Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-11850H vs Intel Core i5-11500H

Intel Core i7-11850H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-11850H

The Intel Core i7-11800H is a high end octa core SoC for gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 generation and will be announced in mid 2021. It integrates eight Willow Cove processor cores (16 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and at 45 Watt is at 2.4 GHz. The single core boost speed can reach up to 4.6 GHz, all cores can reach up to 4.2 GHz. The CPU offers 24 MB level 3 cache and supports DDR4-3200 memory. Compared to the slower clocked i7-11800H, the 11850H offers professional management features like Intel vPro, SIPP or TXT.

Thanks to the new Tiger Lake architecture, the i9-11850H should be similar or faster than the old Intel Core i9-10875H (Comet Lake-H, 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, 16 MB L3) in single and multi threaded performance and similar to the Ryzen 9 5800H (Zen 3, 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 16 MB L3). Therefore, the i7 is well suited for even very demanding tasks.

The SoC also included the improved Xe graphics card called UHD graphics with all 32 EUs.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (20 lanes in the H45 series), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

The chip is produced in the improved 10nm process (called 10nm SuperFin) at Intel, which should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series). The default TDP is rated at 45 W at 2.4 GHz base speed, at 35 Watt the base clock speed decreases to 2 GHz (cTDP down).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

Intel Core i5-11500H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-11500H

The Intel Core i5-11500H is a high end hexa core SoC for gaming laptops and mobile workstations. It is based on the Tiger Lake H45 generation and will be announced in mid 2021. It integrates six Willow Cove processor cores (12 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP setting and at 45 Watt is specified at 2.9 GHz. The single core boost speed can reach up to 4.6 GHz, all cores can reach up to 4.2 GHz. The CPU offers 12 MB level 3 cache and supports DDR4-3200 memory. Compared to the slower clocked i5-11400H, the 11500H offers professional management features like Intel vPro, SIPP or TXT.

Thanks to the new Tiger Lake architecture, the i5-11500H should be  faster than the old Intel Core i7-10850H (Comet Lake-H, 6 cores, 2.7 - 5.1 GHz, 16 MB L3) in single and multi threaded performance and similar to the Ryzen 5 5600H (Zen 3, 6 cores, 3.3 - 4.4 GHz, 16 MB L3). Therefore, the i7 is well suited for even very demanding tasks.

The SoC also included the improved Xe graphics card called UHD graphics with all 32 EUs.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (20 lanes in the H45 series), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4/USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6E in the chip.

The chip is produced in the improved 10nm process (called 10nm SuperFin) at Intel, which should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series). The default TDP is rated at 45 W at 2.7 GHz base speed, at 35 Watt the base clock speed decreases to 2.2 GHz (cTDP down).

All articles on Tiger Lake can be found on our Tiger Lake architecture hub.

ModelIntel Core i7-11850HIntel Core i5-11500H
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Tiger Lake
CodenameTiger Lake H45Tiger Lake H45
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake H45
Intel Core i9-11980HK compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i9-11900H compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i9-11950H compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Xeon W-11955M compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1624 MB
» Intel Core i7-11850H2.5 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i7-11800H compare2.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i7-11600H compare2.9 - 4.6 GHz6 / 1218 MB
Intel Core i5-11500H2.9 - 4.6 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon W-11855M compare3.2 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1218 MB
Intel Core i5-11400H compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-11260H compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i9-11980HK compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i9-11900H compare2.5 - 4.9 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i9-11950H compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Xeon W-11955M compare2.6 - 5 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i7-11850H2.5 - 4.8 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i7-11800H compare2.3 - 4.6 GHz8 / 1624 MB
Intel Core i7-11600H compare2.9 - 4.6 GHz6 / 1218 MB
» Intel Core i5-11500H2.9 - 4.6 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Xeon W-11855M compare3.2 - 4.8 GHz6 / 1218 MB
Intel Core i5-11400H compare2.7 - 4.5 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Intel Core i5-11260H compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz6 / 1212 MB
Clock2500 - 4800 MHz2900 - 4600 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB480 KB
L2 Cache10 MB7.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 166 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1787FCBGA1787
FeaturesDL Boost, GNA, Wi-Fi 6/6e, Thunderbolt 4, DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4x-4266DL Boost, GNA, Wi-Fi 6/6e, Thunderbolt 4, DDR4-2933
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) (350 - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Tiger Lake i7-11850H

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-11850H
55.1 pt (65%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9779     avg: 10857     median: 10857 (18%)     max: 11935 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1513     avg: 1533     median: 1532.5 (76%)     max: 1552 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 583     avg: 595     median: 595 (77%)     max: 607 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3826     avg: 4245     median: 4244.5 (18%)     max: 4663 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1547     avg: 1768     median: 1767.5 (18%)     max: 1988 Points
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 232     avg: 232.5     median: 232.5 (80%)     max: 233 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44890     avg: 47721     median: 47721 (34%)     max: 50552 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5727     avg: 5745     median: 5744.5 (82%)     max: 5762 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.6     avg: 13.5     median: 13.5 (29%)     max: 14.4 fps
05101520Tooltip
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 257     avg: 285     median: 285 (2%)     max: 313 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.541     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.543 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 15788     avg: 16156     median: 16156 (56%)     max: 16524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
14425 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19959     avg: 19972     median: 19972 (49%)     max: 19985 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5654     avg: 7159     median: 7159 (38%)     max: 8664 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1659     avg: 1673     median: 1672.5 (82%)     max: 1686 Points
1507 Points (74%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9049     avg: 9250     median: 9250 (32%)     max: 9451 Points
6987 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 600     avg: 602     median: 601.5 (1%)     max: 603 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 272     avg: 274.5     median: 274.5 (72%)     max: 277 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1644 Points (71%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 86.1     avg: 90.8     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 95.4 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 90     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (26%)     max: 107 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 17.2     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (21%)     max: 18.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-11850H → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-11500H → 83% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 07. 19:29:41

#0 checking url part for id 13205 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13207 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Jul 2022 13:13:06 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.009s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#18 composed specs +0s ... 0.012s

#19 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.016s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 13205 +0s ... 0.017s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#26 got single benchmarks 13205 +0.012s ... 0.029s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 13207 +0s ... 0.029s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#30 got single benchmarks 13207 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.035s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.012s ... 0.048s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.015s ... 0.064s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.066s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.066s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s ... 0.078s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.084s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#76 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.084s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#78 return log +0.004s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)