Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon RX 490M vs AMD Radeon Pro 450

AMD Radeon RX 490M

► remove from comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 490M (formerly known as R9 M490) is a mobile high end graphics cards. It should be based on the new Polaris architecture and manufactured in 14nm FinFET. Up to now it only surfaced in a driver (according to Videocardz.com) and should be announced in mid 2016. The efficiency of Polaris should be greatly improved and therefore the M490 should at least be able to perform like a GeForce GTX 980M.

AMD Radeon Pro 450

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro 450

The AMD Radeon Pro 450 is mobile graphics card for laptops that can be found in the entry-level model of the Apple MacBook Pro Retina 15 Late 2016. It is based on the small Polaris 11 chip which is manufactured in 14 nm FinFET at Globalfoundries. Compared to the similar Radeon RX 460 (see for benchmarks), the Pro 450 features only 640 shaders (compared to the 896) and achieves a peak performance of 1 TFLOPS (versus the 2.2 of the RX 460). The Pro 455 is 30% faster with 1.3 TFLOPS and the Pro 460 86% faster (peak performance).

The graphics performance in our first tests (e.g. 3DMark 11) is slightly above a GeForce GTX 950M. A major drawback is the small VRAM size of only 2 GB GDDR5. Furthermore, Apple and AMD don't provide driver updates for Windows using Bootcamp. The only option is to use modified drivers from BootcampDrivers.com.

The features of the Radeon Pro 450 are identical to the faster RX 460 and all other Polaris chips. See more details on the Polaris architecture here. According to AMD the Pro 450 supports DisplayPort 1.2 (although the Polaris chips should support 1.4) and HDMI 2.0 via USB-C adapter.

The power envelope of the faster Radeon Pro 460 is rated at 35 Watt according to the AMD blog post. Due to the slower specs, the Radeon Pro 450 should use slightly less.

AMD Radeon RX 490MAMD Radeon Pro 450
Radeon RX 400M Series
Radeon RX 480 (Laptop) compare 2304 256 Bit
Radeon RX 490M
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) compare 896 @ 1.18 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro 460 compare 1024 @ 0.9 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon Pro 455 compare 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon Pro 450 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Radeon RX 480 (Laptop) compare 2304 256 Bit
Radeon RX 490M
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) compare 896 @ 1.18 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon Pro 460 compare 1024 @ 0.9 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon Pro 455 compare 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon Pro 450 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
CodenamePolarisPolaris 11
ArchitecturePolarisPolaris
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12DirectX 12, OpenGL Vulkan
technology14 nm14 nm
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement01.08.2016 27.10.2016
Pipelines640 - unified
Core Speed800 MHz
Memory Speed5080 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Max. Amount of Memory2048 MB
Power Consumption75 Watt
Transistors3 Billion
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Link to Manufacturer Pagecreators.radeon.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon Pro 450
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon Pro 450
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon Pro 450
3DMark 06
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Pro 450
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Pro 450
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
38.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
12  fps
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
95  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
41  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
33  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
63.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
47.5  fps
4K 3840x2160
Radeon Pro 450:
19.3  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
68.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
26.5  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
16.4  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
48.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
21.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
18.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
8  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
82.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
29.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
27.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
19.4  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
47.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
17.6  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
29.5  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
58.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
36  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
63.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
24.7  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
101  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
24.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
21.7  fps
low 1024x768
Radeon Pro 450:
61  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
25.8  fps
Mafia 3

Mafia 3

2016
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
28.3  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
51.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
17.4 18.3 ~ 18 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
7.5  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
153  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
39.5  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
53.4  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
20.4  fps
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
77  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
21.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
15.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
29  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
26  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
17  fps
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
63.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
24.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
15.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
5.6  fps
low 1024x768
Radeon Pro 450:
66.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
20.7 20.9 ~ 21 fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
34.1  fps
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
Radeon Pro 450:
70  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
24.1  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
Radeon Pro 450:
87  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
44.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
67.2  fps
low 1024x768
Radeon Pro 450:
40.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Radeon Pro 450:
20.3  fps
AMD Radeon Pro 450lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ark Survival Evolved38.912
F1 2017954133
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)63.3
Rocket League47.519.3
Mass Effect Andromeda68.226.516.4
Ghost Recon Wildlands48.221.318.58
For Honor82.329.327.919.4
Watch Dogs 247.417.6
Dishonored 229.5
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare58.736
Farming Simulator 1763.424.7
Battlefield 110124.221.7
Civilization VI6125.8
Mafia 328.3
Deus Ex Mankind Divided51.2187.5
Overwatch1535739.5
Doom53.420.4
The Division7721.615.8
Far Cry Primal292617
XCOM 263.724.215.55.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider66.621
Rainbow Six Siege39.634.1
Fallout 47024.1
Anno 22058718.3
World of Warships44.6
Dota 2 Reborn67.2
The Witcher 340.920.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
7
11
1
6
1

15
5
1
8
3
1



1


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
Errors [Close]

#0 Stopped to cacheFillTable as currently in progress (1 sys_registry entries found) +0s ... 0.006s

#1 sys_registry tx_nbc2fe_gpusingle_1 entry uid:586099 from 2024.06.03 10:15 +0s ... 0.006s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1074> for benchmark 201, setting:1066 +0s ... 0.117s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 952> for benchmark 201, setting:1067 +0s ... 0.119s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 200518> for benchmark 201, setting:714 +0s ... 0.12s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 14305> for benchmark 201, setting:603 +0s ... 0.121s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 21533> for benchmark 201, setting:604 +0s ... 0.122s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3027> for benchmark 201, setting:606 +0s ... 0.123s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3252> for benchmark 201, setting:607 +0s ... 0.124s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4914> for benchmark 73, setting:294 +0s ... 0.125s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 4502> for benchmark 73, setting:295 +0s ... 0.126s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 14245> for benchmark 37, setting:153 +0s ... 0.127s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 12634> for benchmark 37, setting:154 +0s ... 0.128s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 24189> for benchmark 4, setting:16 +0s ... 0.13s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 69.8> for benchmark 244, setting:707 +0s ... 0.131s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 99.5> for benchmark 244, setting:708 +0s ... 0.132s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 394> for benchmark 146, setting:484 +0s ... 0.133s

#17 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 774> for benchmark 146, setting:483 +0s ... 0.134s

#18 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2589> for benchmark 147, setting:485 +0s ... 0.135s

#19 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 44.5> for benchmark 416, setting:1155 +0s ... 0.136s

log 03. 11:10:21

#0 checking url part for id 7304 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7590 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 will recreate cache as older than 5 days: 1717405821s = 19877.3821875d, id:gpuID:7304 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 table tx_nbc2_benchcache_gpu already found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 About to fill cache table +0s ... 0.005s

#6 composed specs +0.078s ... 0.083s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.083s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.083s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7304 +0.022s ... 0.106s

#10 got single benchmarks 7304 +0s ... 0.106s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 7590 +0.001s ... 0.107s

#12 got single benchmarks 7590 +0.009s ... 0.116s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.117s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.119s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.12s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.121s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.122s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.123s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.124s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.125s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.126s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.127s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.128s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.13s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.131s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.132s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.133s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.134s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.135s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.136s

#32 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.136s

#33 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.136s

#34 Got 64 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.144s

#35 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.144s

#36 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.017s ... 0.161s

#37 benchmarks composed for output. +0.058s ... 0.219s

#38 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.219s

#39 return log +0.069s ... 0.287s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)