Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-10850K vs Intel Core i5-12600K

Intel Core i9-10850K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10850K

The Intel Core i9-10850K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.2 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.2 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz). Compared to the fastest CML-S CPU, the Core i9-10900K, the 10850K clocks 100 MHz lower (base and Turbo clocks).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is a very fast gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i5-12600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600K

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a mid-range CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 16 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz. All cores can use 20 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.45 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12600K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900 and the Core i9-10900K, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast CPU that should have no trouble running triple-A games for at least a couple of years.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 150 W.

The i5-12600K is built with Intel's fourth generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i9-10850KIntel Core i5-12600K
CodenameComet Lake-SAlder Lake
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Alder Lake-S
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-10850K « 3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 compare3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K « 2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3600 - 5200 MHz2800 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB9.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 2010 / 16
TDP125 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
Socket1200LGA1700
FeaturesTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$453 U.S.$289 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10850K
35.1 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12600K
40 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15538 Points (14%)
17491 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1314 Points (55%)
1907 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
511 Points (56%)
734 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5961 Points (15%)
6692 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2457 Points (16%)
2555 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
215 Points (60%)
275 Points (76%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.1 Points (36%)
30 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.5 Points (58%)
3.3 Points (79%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6829 Points (41%)
9381 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
58453 Points (42%)
55462 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
76123 Points (49%)
89478 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
6828 Points (8%)
15180 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
68.1 s (1%)
202.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
4.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9424 Points (15%)
6239 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
70932 MIPS (41%)
64260 MIPS (37%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5914 MIPS (70%)
5944 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
146.5 fps (49%)
148 fps (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
285.5 fps (66%)
333.5 fps (77%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
20.3 fps (36%)
30.1 fps (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (44%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.5 GB/s (43%)
2.2 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.5 GB/s (38%)
12.8 GB/s (33%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
181.2 Seconds (1%)
189.5 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15722 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.9 s (1%)
16.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
419.8 s (2%)
363.2 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
85458 Points (66%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
22639 Points (56%)
25017 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72388 Points (59%)
78037 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72353 Points (59%)
79174 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
73572 Points (61%)
77742 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19764 Points (50%)
20161 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
28058 Points (50%)
29671 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14278 Points (60%)
13869 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1401 Points (55%)
1904 Points (74%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
11436 Points (20%)
12797 Points (23%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1412 Points (6%)
1821 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11426 Points (36%)
12746 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6425 Points (64%)
8223 Points (82%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
44146 Points (44%)
46557 Points (46%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
717 ms (1%)
511 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
253 Points (45%)
293 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1637 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
302.2 Watt (52%)
256.5 Watt (44%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
259.3 Watt (47%)
205.9 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
9.5 Points per Watt (7%)
12.4 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10850K → 100% n=43

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12600K → 111% n=43

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 18. 08:10:02

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13162 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13886 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752819002s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:21:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13162 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 13162 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13886 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 13886 +0.004s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.045s ... 0.067s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.07s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)