Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10810U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3580U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3550H

Intel Core i7-10810U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10810U

The Intel Core i7-10810U is a power efficient hexa-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and appeared in March 2020. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model. The processor cores are clocked between 1.1 and 4.9 GHz. Thanks to HyperThreading 12 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The CPU supports professional management features vPro (as a difference to the i7-10710U).

Thanks to the two additional cores and the high clock rates, the processor performance of the i7-10710U is very good for its class. It should outperform the top Whiskey Lake and also Ice Lake processors if the cooling and TDP settings are not limiting.

The integrated graphics card however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel HD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

The chip is still produced on the 14nm++ process as Whiskey Lake. The TDP (PL1) is specified at 15 Watts but can be varied from 12.5 to 25 Watt from the manufacturer (cTDP up/down) resulting in different performance (especially Turbo durations). To provide the full performance, Intel proposes a short power peak of 90 W (PL4) for the i7 and therefore 8 W more than the quad-core CML-U CPUs and a whopping 19 W more than Whiskey Lake. Therefore, some slim laptops with 15W CML-U CPUs wont offer the i7 as they cant provide enough power and cooling to get full performance out of the 6 cores.

AMD Ryzen 5 3580U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3580U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, a Microsoft Surface Edition chip, is a mobile SoC that was announced in October 2019 as part of the Surface Book 15. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.2 - 3.8 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 9 graphics adapter with 9 CUs (576 Shaders) clocked at up to 1300 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3580 integrates a faster GPU with 9 instead of 8 CUs.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3580U in our extensive database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G7 and also the Core i7-10510U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a fairly decent result, as of mid 2021.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers - or should we say, Microsoft - are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. Those values are not low enough to allow for fan-free designs, for better or worse.

The CPU is built with a fairly old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3550H

The AMD Ryzen 5 3550H is a mobile SoC that was announced in January 2019. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.7 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 8 graphics adapter with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1,200 MHz. Compared to the similar Ryzen 5 3500U, the 3550H offers a 20 Watt higher TDP and therefore a better performance under long periods of load. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

The Picasso SoCs use the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows higher clock rates at similar power consumptions.

Performance

The average 3550H in our database proves to be a solid mid-range CPU, its multi-thread benchmark scores hovering close to those of the Intel Core i7-10710U and the Core i5-8257U. Which is a little slow for an H-class processor, as of late 2021, but still more than enough for the vast majority of apps and games, provided one is fine with having to wait a little longer than usual for that 4K video encoding job to get completed.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Pavilion Gaming 15-ec0002ng is among the fastest laptops powered by the 3550H that we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 5 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 35 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that value significantly with 12 W being the minimum AMD-recommended value. Clock speeds and performance would take a hit as a result; either way, that's a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

Last but not the least, the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H is built with a 12 nm process for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-10810UAMD Ryzen 5 3580UAMD Ryzen 5 3550H
CodenameComet Lake-UPicasso-U (Zen+)Picasso-U (Zen+)
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)AMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Series: Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU) Picasso-U (Zen+)
Intel Core i7-10810U « 1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5305U2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H « 2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 4900 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz2100 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache12 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt35 Watt
Technology14 nm12 nm12 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1528FP5FP5
FeaturesLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHADDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 9 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10810U
28.4 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3580U
24.8 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3550H
25.1 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3867     avg: 4311     median: 4310.5 (4%)     max: 4754 Points
min: 3646     avg: 3930     median: 3929.5 (4%)     max: 4213 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1082     avg: 1119     median: 1118.5 (47%)     max: 1155 Points
min: 850     avg: 886     median: 886 (37%)     max: 922 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 396     avg: 425.2     median: 424 (46%)     max: 447 Points
352 Points (38%)
min: 331     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (39%)     max: 370 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1498     avg: 1778     median: 1713 (4%)     max: 2344 Points
1549 Points (4%)
min: 1421     avg: 1596     median: 1621 (4%)     max: 1728 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 623     avg: 799     median: 754 (5%)     max: 1064 Points
693 Points (4%)
min: 635     avg: 717     median: 742 (5%)     max: 769 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 161     avg: 175.6     median: 182 (50%)     max: 183 Points
139 Points (39%)
min: 77     avg: 137.9     median: 144 (40%)     max: 146 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
7 Points (9%)
7.8 Points (10%)
8.6 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (46%)
1.7 Points (39%)
1.7 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6656     avg: 6927     median: 6926.5 (42%)     max: 7197 Points
4525 Points (27%)
min: 4575     avg: 5413     median: 4592 (28%)     max: 7893 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 18912     avg: 19287     median: 19286.5 (14%)     max: 19661 Points
18307 Points (13%)
min: 19002     avg: 19535     median: 19520.5 (14%)     max: 20097 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
23491 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8591 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 205.3     avg: 236.3     median: 236.3 (3%)     max: 267.369 s
274.7 s (3%)
209.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.856     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 6.952 s
7.2 s (1%)
7.7 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4747     avg: 4837     median: 4837 (8%)     max: 4927 Points
2924 Points (5%)
2929 Points (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 16072     avg: 21290     median: 21925 (13%)     max: 25244 MIPS
15209 MIPS (9%)
min: 16683     avg: 17967     median: 17978 (10%)     max: 19409 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4398     avg: 4561     median: 4498 (53%)     max: 4794 MIPS
3572 MIPS (42%)
min: 3472     avg: 3554     median: 3547.5 (42%)     max: 3652 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 39.15     avg: 39.4     median: 39.4 (13%)     max: 39.7 fps
40.1 fps (13%)
44.3 fps (15%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 141.6     avg: 147.7     median: 147.7 (34%)     max: 153.7 fps
135.3 fps (31%)
146.8 fps (34%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.81     avg: 5.3     median: 5.2 (9%)     max: 6.45 fps
4.1 fps (7%)
min: 3.7     avg: 4.1     median: 4 (7%)     max: 4.43 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.566     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (18%)     max: 0.64 GB/s
0.4 GB/s (12%)
0.5 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.956     avg: 1     median: 1 (17%)     max: 1 GB/s
0.6 GB/s (10%)
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 5.5     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (15%)     max: 5.9 GB/s
3.5 GB/s (9%)
4.7 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1346 Seconds (17%)
1297 Seconds (17%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 571     avg: 689     median: 694 (5%)     max: 875 Seconds
710 Seconds (5%)
min: 612     avg: 675     median: 659 (5%)     max: 759 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.651     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.717 sec
min: 0.732     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.752 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 6496     avg: 6843     median: 6842.5 (15%)     max: 7189 Points
5545 Points (12%)
min: 7123     avg: 7227     median: 7174 (15%)     max: 7385 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.795     avg: 8     median: 8 (2%)     max: 8.155 s
12 s (3%)
11.9 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 16.9     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (1%)     max: 18.167 s
27.2 s (1%)
27.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 476.3     avg: 511     median: 510.9 (2%)     max: 545.435 s
694 s (3%)
695 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
25128 Points (19%)
21501 Points (17%)
24607 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6537     avg: 8591     median: 8534 (21%)     max: 10599 Points
6856 Points (17%)
min: 6321     avg: 6969     median: 6803 (17%)     max: 7724 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
43938 Points (36%)
47473 Points (39%)
min: 52657     avg: 54549     median: 54658 (44%)     max: 56221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
44043 Points (36%)
48287 Points (39%)
min: 53643     avg: 54868     median: 55096 (45%)     max: 56566 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
51608 Points (43%)
52082 Points (43%)
min: 60469     avg: 61391     median: 61297 (51%)     max: 62057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6231     avg: 7704     median: 7279 (18%)     max: 10034 Points
6687 Points (17%)
min: 2848     avg: 6157     median: 6734.5 (17%)     max: 8124 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9003     avg: 10590     median: 10730 (19%)     max: 11864 Points
9805 Points (17%)
min: 10096     avg: 10671     median: 10554 (19%)     max: 11617 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2331     avg: 3331     median: 3587 (15%)     max: 4127 Points
2898 Points (12%)
min: 2996     avg: 3268     median: 3363 (14%)     max: 3534 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
1563 Points (39%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
4090 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1431 Points (45%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
3700 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1219     avg: 1240     median: 1226 (48%)     max: 1274 Points
900 Points (35%)
min: 880     avg: 896     median: 899 (35%)     max: 907 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3351     avg: 4350     median: 3934 (7%)     max: 5553 Points
2990 Points (5%)
min: 3162     avg: 3316     median: 3281 (6%)     max: 3486 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1220     avg: 1229     median: 1233 (5%)     max: 1235 Points
min: 806     avg: 886     median: 902 (4%)     max: 914 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3924     avg: 4908     median: 5168 (16%)     max: 5631 Points
min: 3034     avg: 3238     median: 3250 (10%)     max: 3562 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4762     avg: 5082     median: 5203 (52%)     max: 5281 Points
min: 3623     avg: 3797     median: 3807 (38%)     max: 3938 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19324     avg: 21447     median: 22485 (22%)     max: 22533 Points
min: 11183     avg: 12118     median: 11926 (12%)     max: 13441 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3908 Points (43%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11829 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13474     avg: 14342     median: 14437 (26%)     max: 15114 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3348     avg: 3420     median: 3353 (65%)     max: 3558 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 853     avg: 901     median: 914 (1%)     max: 968 ms
1243 ms (1%)
min: 1042     avg: 1145     median: 1173 (1%)     max: 1229 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
117.8 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
28517 Points (22%)
min: 28324     avg: 28827     median: 28811.5 (22%)     max: 29361 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
161.3 Points (44%)
124.3 Points (34%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 202     avg: 205.2     median: 206 (37%)     max: 207 Points
min: 151.3     avg: 161.1     median: 162 (29%)     max: 174 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1018 Points (38%)
832 Points (31%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 29.1     avg: 46.9     median: 46.9 (8%)     max: 64.7 Watt
41.1 Watt (7%)
min: 39.9     avg: 50.3     median: 50.3 (9%)     max: 60.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.6     avg: 53.9     median: 53.9 (10%)     max: 75.1 Watt
40 Watt (7%)
35.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.5 Watt (4%)
11.2 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
14.2 Points per Watt (11%)
17.3 Points per Watt (13%)
18.3 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10810U → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3580U → 83% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3550H → 90% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 08:07:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11935 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11514 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11151 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752818835s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:21:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11935 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 11935 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11514 +0.003s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 11514 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11151 +0.004s ... 0.03s

#13 got single benchmarks 11151 +0.013s ... 0.043s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.069s ... 0.112s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.112s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)