Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-9980HK vs Intel Core i7-8750H vs Intel Xeon E-2176M

Intel Core i9-9980HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-9980HK

The Intel Core i9-9980HK is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture (2019 refresh, CFL-HR). The processor clocks at between 2.4 - 5 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5 GHz can only be reached using the "Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows one core to boost to 5 GHz (+100 MHz) as long as the CPU temperature is below 50°C. Multiple cores can be boosted +100 MHz? below 50°C (not verified). Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-8950HK, the 9980H is based on the same architecture but offers 2 more cores and higher clock speeds (boost).

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The i9-9980HK is the fastest model of the Coffee-Lake-H (refresh) series at the time of announcement and offers an unlocked multiplier for overclocking of the CPU.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now max. eight cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 33% compared to a similar clocked 6-core processor. According to first benchmarks, the mobile variant can reach the performance of the Core i9-9900K if the cooling is sufficient.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz. The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

Intel Core i7-8750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8750H

The Intel Core i7-8750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.2 and 4.1 GHz (4 GHz with 4 cores, 3.9 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7820HQ (2.9 - 3.9 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8850H is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Xeon E-2176M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2176M

The Intel Xeon E-2176M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.7 - 4.4 GHz (4.1 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The Xeon E-2176M is the second fastest model after the Xeon E-2178M / Core i9-8950HK in early 2018. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-8850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory, is slightly higher clocked and offers more L3 cache.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is unchanged to the older Intel HD Graphics 630 an maybe only slightly higher clocked. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

ModelIntel Core i9-9980HKIntel Core i7-8750HIntel Xeon E-2176M
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK « 2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H « 2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M « 2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 5000 MHz2200 - 4100 MHz2700 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB9 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 126 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-9980HK
35.4 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8750H
31.2 pt (43%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 431     avg: 471.3     median: 478.5 (53%)     max: 505 Points
min: 403     avg: 411.8     median: 412.5 (46%)     max: 418 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2974     avg: 3530     median: 3475 (8%)     max: 4150 Points
min: 2142     avg: 2377     median: 2336.5 (6%)     max: 2707 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1327     avg: 1656     median: 1624 (10%)     max: 1930 Points
min: 863     avg: 1113     median: 1116 (7%)     max: 1251 Points
min: 987     avg: 1067     median: 1095 (7%)     max: 1118 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 181     avg: 198.8     median: 201 (61%)     max: 215 Points
min: 163     avg: 172     median: 173 (52%)     max: 177 Points
min: 169     avg: 181.7     median: 187 (56%)     max: 189 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 14.81     avg: 16.7     median: 17.2 (22%)     max: 18.04 Points
min: 9.54     avg: 12.2     median: 12.3 (16%)     max: 13.54 Points
min: 9.32     avg: 11.3     median: 12.3 (16%)     max: 12.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.25     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (57%)     max: 2.4 Points
min: 1.89     avg: 2     median: 2 (49%)     max: 2 Points
min: 1.99     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (51%)     max: 2.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7709     avg: 8346     median: 7969.5 (48%)     max: 9734 Points
min: 6236     avg: 6479     median: 6471 (39%)     max: 6645 Points
min: 6928     avg: 7681     median: 6973 (42%)     max: 9142 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 39440     avg: 44697     median: 44455 (32%)     max: 50439 Points
min: 29664     avg: 33163     median: 33595 (24%)     max: 35307 Points
min: 31923     avg: 35912     median: 32132 (23%)     max: 43681 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
55742 Points (39%)
min: 33944     avg: 42290     median: 43494 (30%)     max: 46384 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10359 Points (13%)
min: 8472     avg: 8542     median: 8498 (10%)     max: 8665 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 110.4     avg: 115.3     median: 115.3 (1%)     max: 120.2 s
min: 125.5     avg: 157.5     median: 156.8 (2%)     max: 180.5 s
min: 147     avg: 163.3     median: 163.3 (2%)     max: 179.6 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.788     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (1%)     max: 4.941 s
min: 4.35     avg: 7.1     median: 5.5 (1%)     max: 16.26 s
min: 4.909     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (1%)     max: 5.77 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7266     avg: 7351     median: 7351 (12%)     max: 7436 Points
5310 Points (8%)
min: 3947     avg: 4625     median: 4624.5 (7%)     max: 5302 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 39566     avg: 41756     median: 41688 (24%)     max: 44081 MIPS
min: 28826     avg: 30674     median: 31144 (18%)     max: 33257 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5283     avg: 5426     median: 5389.5 (64%)     max: 5642 MIPS
min: 4599     avg: 4621     median: 4629 (55%)     max: 4630 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 92.8     avg: 93.8     median: 93.8 (33%)     max: 94.8 fps
min: 64.2     avg: 67.2     median: 67.2 (23%)     max: 70.2 fps
min: 58.2     avg: 63.1     median: 63.1 (22%)     max: 67.9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 237.5     avg: 238.1     median: 238.1 (55%)     max: 238.7 fps
min: 193.5     avg: 200.3     median: 200.3 (46%)     max: 207.1 fps
min: 195.8     avg: 203.6     median: 203.6 (47%)     max: 211.3 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.8     avg: 11.5     median: 11.4 (20%)     max: 12.35 fps
min: 7.56     avg: 8.2     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 9.55 fps
8.7 fps (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
0.7 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.601     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (0%)     max: 0.756 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
1.2 GB/s (21%)
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (19%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 10.1     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (27%)     max: 10.3 GB/s
7 GB/s (18%)
min: 6.1     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (18%)     max: 7.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 317.4     avg: 397.6     median: 348.4 (2%)     max: 527 Seconds
min: 395.5     avg: 456.2     median: 469.3 (3%)     max: 485.9 Seconds
min: 465.8     avg: 510     median: 509.9 (4%)     max: 554 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11256     avg: 12585     median: 13208 (28%)     max: 13290 Points
min: 7531     avg: 10078     median: 10294.5 (22%)     max: 10832 Points
min: 7203     avg: 9007     median: 9757 (21%)     max: 10061 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.639     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 7.856 s
min: 8.98     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 9.45 s
min: 8.508     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 8.69 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.84     avg: 17.1     median: 17.1 (1%)     max: 17.26 s
min: 20.26     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (1%)     max: 21.39 s
min: 18.78     avg: 19     median: 19 (1%)     max: 19.26 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 424.4     avg: 432.3     median: 432.3 (2%)     max: 440.1 s
min: 509     avg: 524     median: 524 (2%)     max: 537 s
min: 475.2     avg: 477     median: 477 (2%)     max: 478.8 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
49107 Points (43%)
min: 27882     avg: 36281     median: 37117 (32%)     max: 41516 Points
min: 38520     avg: 39431     median: 39431 (35%)     max: 40342 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9056     avg: 15688     median: 16079.5 (43%)     max: 18260 Points
min: 7869     avg: 11044     median: 11474.5 (31%)     max: 13112 Points
min: 10234     avg: 11628     median: 11727 (32%)     max: 12923 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 64033     avg: 64733     median: 65047 (53%)     max: 65119 Points
min: 43026     avg: 55905     median: 56773 (46%)     max: 58897 Points
min: 30521     avg: 44313     median: 44313 (36%)     max: 58105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 64156     avg: 64682     median: 64841 (53%)     max: 65049 Points
min: 51146     avg: 56438     median: 56720 (46%)     max: 58704 Points
min: 30553     avg: 43412     median: 43412 (35%)     max: 56271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 60812     avg: 63911     median: 64615.5 (54%)     max: 65599 Points
min: 55371     avg: 57714     median: 57465.5 (48%)     max: 60233 Points
min: 59124     avg: 59647     median: 59646.5 (50%)     max: 60169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13173     avg: 15303     median: 15694.5 (40%)     max: 16935 Points
min: 4876     avg: 9924     median: 10149 (26%)     max: 11320 Points
min: 5617     avg: 8399     median: 9331 (24%)     max: 10250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 11758     avg: 19893     median: 20357 (36%)     max: 22463 Points
min: 8551     avg: 15199     median: 15533 (28%)     max: 17219 Points
min: 11097     avg: 13737     median: 14418 (26%)     max: 15696 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5540     avg: 8487     median: 8884.5 (37%)     max: 10162 Points
min: 2859     avg: 5724     median: 5858 (25%)     max: 7037 Points
min: 3916     avg: 4729     median: 4728.5 (20%)     max: 5541 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
7968 Points (94%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1314     avg: 1346     median: 1346 (57%)     max: 1378 Points
1050 Points (44%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6945     avg: 7405     median: 7568 (14%)     max: 7703 Points
4820 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1171     avg: 1273     median: 1282 (6%)     max: 1355 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7072     avg: 7421     median: 7403.5 (23%)     max: 7805 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5617     avg: 5853     median: 5969 (60%)     max: 5972 Points
min: 4669     avg: 4982     median: 5040 (50%)     max: 5146 Points
min: 4077     avg: 4660     median: 4660 (47%)     max: 5243 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 28625     avg: 29620     median: 29385 (33%)     max: 30849 Points
min: 17709     avg: 21069     median: 21648 (24%)     max: 23313 Points
min: 19388     avg: 20690     median: 20689.5 (23%)     max: 21991 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
6002 Points (82%)
min: 4548     avg: 4839     median: 4868.5 (66%)     max: 4997 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
30099 Points (73%)
min: 17048     avg: 19665     median: 19875 (48%)     max: 22006 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
31724 Points (56%)
min: 20725     avg: 21871     median: 21920 (39%)     max: 22665 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4871 Points (95%)
min: 3734     avg: 3995     median: 4008 (78%)     max: 4163 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 705     avg: 878     median: 941 (1%)     max: 999 ms
min: 695     avg: 1108     median: 1124 (1%)     max: 1272 ms
min: 1048     avg: 1054     median: 1054 (1%)     max: 1060 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 77.5     avg: 82.3     median: 83 (1%)     max: 85.8 ms
100%
1 E-2176M +
76.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 40364     avg: 42641     median: 42219.5 (38%)     max: 46473 Points
min: 27460     avg: 34108     median: 34163 (31%)     max: 44549 Points
min: 35521     avg: 36102     median: 36101.5 (32%)     max: 36682 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
233 Points (49%)
213 Points (44%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 97.2     avg: 103.3     median: 103.3 (18%)     max: 109.4 Watt
min: 0     avg: 67.1     median: 90.4 (16%)     max: 111 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 127.1     avg: 132.7     median: 132.7 (24%)     max: 138.2 Watt
min: 97     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (20%)     max: 122 Watt
111%
1 E-2176M +
88.9 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
13.2 Points per Watt (10%)
min: 8.19     avg: 21     median: 12.6 (9%)     max: 42.3 Points per Watt
12.6 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-9980HK → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8750H → 82% n=32

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2176M → 79% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 15:25:29

#0 checking url part for id 11341 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9576 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9904 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11341 +0.017s ... 0.051s

#8 got single benchmarks 11341 +0.046s ... 0.097s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9576 +0.017s ... 0.113s

#10 got single benchmarks 9576 +0.364s ... 0.478s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9904 +0.003s ... 0.481s

#12 got single benchmarks 9904 +0.013s ... 0.493s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.493s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.477s ... 0.97s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.971s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)