ... 0.05s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.152s ... 0.201s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.225s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)