Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-13700HX vs Intel Core i7-13650HX

Intel Core i7-13700HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700HX

The Intel Core i7-13700HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023 and is based on the desktop Core i7-13700K with combined 16 cores and 24 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading clocking between 2.1 - 5 GHz (4.5 GHz all core boost) and eight Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading (1.5 - 3.7 GHz). 

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i7).

The performance of the 13700HX is slightly above the old Core i7-12850HX of the Alder Lake generation (same core count, up to 4.8 GHz).

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

Intel Core i7-13650HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13650HX

The Intel Core i5-13650HX is a fast high-end mobile processor of the Raptor Lake series. Is was announced in early 2023. The CPU integrates 6 fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and 8 Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading. The P-Cores clock between 2.6 GHz (base) up to 4.9 GHz (single core boost, all-core 4.5 GHz). The smaller E-Cores clock between 1.9 and 3.6 GHz.

Compared to Alder Lake, Raptor Lake offers improved P-Cores (Raptor Cove micro-architecture) with bigger Caches and more E-Cores (same Gracemont micro-architecture). Furthermore, the chip supports faster DDR5 memory (up to 5600 MHz for the 13980HX, but only 4800 MHz for the i5).

The performance should be slightly higher than the old Core i5-12650HX (14 cores, Alder Lake architecture, up to 4.8 GHz).

The CPU is still produced in a further improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7) that allows the higher clock speeds. The power consumption is specified at 55W base power up to 157 Watt max. Turbo power.

ModelIntel Core i7-13700HXIntel Core i7-13650HX
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake-HX
Series: Raptor Lake-HX Raptor Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-13950HX compare1.6 - 5.5 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900HX compare1.6 - 5.4 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13850HX compare1.5 - 5.3 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700HX « 1.5 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600HX compare1.9 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500HX compare1.8 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13450HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13980HX compare1.6 - 5.6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13650HX « 1.9 - 4.9 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock1500 - 5000 MHz1900 - 4900 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB
L3 Cache30 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 2414 / 20
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics (Xe architecture, 16 EUs), DDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Raptor Lake-HX i7-13700HXIntel Raptor Lake-HX i7-13650HX
SocketBGA1964

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700HX
62.2 pt (69%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13650HX
64 pt (72%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 19987     avg: 20535     median: 20319 (33%)     max: 21516 Points
21006 Points (34%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1666     avg: 1762     median: 1742 (77%)     max: 1897 Points
1903 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 644     avg: 683     median: 680.5 (78%)     max: 726 Points
728 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6889     avg: 7682     median: 7781 (33%)     max: 8277 Points
7999 Points (34%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3189     avg: 3301     median: 3277 (34%)     max: 3460 Points
3136 Points (32%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 243     avg: 262     median: 264 (80%)     max: 277 Points
275 Points (84%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
37.4 Points (53%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
10616 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
68755 Points (50%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8422 Points (49%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 72220     avg: 77915     median: 76404.5 (47%)     max: 86631 MIPS
80057 MIPS (50%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5552     avg: 5941     median: 5903 (71%)     max: 6407 MIPS
6125 MIPS (73%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
175.1 fps (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
345.8 fps (81%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.5 (48%)     max: 24.5 fps
23.6 fps (51%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.6 GB/s (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.9 GB/s (54%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
16.7 GB/s (51%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 252     avg: 293     median: 287.5 (4%)     max: 345 Seconds
273 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 150     avg: 170     median: 166 (1%)     max: 198 Seconds
158 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4403     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.493 sec
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15688     avg: 17234     median: 17234 (37%)     max: 18780 Points
16051 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
370.4 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 23678     avg: 24565     median: 24362 (66%)     max: 25859 Points
24629 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 17714     avg: 19405     median: 19404.5 (49%)     max: 21095 Points
21558 Points (55%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 32973     avg: 34375     median: 34218 (63%)     max: 36091 Points
31895 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14143     avg: 15095     median: 14995.5 (74%)     max: 16247 Points
14029 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2203     avg: 2275     median: 2274.5 (79%)     max: 2346 Points
Geekbench 6 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 13087     avg: 13120     median: 13119.5 (77%)     max: 13152 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1666     avg: 1781     median: 1799 (78%)     max: 1860 Points
1838 Points (80%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14144     avg: 14755     median: 14706.5 (51%)     max: 15461 Points
14367 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1712     avg: 1728     median: 1728 (8%)     max: 1744 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13815     avg: 14596     median: 14595.5 (46%)     max: 15376 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7895 Points (82%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
52742 Points (59%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 491     avg: 519     median: 523.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
502 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 86875     avg: 91773     median: 91772.5 (87%)     max: 96670 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 247     avg: 260.5     median: 260 (78%)     max: 275 Points
277 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 238     avg: 290.5     median: 300.5 (70%)     max: 323 Points
312 Points (72%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1663     avg: 1867     median: 1869 (72%)     max: 2065 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 100.4     avg: 144.3     median: 143.5 (25%)     max: 189.7 Watt
146.8 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 183.9     avg: 185.7     median: 185.7 (39%)     max: 187.5 Watt
158 Watt (33%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 12.9     avg: 19.3     median: 19.9 (17%)     max: 24.4 Watt
16.7 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 12.1     avg: 17     median: 15.2 (18%)     max: 25.4 Watt
15 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.6     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (20%)     max: 17.7 Points per Watt
19.8 Points per Watt (23%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700HX → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13650HX → 102% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 05. 22:22:51

#0 checking url part for id 14661 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14669 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 13:55:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.018s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14661 +0.011s ... 0.029s

#7 got single benchmarks 14661 +0.019s ... 0.048s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14669 +0.007s ... 0.056s

#9 got single benchmarks 14669 +0.007s ... 0.062s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.153s ... 0.215s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.238s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)