Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10710U vs AMD Ryzen 5 3450U vs Intel Core i7-10610U

Intel Core i7-10710U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10710U

The Intel Core i7-10710U is a power efficient hexa-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i5-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model. The processor cores are clocked between 1.1 and 4.7 GHz (all 6 cores 3.9 GHz max). Thanks to HyperThreading 12 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Thanks to the two additional cores and the high clock rates, the processor performance of the i7-10710U is very good for its class. It should outperform the top Whiskey Lake and also Ice Lake processors if the cooling and TDP settings are not limiting.

The integrated graphics card however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel HD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

The chip is still produced on the 14nm++ process as Whiskey Lake. The TDP (PL1) is specified at 15 Watts but can be varied from 12.5 to 25 Watt from the manufacturer (cTDP up/down) resulting in different performance (especially Turbo durations). To provide the full performance, Intel proposes a short power peak of 90 W (PL4) for the i7 and therefore 8 W more than the quad-core CML-U CPUs and a whopping 19 W more than Whiskey Lake. Therefore, some slim laptops with 15W CML-U CPUs wont offer the i7 as they cant provide enough power and cooling to get full performance out of the 6 cores.

AMD Ryzen 5 3450U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 3450U

The AMD Ryzen 5 3450U is a mobile SoC that was announced in Q2 2020 as a refresh. It combines four Zen+ cores (8 threads) clocked at 2.1 GHz to 3.5 GHz (-200 MHz versus 3500U) with a Radeon RX Vega 8 iGPU with 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1200 MHz.

The Picasso SoC uses the Zen+ microarchitecture with slight improvements that should lead to a 3% IPS (performance per clock) improvements. Furthermore, the 12 nm process allows for higher clocks at similar power consumption.

The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-2400 memory. As the features of the Picasso APUs are the same compared to the Raven Ridge predecessors, we point to our Raven Ridge launch article.

Performance

The average 3450U in our database is in the same league as the Core i3-1115G4 and also the Ryzen 3 4300U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a better-than-expected result for an aging lower mid-range chip that is the 3450U, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 15 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are allowed to change to anything between 12 W and 35 W if required with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. These values are fairly high, making active cooling solutions something of a necessity.

The CPU is built with a somewhat old, as of late 2022, 12 nm process for lower-than-average energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-10610U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-10610U

The Intel Core i7-10610U is a power efficient quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Comet Lake (CML-U) generation and was announced in August 2019. Compared to the similar Whiskey Lake processors (e.g. Core i7-8665U), the only difference is support for higher memory speeds (DDR4-2666 vs 2400) and two additional cores in the top model (not in this i7-10610U). The processor cores are clocked between 1.8 and 4.9 GHz (unverified). Thanks to Hyper-Threading 8 threads can be used. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Compared to the similar Core i7-10510U, the 10610U supports vPro.

The integrated graphics adapter however is still the same as in the previous generations. It should be still called Intel UHD Graphics 620 and clock from 300 - 1150 MHz in the i7. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a VP9 and H.265 de- and encoder and an integrated dual channel DDR4-2666 / LPDDR4x 2933 / LPDDR3-2133 memory controller.

Performance

The average 10610U in our database is in the same league as the Core i5-1035G1 and also the Core i5-8257U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 25 W, the HP ZBook Firefly 14 G7 is among the fastest laptops built around the 10610U that we know of. It can be about 30% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP of 15 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Laptop manufacturers are free to change that value to anything between 10 W and 25 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly. Perhaps more importantly, short-term power consumption of 10th gen Comet Lake U processors can be as high as 80 W or even 90 W, making passively cooled designs rather unlikely to appear.

Core i7-10610U is manufactured on an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm Intel process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i7-10710UAMD Ryzen 5 3450UIntel Core i7-10610U
CodenameComet Lake-UPicasso-U (Zen+)Comet Lake-U
SeriesIntel Comet LakeAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)Intel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-U
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U « 1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5305U2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Ryzen 7 3780U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U « 2.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 3580U2.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10810U1.1 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10710U1.1 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10610U « 1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10510U1.8 - 4.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10310U1.7 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10210U1.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10110U2.1 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 5305U2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron 5205U1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 4700 MHz2100 - 3500 MHz1800 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache12 MB4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm12 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1528FP5BGA1528
FeaturesLPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMELPDDR3-2133/DDR4-2666/LPDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comark.intel.com
Transistors4500 Million

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10710U
29.2 pt (49%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 3450U
23.7 pt (39%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10610U
28.5 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
4079 Points (4%)
min: 2658     avg: 2927     median: 2926.5 (3%)     max: 3195 Points
min: 3852     avg: 4049     median: 4048.5 (4%)     max: 4245 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
863 Points (36%)
min: 858     avg: 875     median: 875 (37%)     max: 892 Points
min: 1151     avg: 1207     median: 1207 (51%)     max: 1263 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 429     avg: 457.3     median: 460 (50%)     max: 480 Points
min: 292     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (35%)     max: 351 Points
min: 349     avg: 438     median: 446 (49%)     max: 482 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1181     avg: 2012     median: 2303 (6%)     max: 2598 Points
min: 1089     avg: 1168     median: 1168 (3%)     max: 1247 Points
min: 1271     avg: 1466     median: 1477 (4%)     max: 1663 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 513     avg: 957     median: 1059 (7%)     max: 1113 Points
min: 530     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (4%)     max: 603 Points
min: 548     avg: 620     median: 604.5 (4%)     max: 738 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 138     avg: 174.9     median: 176 (49%)     max: 194 Points
min: 137     avg: 137.5     median: 137.5 (38%)     max: 138 Points
min: 133     avg: 175.8     median: 178 (49%)     max: 200 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 10.89     avg: 11.7     median: 11.8 (15%)     max: 12.28 Points
7.5 Points (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.07     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (52%)     max: 2.19 Points
2.1 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6599     avg: 6972     median: 6972 (42%)     max: 7345 Points
7163 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 31463     avg: 31644     median: 31643.5 (23%)     max: 31824 Points
17253 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 171.1     avg: 174.3     median: 174.3 (2%)     max: 177.4 s
295.5 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 5.103     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (1%)     max: 5.375 s
6.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4496     avg: 4657     median: 4656.5 (7%)     max: 4817 Points
4786 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 16713     avg: 23912     median: 24493 (14%)     max: 29948 MIPS
min: 15163     avg: 15782     median: 15878 (9%)     max: 16305 MIPS
min: 15369     avg: 18407     median: 18717.5 (11%)     max: 20332 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4425     avg: 4609     median: 4642 (55%)     max: 4727 MIPS
min: 3355     avg: 3375     median: 3359 (40%)     max: 3411 MIPS
min: 3653     avg: 4460     median: 4666.5 (55%)     max: 4853 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 58.9     avg: 60.8     median: 60.5 (20%)     max: 63 fps
43.9 fps (15%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 196     avg: 202     median: 204 (47%)     max: 206 fps
183.1 fps (42%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.2     avg: 5.9     median: 5.8 (10%)     max: 7.95 fps
min: 2.77     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.43 fps
min: 4.54     avg: 4.9     median: 4.6 (8%)     max: 5.66 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.57     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (21%)     max: 0.731 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.2 (21%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
0.9 GB/s (15%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.6     avg: 6     median: 6.4 (17%)     max: 7.1 GB/s
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 468.3     avg: 649     median: 618 (4%)     max: 892 Seconds
min: 834     avg: 919     median: 946 (7%)     max: 976 Seconds
min: 641     avg: 754     median: 791 (6%)     max: 816 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.649     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.674 sec
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.806 sec
min: 0.637     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (14%)     max: 0.855 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10451 Points (22%)
8163 Points (17%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8     avg: 8.4     median: 8.2 (2%)     max: 9.071 s
7.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.69     avg: 18.7     median: 18 (1%)     max: 20.34 s
17.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 466     avg: 498.7     median: 507 (2%)     max: 523 s
467.3 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7765     avg: 10676     median: 10696 (26%)     max: 13081 Points
min: 4968     avg: 5979     median: 6400 (16%)     max: 6568 Points
min: 7306     avg: 8865     median: 8616.5 (21%)     max: 10773 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 57889     avg: 58101     median: 58101 (47%)     max: 58313 Points
min: 46042     avg: 53030     median: 53030 (43%)     max: 60018 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 58108     avg: 58126     median: 58126 (47%)     max: 58144 Points
min: 49886     avg: 54889     median: 54888.5 (45%)     max: 59891 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 59999     avg: 60053     median: 60052.5 (50%)     max: 60106 Points
27926 Points (23%)
59103 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6463     avg: 8852     median: 9476 (24%)     max: 10583 Points
min: 5106     avg: 5779     median: 5984 (15%)     max: 6248 Points
min: 5974     avg: 7273     median: 7267.5 (18%)     max: 9051 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 9496     avg: 13862     median: 14519 (26%)     max: 15892 Points
min: 8985     avg: 9259     median: 9204 (16%)     max: 9587 Points
min: 8558     avg: 10716     median: 10982 (20%)     max: 13033 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3579     avg: 4774     median: 4629.5 (20%)     max: 6256 Points
min: 1887     avg: 2208     median: 2170 (9%)     max: 2567 Points
min: 2902     avg: 3339     median: 3123 (13%)     max: 4075 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1225     avg: 1227     median: 1227 (48%)     max: 1229 Points
min: 698     avg: 819     median: 839 (33%)     max: 866 Points
min: 1155     avg: 1228     median: 1243.5 (49%)     max: 1261 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4575     avg: 5207     median: 5207 (9%)     max: 5839 Points
min: 2565     avg: 2918     median: 2972 (5%)     max: 3123 Points
min: 3731     avg: 4134     median: 4123.5 (7%)     max: 4622 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1024     avg: 1043     median: 1043 (5%)     max: 1062 Points
853 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3039     avg: 4258     median: 4258 (13%)     max: 5477 Points
2630 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3959     avg: 4615     median: 4615 (46%)     max: 5271 Points
3486 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11871     avg: 17420     median: 17420 (17%)     max: 22969 Points
10200 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5366 Points (59%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
22182 Points (32%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
22477 Points (35%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4309 Points (65%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 942     avg: 1017     median: 1041 (1%)     max: 1069 ms
min: 1170     avg: 1185     median: 1185 (1%)     max: 1200 ms
min: 807     avg: 833     median: 819.5 (1%)     max: 899 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 35243     avg: 37344     median: 37343.5 (28%)     max: 39444 Points
51613 Points (39%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
219 Points (39%)
min: 145     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (26%)     max: 146 Points
min: 190     avg: 207.5     median: 211 (38%)     max: 213 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 707     avg: 722     median: 722 (27%)     max: 737 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35.6     avg: 47.6     median: 47.2 (8%)     max: 60 Watt
37.3 Watt (6%)
min: 37.5     avg: 50.9     median: 50.9 (9%)     max: 64.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 35.1     avg: 41.1     median: 41.1 (8%)     max: 47.1 Watt
36.2 Watt (7%)
min: 47.8     avg: 57.3     median: 57.3 (10%)     max: 66.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 18.9     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (15%)     max: 22.3 Points per Watt
14.6 Points per Watt (11%)
min: 10.1     avg: 10.8     median: 10.8 (8%)     max: 11.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10710U → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 3450U → 66% n=20

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10610U → 90% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 13:22:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11461 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13235 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12200 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752837750s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:21:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11461 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 11461 +0.011s ... 0.022s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13235 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#11 got single benchmarks 13235 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12200 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#13 got single benchmarks 12200 +0.009s ... 0.043s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.092s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)