Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8565U vs Intel Core i5-10310U

Intel Core i7-8565U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-8565U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Whiskey Lake generation that was announced in August 2018 (IFA). Compared to the similar named Kaby Lake-R processors (e.g. Core i7-8550U), the Whiskey Lake CPUs are now produced in a further improved 14nm process (14nm++) and offer higher clock speeds. The architecture and features are the same. The i7-8565U offers e.g. high Turbo clock speeds of 4,6 GHz (versus 4 GHz of the i7-8550U) for a single core and 4.1 GHz (versus 3.7 GHz) of all cores (4.1 GHz for 2 cores). The integrated GPU is still named Intel UHD Graphics 620 and the dual-channel memory controller still supports the same RAM speeds as Kaby-Lake-R (DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133). Compared to the slower Core i5-8265U and i3-8145U, the i7 supports Thermal Velocity Boost.

The Whiskey Lake SoCs are used with a new PCH produced in 14nm that supports USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) and CNVi WiFi/BT parts.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same microarchitecture compared to Skylake and Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. That means Whiskey Lake is a Kaby Lake chip manufactured in the improved 14nm++ process.

Performance

The performance of the i7-8565U depends on the cooling solution of the laptop and the defined TDP limits for short and long term performance. We already saw big differences for Kaby Lake-R (e.g., i7-8550U benchmarks), especially for long term (sustained) performance. Therefore, it will be interesting to see how the additional Turbo  clock speed can be made use of. It looks like Intel is promoting the i7 to be 3 - 11% faster than the previous i7-8550U, with Cinebench R15 Multi reaching 5% gains.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Intel Gen 9.5) is untouched from the 8th Gen Kaby Lake chips. With fast dual-channel memory, it can reach the performance of a dedicated GeForce 920M.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake and Whiskey Lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in a further improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm++), the same as the 8th Gen Coffee Lake processors. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

Intel Core i5-10310U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10310U

The Intel Core i5-10310U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i5). The processor cores are clocked between 1.7 and 4.4 GHz (unverified). Thanks to HyperThreading 8 threads can be used. Compared to the faster i5-10510U, the level 3 cache was reduced from 8 to 6 MB. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here. The CPU supports the professional management features under the vPro umbrella.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel HD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1100 MHz in the i5. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

Performance

The average 10310U in our database is not really any different than other quad-core laptop CPUs running at similar clock speeds, such as the Ryzen 5 3450U or the Core i5-1035G4.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are free to change to anything between 10 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Perhaps more importantly, short-term power consumption can be as high as 80 W or even 90 W as far as 10th gen Comet Lake U chips are concerned, making passively cooled designs unlikely.

This Intel processor is manufactured on a fairly old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-8565UIntel Core i5-10310U
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Comet Lake
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UComet Lake-U
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Core i7-8665U compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8565U « 1.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U compare1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U compare1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U compare1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U « 1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U compare1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U compare2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5205U compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1800 - 4600 MHz1700 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1528BGA1528
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NILPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8565U
29.6 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10310U
29 pt (40%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3094 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1051 Points (45%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 342     avg: 409.3     median: 411.5 (46%)     max: 472 Points
min: 411     avg: 428.2     median: 438 (49%)     max: 438 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 954     avg: 1257     median: 1181.5 (3%)     max: 1645 Points
min: 1192     avg: 1365     median: 1327 (3%)     max: 1588 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 452     avg: 612     median: 608.5 (4%)     max: 815 Points
min: 499     avg: 601     median: 546 (3%)     max: 767 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 138.3     avg: 172.5     median: 173 (52%)     max: 193 Points
min: 164     avg: 169.4     median: 170 (51%)     max: 173.8 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.09     avg: 6.3     median: 6.8 (9%)     max: 7.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.65     avg: 1.8     median: 1.9 (48%)     max: 2.16 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2682     avg: 6571     median: 6644 (40%)     max: 8906 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 13806     avg: 17608     median: 16760 (12%)     max: 23118 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 14542     avg: 21376     median: 21661 (15%)     max: 26851 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5474     avg: 8104     median: 8809.5 (11%)     max: 9435 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 263.3     avg: 353.4     median: 360.2 (4%)     max: 420 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.812     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (2%)     max: 12.41 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3537     avg: 4129     median: 4291.5 (7%)     max: 4626 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10531     avg: 17993     median: 18860 (11%)     max: 24847 MIPS
min: 15976     avg: 17406     median: 16475 (9%)     max: 19935 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2029     avg: 4558     median: 4737 (57%)     max: 5923 MIPS
min: 3615     avg: 4121     median: 4274 (51%)     max: 4398 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 29.35     avg: 33.8     median: 33.7 (12%)     max: 38.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 127.5     avg: 144.4     median: 140.9 (33%)     max: 160.2 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.24     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (8%)     max: 5.5 fps
min: 3.88     avg: 4.3     median: 4.1 (7%)     max: 5.35 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.347     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.516 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.567     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (12%)     max: 0.869 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 3.2     avg: 4.2     median: 4 (10%)     max: 5.1 GB/s
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 687     avg: 821     median: 806.5 (6%)     max: 1175 Seconds
min: 683     avg: 838     median: 864 (6%)     max: 896 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.682     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.851 sec
min: 0.703     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.806 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2813     avg: 5806     median: 6158 (13%)     max: 7928 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.286     avg: 8.5     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.889 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.9     avg: 19.3     median: 19 (1%)     max: 20.61 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 491.1     avg: 520     median: 508 (2%)     max: 583 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 16249     avg: 20521     median: 20544 (18%)     max: 25525 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3083     avg: 6977     median: 6739 (18%)     max: 9422 Points
min: 6293     avg: 6750     median: 6819.5 (18%)     max: 7069 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 18314     avg: 43687     median: 46109 (37%)     max: 58024 Points
49816 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 19795     avg: 41691     median: 40823 (33%)     max: 57796 Points
47614 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 22018     avg: 45134     median: 49602 (42%)     max: 60319 Points
60106 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2413     avg: 5785     median: 5756 (15%)     max: 8032 Points
min: 5616     avg: 7066     median: 7280.5 (18%)     max: 8087 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3409     avg: 8376     median: 8361 (15%)     max: 11865 Points
min: 7932     avg: 9613     median: 10142 (18%)     max: 11216 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1354     avg: 2953     median: 2841 (12%)     max: 3880 Points
min: 2718     avg: 2858     median: 2867 (12%)     max: 2989 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1108     avg: 1136     median: 1135.5 (48%)     max: 1163 Points
min: 1040     avg: 1100     median: 1122 (47%)     max: 1128 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2839     avg: 3074     median: 3073.5 (6%)     max: 3308 Points
min: 2821     avg: 3469     median: 3717.5 (7%)     max: 3854 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1103     avg: 1186     median: 1197 (5%)     max: 1229 Points
1040 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2643     avg: 3228     median: 3176 (10%)     max: 3803 Points
2931 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2357     avg: 5053     median: 5142.5 (51%)     max: 5547 Points
min: 4691     avg: 4815     median: 4814.5 (48%)     max: 4938 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8142     avg: 14179     median: 13888 (15%)     max: 16968 Points
min: 12023     avg: 12621     median: 12621 (14%)     max: 13219 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4701     avg: 4750     median: 4759 (65%)     max: 4791 Points
4938 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11576     avg: 13367     median: 13617.5 (33%)     max: 14655 Points
12023 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10521     avg: 12071     median: 12302.5 (22%)     max: 13703 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3340     avg: 3882     median: 3851 (75%)     max: 4820 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11720     avg: 12845     median: 12844.5 (20%)     max: 13969 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4276     avg: 4294     median: 4294 (64%)     max: 4312 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 10320     avg: 10618     median: 10617.5 (86%)     max: 10915 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 7885     avg: 8316     median: 8315.5 (75%)     max: 8746 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 11135     avg: 11197     median: 11196.5 (22%)     max: 11258 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 10347     avg: 11305     median: 11305 (23%)     max: 12263 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 10402     avg: 10600     median: 10600 (28%)     max: 10798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 730     avg: 1096     median: 1066 (1%)     max: 2622 ms
min: 929     avg: 1017     median: 938 (1%)     max: 1156 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 80.7     avg: 153.6     median: 152.7 (2%)     max: 228.3 ms
202.3 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 13935     avg: 34603     median: 34884.5 (31%)     max: 49795 Points
min: 44332     avg: 45975     median: 46029 (41%)     max: 47563 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 176     avg: 208.4     median: 202 (42%)     max: 239 Points
min: 168     avg: 191.3     median: 195 (41%)     max: 201 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 27.5     avg: 30.7     median: 31.2 (5%)     max: 33 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.8     avg: 41.3     median: 40.7 (7%)     max: 46 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 12.2     avg: 15.2     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 18.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8565U → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10310U → 103% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 15:12:19

#0 checking url part for id 10082 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12202 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.028s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 10082 +0.016s ... 0.043s

#7 got single benchmarks 10082 +0.178s ... 0.221s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12202 +0.011s ... 0.232s

#9 got single benchmarks 12202 +0.02s ... 0.252s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.252s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.253s ... 0.505s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.528s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)