Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1280P vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

Intel Core i7-1280P

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1280P

The Intel Core i7-1280P is the flagship Alder Lake-P CPU, which is to say, an expensive 28 W part meant for use in ultra-light (yet actively cooled) laptops. This CPU was announced in early 2022 and it has 6 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) mated to 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores are Hyper-Threading-enabled for whopping 20 threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock speeds range from 1.8 GHz to 4.8 GHz for the performance cluster and 1.3 GHz to 3.6 GHz for the efficiency cluster. This is the only hexa-core 28 W Alder Lake CPU as of February 2022, trumping what the more affordable i7-1270P and i7-1260P have in store. Full vPro feature set is supported by this Core i7 ("Enterprise" tier, allowing for remote device management).

Architecture

The i7 is a continuation of Intel's efforts to use the ARM-developed big.LITTLE technology for its own benefit. A single "little" Alder Lake core is supposed to be just as fast as a Skylake core (as found in the venerable Core i7-6700HQ among other options) which is six years old at this point. All of a Core i7-1280P's CPU cores enjoy access to 24 MB of L3 cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 64 GB of LPDDR5-5200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR4x-4267 or DDR4-3200 RAM. Just like the other 12th Gen Intel Core processors, Core i7-1280P comes with Thread Director which is a new functionality designed to help Windows 11 decide which cores to use for what workload for best performance and efficiency possible. Hardware acceleration of AI algorithms is supported via GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). PCI-Express 5.0 support has not found its way into Alder Lake P processors, so users will have to be content with PCI-Express 4.0 for the time being. Four PCI-Express 4 lanes allow for a read/write rate of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

Please note this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets soldered permanently on to the motherboard (BGA1744 socket interface).

Performance

The average 1280P in our database delivers multi-thread benchmarks scores that are most similar to those of the Ryzen 9 5900HS, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS and also the Core i9-11980HK.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 80 W, the MSI Summit E16 Flip A12UDT-031 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1280P that we know of. It can be roughly 60% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The built-in graphics adapter in the form of the 96 EU Iris Xe running at up to 1.45 GHz has seen no change from what was built into the 11th Gen Tiger Lake-UP3 processors, like a i7-1165G7, which is hardly a downside as this iGPU is loaded with modern features such as AV1 video decoding capability and SUHD 4320p monitor support. An Iris Xe Graphics G7 will let you use up to 4 monitors simultaneously, provided the laptop has the ports required.

The graphics adapter will let you play most games at 1080p / Medium settings to be very close to NVIDIA's MX350.

That being said, the Xe's gaming performance is bound to be tied to how high the Power Limits and how competent the cooling solution of a laptop are. Fast RAM is a prerequisite for decent performance as well (the Iris Xe has to make do with no dedicated video memory).

Last but not the least, we discovered that the GPU utilization when playing YouTube UHD 2160p60 videos is higher than it was with Tiger Lake chips.

Power consumption

The i7's base power consumption (also known as the default TDP value or the PL1) is 28 W, with 64 W being its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption (also known as the PL2). The "Minimum Assured" power consumption is fairly high at 20 watts. All in all, an active cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i7-1280P is built with Intel's fourth-gen 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency. This is still a rather power-hungry CPU; a single P-core will happily eat more than 20 W and even ask for more when under heavy load. A couple of higher-end 7 nm U-class AMD Ryzen 5000 chips are noticeably more modest than the i7 while delivering the same or higher performance levels.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-46-100

The Snapdragon X Plus 8-core (X1P-46-100) is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops that was unveiled in Sep 2024. This Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 4.0 GHz, along with the 2.1 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

The X1P-46-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

A lot depends on the power targets of a specific system, just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products. That being said, we fully expect the X1P-46-100 to be just a little faster than the Core i5-1245U when executing multi-threaded x86 code.

The 4.0 GHz clock speed is only achievable in single-thread workloads. When executing multi-threaded tasks, the CPU cores will run at no more than 3.4 GHz.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 2.1 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little graphics adapter has much fewer unified shaders at its disposal. Its gaming performance is set to be sufficient for pre-2021 games at resolutions such as 1600x900 on low graphics settings.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for better-than-average power efficiency, as of H2 2024.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X1-26-100

The 8-core Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) is an affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops. Unveiled in Jan 2025, this Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 2.98 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 (with no eGPU support).

The X1-26-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and some X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

The CPU should be about 10% slower than its faster brother named X1P-42 due to the latter's higher CPU clock speeds. Generally speaking, a performance level similar to recent U-class Intel Core 5 chips is to be expected.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM power consumption.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for decent power efficiency, as of H1 2025.

ModelIntel Core i7-1280PQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100
CodenameAlder Lake-POryonOryon
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-PQualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Intel Core i7-1280P « 1.3 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1270P1.6 - 4.8 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1260P1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1250P1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1240P1.2 - 4.4 GHz12 / 16 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1220P1.1 - 4.4 GHz10 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 « - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 « - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock1300 - 4800 MHz <=4000 MHz <=2980 MHz
L1 Cache1.2 MB2.3 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache11.5 MB12 MB12 MB
L3 Cache24 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 208 / 8 4.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon8 / 8
8 x 3.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
TDP28 Watt30 Watt
Technology10 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, Rem. Platf. Erase, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Architecturex86ARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1280P
36.1 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X1-26-100
28 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
96 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 646     avg: 672     median: 672 (13%)     max: 698 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8632     avg: 11685     median: 11666 (11%)     max: 14803 Points
min: 6897     avg: 7172     median: 7171.5 (7%)     max: 7446 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1609     avg: 1670     median: 1651 (69%)     max: 1787 Points
min: 975     avg: 977     median: 976.5 (41%)     max: 978 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 615     avg: 642     median: 629 (69%)     max: 701 Points
min: 359     avg: 362.5     median: 362.5 (39%)     max: 366 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3283     avg: 4627     median: 4677.5 (11%)     max: 5415 Points
min: 2644     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (7%)     max: 2842 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1905     avg: 2120     median: 2112 (13%)     max: 2332 Points
min: 1338     avg: 1371     median: 1371 (9%)     max: 1404 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 203     avg: 237.3     median: 238 (66%)     max: 258 Points
min: 181.5     avg: 183.8     median: 183.8 (51%)     max: 186 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.2 Points (33%)
14.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (73%)
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8881 Points (54%)
2299 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
46007 Points (33%)
14395 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
70566 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14362 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1168 s (14%)
308.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
34 s (7%)
9.5 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
1165 s (5%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
28 s (15%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7082 Points (11%)
9297 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 45292     avg: 49730     median: 49572 (28%)     max: 53710 MIPS
min: 29312     avg: 29610     median: 29609.5 (17%)     max: 29907 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4995     avg: 5488     median: 5540 (65%)     max: 5874 MIPS
min: 4088     avg: 4095     median: 4095 (48%)     max: 4102 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.62     avg: 12.5     median: 12.9 (23%)     max: 14.5 fps
min: 4.44     avg: 5     median: 5 (9%)     max: 5.52 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.8 GB/s (31%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 490     avg: 566     median: 537 (7%)     max: 741 Seconds
min: 791     avg: 821     median: 821 (10%)     max: 851 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 259     avg: 281.7     median: 285 (2%)     max: 309 Seconds
min: 440     avg: 458.5     median: 458.5 (3%)     max: 477 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4505     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.512 sec
min: 0.861     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.888 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6579 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7 s (2%)
20 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
43.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
995 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11415     avg: 15372     median: 15372.5 (38%)     max: 18478 Points
min: 11816     avg: 11947     median: 11946.5 (29%)     max: 12077 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7264     avg: 12588     median: 12154 (31%)     max: 17047 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15398     avg: 19695     median: 19017.5 (34%)     max: 25756 Points
min: 12446     avg: 12499     median: 12498.5 (22%)     max: 12551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6205     avg: 8459     median: 7672.5 (32%)     max: 12031 Points
5659 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2070     avg: 2106     median: 2121 (53%)     max: 2126 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10492     avg: 10553     median: 10550 (41%)     max: 10618 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1571     avg: 1701     median: 1746 (68%)     max: 1802 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9623     avg: 10839     median: 11191 (20%)     max: 11811 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1685     avg: 1706     median: 1694 (7%)     max: 1738 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9886     avg: 10561     median: 10537 (33%)     max: 11260 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7522 Points (75%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
40196 Points (40%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 526     avg: 563     median: 538 (1%)     max: 683 ms
min: 518.4     avg: 520     median: 519.5 (1%)     max: 520.6 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
95.5 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 83104     avg: 84579     median: 84578.5 (64%)     max: 86053 Points
min: 65692     avg: 68056     median: 68055.5 (51%)     max: 70419 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 232     avg: 247.2     median: 248.5 (68%)     max: 257 Points
min: 248     avg: 248.5     median: 248.5 (68%)     max: 249 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 203     avg: 271.3     median: 286 (51%)     max: 290 Points
min: 353     avg: 355     median: 355 (64%)     max: 357 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1652     avg: 1704     median: 1690 (63%)     max: 1773 Points
min: 1093     avg: 1104     median: 1103.5 (41%)     max: 1114 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 40.8     avg: 56.1     median: 54.3 (9%)     max: 73.4 Watt
59 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.3     avg: 65.3     median: 65.1 (12%)     max: 90.7 Watt
min: 41.4     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (8%)     max: 46.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.08     avg: 8.5     median: 8.7 (6%)     max: 13.6 Watt
min: 3.25     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (3%)     max: 4.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.07     avg: 10.5     median: 10.2 (11%)     max: 17.4 Watt
min: 4.16     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (5%)     max: 4.72 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.7     avg: 32.6     median: 30.3 (23%)     max: 46.8 Points per Watt
min: 28.6     avg: 31.3     median: 31.3 (23%)     max: 33.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1280P → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 16. 06:38:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14059 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18002 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18623 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752640694s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 16 Jul 2025 05:20:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14059 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 14059 +0.011s ... 0.024s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18002 +0s ... 0.025s

#11 got single benchmarks 18002 +0s ... 0.025s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18623 +0.003s ... 0.028s

#13 got single benchmarks 18623 +0.005s ... 0.033s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.07s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.07s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)