Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

The Quadro FX 770M is a professional midrange graphics adapter for laptops / mobile workstations. The GPU is optimized for professional 2D and 3D applications like CAD, DCC, and visualization software. The FX770M solutions contains certified graphics drivers for the most popular applications.

The GPU chip of the Quadro FX770M is based on the GeForce 9600M GT consumer card for notebooks. Therefore, the Quadro has the same features (like the PureVideo HD video-processor) as the 9600M GT.

The performance of the card should be compareable to the 9600M GT. Still some games may run slower, as the drivers are optimized for applications and OpenGL. Especially the OpenGL performance is way better than with an 9600M GT. The Cinebench R10 OpenGL test shows up to twize the performance with a FX 770M compared to a GeForce 9600M GT.

As all cards of the GeForce 9000M series, the 770M support CUDA.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M is a upper mid-range professional graphics card for mobile workstations with about 15" displays. It is based on the same chip as the GeForce GT 335M but can be also equipped with fast GDDR5 graphics memory. The FX1800M is shipped with professional drivers and a special BIOS that improves the performance and stability in applications like CAD and DCC.

The certified drivers guarantee flawless and fast working with professional applications like Premiere, Photoshop, After Effect, AutoCAD, 3ds Max, trueSpace, Blender, Catia, IronCAD, Cinema 4D, Lightwave 3D, Softimage, Mathematica ... A list of all certified applications can be found on the Nvidia.com homepage. Compared to GeForce products, the Quadro FX cards offer a significantly better performance, especially for OpenGL based apps.

The gaming performance should be similar to the GeForce GT 335M, altough gamers should choose a GeForce graphics card because of the optimized driver support (that leads to a better performance and less problems in games). Still all modern and demanding games of 2009 should at least run in medium detail settings (see the GeForce GT 335M page for more gaming results).

The chip is manufactured in 40nm and offers 72 1-dimensional unified shaders. These can be compared to about 300-400 5-dimensional shaders in graphics cards by AMD. These processing cores can also be accessed with CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectCompute to use the calculation power for other tasks than rendering images (for example transcoding videos). 

The QuadroFX 1800M also supports PureVideo HD with the new VideoProcessor (VP4) to decode HD videos on the graphics card. This helps reducing CPU load and increasing battery runtimes.

The Quadro FX 1800M also supports the automatic switching between the integrated and dedicated graphics card using Optimus. First mobile workstations do not offer Optimus, as the development cycles of these laptops are very long.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9P-GLM
ArchitectureG9xGT2xx
Pipelines32 - unified72 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz560 MHz
Shader Speed1250 MHz1125 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz1100 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2 / GDDR3DDR3, GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Power Consumption35 Watt45 Watt
Transistors314 Million
technology65 nm40 nm
Features OpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, 12-Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit graphics pipeline precisionPowerMizer 9.0, EnergyStar (3.8W), 16x FSAA Support, CUDA, NVIEW, OpenGL 3.2
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement14.08.2008 01.02.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
3DMark 06
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
94.2  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
39  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
19.5  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
84.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
35.4  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
18.1  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
165.2  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
171.3  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
158.7  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
126.1  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark94.23919.5
Crysis - CPU Benchmark84.735.418.1
Doom 3165.2171.3158.7126.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2
1

2

1
2


1



1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
Errors [Close]

#0 Stopped to cacheFillTable as currently in progress (1 sys_registry entries found) +0s ... 0.004s

#1 sys_registry tx_nbc2fe_gpusingle_1 entry uid:586099 from 2024.06.03 10:15 +0s ... 0.004s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3459> for benchmark 37, setting:153 +0s ... 0.142s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2827> for benchmark 37, setting:154 +0s ... 0.143s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 34871> for benchmark 1, setting:13 +0s ... 0.144s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 17192> for benchmark 2, setting:14 +0s ... 0.145s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 11161> for benchmark 3, setting:15 +0s ... 0.146s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 15249> for benchmark 3, setting:15 +0s ... 0.147s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5363> for benchmark 4, setting:16 +0s ... 0.148s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7729> for benchmark 4, setting:16 +0s ... 0.149s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 33.06> for benchmark 38, setting:166 +0s ... 0.15s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 40.1> for benchmark 38, setting:167 +0s ... 0.151s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 31.74> for benchmark 38, setting:168 +0s ... 0.152s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 85.1> for benchmark 38, setting:169 +0s ... 0.153s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 36.12> for benchmark 38, setting:170 +0s ... 0.154s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 55> for benchmark 38, setting:171 +0s ... 0.155s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 19.01> for benchmark 38, setting:172 +0s ... 0.156s

#17 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 17.52> for benchmark 38, setting:173 +0s ... 0.157s

#18 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 12.35> for benchmark 70, setting:285 +0s ... 0.158s

#19 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 13.03> for benchmark 70, setting:284 +0s ... 0.159s

#20 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 28.05> for benchmark 70, setting:283 +0s ... 0.16s

#21 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7.51> for benchmark 70, setting:282 +0s ... 0.162s

#22 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 16.57> for benchmark 70, setting:281 +0s ... 0.162s

#23 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 39.03> for benchmark 70, setting:280 +0s ... 0.163s

#24 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 12.3> for benchmark 70, setting:279 +0s ... 0.164s

#25 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 17.51> for benchmark 70, setting:278 +0s ... 0.165s

#26 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6.6> for benchmark 59, setting:227 +0s ... 0.166s

#27 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5> for benchmark 59, setting:226 +0s ... 0.167s

#28 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6180> for benchmark 22, setting:38 +0s ... 0.168s

#29 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 19.98> for benchmark 62, setting:249 +0s ... 0.169s

log 03. 10:35:30

#0 checking url part for id 884 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1649 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 will recreate cache as older than 5 days: 1717403730s = 19877.357986111d, id:gpuID:884 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 table tx_nbc2_benchcache_gpu already found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 About to fill cache table +0s ... 0.004s

#6 composed specs +0.089s ... 0.093s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.093s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.093s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 884 +0.025s ... 0.118s

#10 got single benchmarks 884 +0.01s ... 0.128s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1649 +0.001s ... 0.129s

#12 got single benchmarks 1649 +0.011s ... 0.14s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.14s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.142s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.143s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.144s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.145s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.146s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.147s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.148s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.149s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.15s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.151s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.152s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.153s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.154s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.155s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.156s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.157s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.158s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.159s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.16s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.161s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.162s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.163s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.164s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.165s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.166s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.167s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.168s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.169s

#42 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.169s

#43 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.169s

#44 Got 10 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.172s

#45 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.172s

#46 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.174s

#47 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.181s

#48 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.181s

#49 return log +0.043s ... 0.224s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)