Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-12900H vs Intel Core i7-1260P

Intel Core i9-12900H

► remove from comparison Intel i9-12900H

The Intel Core i9-12900H is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in early 2022 and offers 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.5 to 5 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz on the efficient cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 24 MB L3 cache. Compared to the 12900HK, the 12900H does not offer the open multiplicator (for overclocking) but the full "Enterprise" set of vPro features (for remote management).

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, and LPDDR4x-4267. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU only supports PCIe 4.0 (x8 for a GPU and two x4 for SSDs).

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 96 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

Performance

The average 12900H in our database proves to be an outrageously fast CPU, ripping the Ryzen 9 6900HX to pieces as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Perhaps surprisingly, the i9's multi-thread performance is not much higher than that of the Core i7-12700H, suggesting the latter might be a better bang for the buck.

With its decent cooling solution and a long-term Power Limit of 110 W, the Asus StudioBook 16 H7600ZW is one of the fastest laptops built around the i9-12900H that we know of. It can be more than 80% faster than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Power consumption

The Core i9 has a "minimum assured" power consumption of 35 W, with 45 W being its Base power consumption. The CPU's maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sits at 115 W.

The i9-12900H is built with Intel's 4th generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower than average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1260P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1260P

The Intel Core i7-1260P is an upper mid-range 28 W Alder Lake CPU designed for use in ultra-light laptops. It was announced in early 2022 and it features 4 performance cores as opposed to the 6 cores of the top-of-the-line i7-1280P (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for a total of 16 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds range from 2.1 GHz to 4.7 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.5 GHz to 3.4 GHz for the efficient cluster. The i7's shortcomings as compared to Intel Core i7-1270P include the marginally lower clock speeds and limited vPro feature set ("Essentials" tier only, not allowing for remote device management).

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "littile" Alder Lake core is supposed to be just as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of an Core i7-1260P's CPU cores enjoy access to 18 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200; Intel recommends using no more than 64 GB, for reference. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Intel Core i7-1260P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

Multi-thread performance is most comparable to the Ryzen 7 5800U, Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U and also the Core i5-11260H. This makes the 1260P a great little CPU - one capable of punching above its weight.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 35 W, the Asus ExpertBook B5 Flip B5602FBN is among the fastest laptops featuring the 1260P that we know of. It can be about 2 times as fast in CPU-bound workloads as the slowest system built around the same chip in our database (as of August 2023).

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.4 GHz has seemingly seen no change from what was built into certain Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like a i7-1165G7. Which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. Up to 4 monitors can be used simultaneously with this graphics adapter. Its gaming performance is bound to be tied to how high the Power Limits and how good the cooling solution of a laptop are; expect something close to NVIDIA's MX350 or in other words, acceptable framerates in most games when playing at 1080p / Medium settings. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as the Iris Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory. Last but not the least, we discovered that the GPU utilization when playing YouTube UHD 2160p60 videos is higher than it was with Tiger Lake chips.

Power consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP or Power Limit 1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). Its "Minimum Assured" power consumption sits at 20 W. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this one here.

The i7-1260P is manufactured on Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. Despite that, many 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 parts are less power-hungry while being as fast (or even faster, depending on the workload) as the i7.

ModelIntel Core i9-12900HIntel Core i7-1260P
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PIntel Alder Lake-P
CodenameAlder Lake-HAlder Lake-P
Series: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-P
Intel Core i9-12900HK compare1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900H « 1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800H compare1.8 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650H compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600H compare2 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12500H compare1.8 - 4.5 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450H compare1.5 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1280P compare1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P « 1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P compare1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P compare1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock1800 - 5000 MHz1500 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB1.1 MB
L2 Cache11.5 MB10 MB
L3 Cache24 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 2012 / 16
TDP45 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1744BGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thread Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1400 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
44.1 pt (61%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1260P
39.2 pt (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 100.8     median: 100.5 (70%)     max: 106 Points
94 Points (65%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 371     avg: 558     median: 563 (10%)     max: 734 Points
435 Points (8%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 7359     avg: 15301     median: 15987 (15%)     max: 19648 Points
min: 6860     avg: 9551     median: 9711 (9%)     max: 12150 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1634     avg: 1822     median: 1863 (79%)     max: 1921 Points
min: 1433     avg: 1695     median: 1737.5 (74%)     max: 1812 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 624     avg: 705     median: 715 (79%)     max: 738 Points
min: 541     avg: 653     median: 670 (74%)     max: 698 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2681     avg: 5761     median: 6060 (15%)     max: 7471 Points
min: 2634     avg: 3694     median: 3761.5 (9%)     max: 4748 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1395     avg: 2482     median: 2586 (16%)     max: 3077 Points
min: 1081     avg: 1625     median: 1626 (10%)     max: 2034 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 235     avg: 262.2     median: 265 (80%)     max: 277 Points
min: 174.8     avg: 236.8     median: 243 (73%)     max: 260 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 12.08     avg: 23.7     median: 26 (34%)     max: 32.77 Points
min: 20.06     avg: 21.9     median: 22 (29%)     max: 23.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.83     avg: 3     median: 3 (74%)     max: 3.3 Points
min: 2.93     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (77%)     max: 3.15 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8083     avg: 8445     median: 8235 (50%)     max: 9498 Points
min: 8490     avg: 8737     median: 8793 (53%)     max: 8927 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 24313     avg: 44048     median: 47831 (35%)     max: 60567 Points
min: 33137     avg: 41867     median: 44516 (32%)     max: 47948 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 48178     avg: 64876     median: 66958.5 (46%)     max: 77409 Points
min: 53950     avg: 63721     median: 63721 (44%)     max: 73492 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12846     avg: 13091     median: 13130.5 (16%)     max: 13256 Points
min: 13568     avg: 14036     median: 14036 (17%)     max: 14504 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 187.176     avg: 211.3     median: 196.5 (2%)     max: 265.116 s
min: 235.874     avg: 262.5     median: 237.1 (3%)     max: 314.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.421     avg: 4.2     median: 4.1 (1%)     max: 5.062 s
min: 3.641     avg: 6     median: 4.5 (1%)     max: 9.8 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7620     avg: 8121     median: 7897 (13%)     max: 9328 Points
min: 6559     avg: 10179     median: 7200 (11%)     max: 16777 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 34684     avg: 61535     median: 64918 (37%)     max: 76677 MIPS
min: 29214     avg: 39648     median: 41260.5 (24%)     max: 47064 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5302     avg: 5835     median: 5881 (70%)     max: 6289 MIPS
min: 4668     avg: 5335     median: 5373 (64%)     max: 5791 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 67.5     avg: 103.9     median: 111.4 (39%)     max: 125.45 fps
min: 77.75     avg: 94.1     median: 94.1 (33%)     max: 110.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 225     avg: 255.1     median: 254.8 (59%)     max: 286 fps
min: 224     avg: 245     median: 245 (57%)     max: 266 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.05     avg: 17.3     median: 18.7 (33%)     max: 22.5 fps
min: 7.57     avg: 11     median: 11.5 (20%)     max: 13.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.864     avg: 1     median: 1 (0%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (0%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.5     avg: 1.8     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 2 GB/s
min: 1.8     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (33%)     max: 1.9 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 8.6     avg: 10     median: 9.7 (25%)     max: 12.8 GB/s
min: 10.4     avg: 11.2     median: 11.6 (30%)     max: 11.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 273     avg: 415.4     median: 375.5 (5%)     max: 850 Seconds
min: 494     avg: 638     median: 623 (8%)     max: 861 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 160     avg: 229.3     median: 201 (1%)     max: 451 Seconds
min: 264     avg: 344.2     median: 328 (2%)     max: 463 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4218     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.506 sec
min: 0.4559     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.569 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 10122     avg: 12562     median: 12799 (27%)     max: 14082 Points
min: 8954     avg: 12154     median: 12963.5 (28%)     max: 14103 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.3     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (2%)     max: 8.329 s
min: 7.718     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (2%)     max: 7.842 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.373     avg: 17.7     median: 18 (1%)     max: 18.439 s
min: 17.183     avg: 17.4     median: 17.4 (1%)     max: 17.587 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 385.4     avg: 416.2     median: 409.2 (2%)     max: 474.148 s
min: 407.751     avg: 420.7     median: 424.8 (2%)     max: 429.697 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 33640     avg: 50378     median: 52582 (46%)     max: 62706 Points
min: 44438     avg: 56424     median: 62250 (55%)     max: 66354 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10552     avg: 21605     median: 22620 (61%)     max: 26126 Points
min: 6250     avg: 14081     median: 14251 (39%)     max: 18968 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 77848     avg: 90608     median: 91828 (75%)     max: 103016 Points
min: 58070     avg: 71340     median: 72467.5 (59%)     max: 81448 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 71651     avg: 89609     median: 91745 (74%)     max: 103757 Points
min: 61536     avg: 73824     median: 76374 (62%)     max: 81012 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 81857     avg: 89449     median: 87365 (74%)     max: 100472 Points
min: 67100     avg: 76553     median: 78260 (66%)     max: 82492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9262     avg: 18183     median: 19209 (49%)     max: 22123 Points
min: 7812     avg: 12377     median: 12296 (31%)     max: 16042 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9703     avg: 25831     median: 27232 (49%)     max: 31176 Points
min: 12122     avg: 18172     median: 18321 (33%)     max: 22877 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5062     avg: 11710     median: 12399 (52%)     max: 14424 Points
min: 3678     avg: 6925     median: 6852 (29%)     max: 10150 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 2263     avg: 2267     median: 2265 (69%)     max: 2273 Points
2424 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 9278     avg: 10322     median: 10442 (41%)     max: 11247 Points
9532 Points (38%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1631     avg: 1797     median: 1830.5 (77%)     max: 1892 Points
min: 1528     avg: 1704     median: 1719 (73%)     max: 1786 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8519     avg: 12163     median: 12321.5 (22%)     max: 14376 Points
min: 6499     avg: 8967     median: 9298 (17%)     max: 10570 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1553     avg: 1681     median: 1673 (7%)     max: 1838 Points
min: 1557     avg: 1655     median: 1668 (7%)     max: 1694 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8374     avg: 10702     median: 10985 (35%)     max: 12717 Points
min: 6440     avg: 9445     median: 9907 (31%)     max: 10411 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7191     avg: 7401     median: 7199 (72%)     max: 8015 Points
min: 6698     avg: 7261     median: 7531 (75%)     max: 7554 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30682     avg: 35572     median: 35978.5 (40%)     max: 39648 Points
min: 36974     avg: 38338     median: 38187 (43%)     max: 39852 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 490     avg: 522     median: 507.5 (1%)     max: 608 ms
min: 531     avg: 555     median: 543 (1%)     max: 604 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 92.2     avg: 102.6     median: 102.6 (1%)     max: 112.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 84027     avg: 87439     median: 86645 (78%)     max: 92438 Points
min: 70338     avg: 81728     median: 83695 (75%)     max: 86881 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 239     avg: 260.3     median: 264 (76%)     max: 279 Points
min: 224     avg: 244.7     median: 247 (71%)     max: 258 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 263     avg: 297.9     median: 297.5 (62%)     max: 332 Points
min: 250     avg: 280.9     median: 283 (59%)     max: 298 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1515     avg: 1844     median: 1884 (72%)     max: 2108 Points
min: 1482     avg: 1630     median: 1662 (64%)     max: 1811 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52     avg: 110.6     median: 104.2 (18%)     max: 180 Watt
min: 30     avg: 50.2     median: 52.5 (9%)     max: 68.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 74.6     avg: 128.5     median: 124.5 (23%)     max: 222 Watt
min: 10.7     avg: 58.5     median: 60.5 (11%)     max: 89.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.05     avg: 29.7     median: 26.5 (18%)     max: 96.8 Watt
min: 4.52     avg: 7.4     median: 7 (5%)     max: 12.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.99     avg: 18.1     median: 14.8 (16%)     max: 34.3 Watt
min: 4.38     avg: 6.8     median: 7 (8%)     max: 8.33 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.6     avg: 19.8     median: 19.4 (14%)     max: 27.5 Points per Watt
min: 21.2     avg: 28.4     median: 26.4 (20%)     max: 50.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 100% n=53

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1260P → 91% n=53

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 05:25:48

#0 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14064 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.049s ... 0.05s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.022s ... 0.072s

#7 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.112s ... 0.184s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14064 +0.021s ... 0.205s

#9 got single benchmarks 14064 +0.13s ... 0.335s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.335s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.509s ... 0.844s

#12 return log +0.033s ... 0.877s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)