Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-10700K vs Intel Core i9-10910

Intel Core i7-10700K

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i7-10700K is a high-end desktop CPU based on the Comet Lake architecture. The CPU offers 8 cores and 16 threads clocked at 3.8 - 5.1 GHz. The TDP is rated at 125 Watt (PL1) but the PL2 is set to 229 Watt for short term boosts (up to 56 seconds).

Intel Core i9-10910

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10910

The Intel Core i9-10910 is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.0 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.6 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.0 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i7-10700KIntel Core i9-10910
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet LakeComet Lake-S
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K compare3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10910 « 3.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 compare3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz3600 - 5000 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB640 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 1610 / 20
TDP125 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1200LGA 1200
FeaturesDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXTVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86
$400 U.S.$488 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-10700K
37.8 pt (52%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10910
38.8 pt (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
496 Points (55%)
501 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4882 Points (12%)
5196 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2027 Points (13%)
2302 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
208 Points (63%)
215 Points (65%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
22.2 Points (29%)
25.6 Points (33%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (59%)
2.4 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7910 Points (48%)
8131 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
50670 Points (37%)
57842 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
64901 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10201 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
85.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.2 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
243.5 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
7.8 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8469 Points (13%)
8613 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
54050 MIPS (31%)
60747 MIPS (35%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5647 MIPS (68%)
5690 MIPS (68%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
121 fps (42%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
269 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.3 fps (29%)
16.8 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.2 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
217.4 Seconds (2%)
208 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (12%)
0.5 sec (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.2 s (1%)
16.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
391.3 s (2%)
432.5 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18064 Points (49%)
18348 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
72174 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72375 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
74085 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
18637 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
24791 Points (44%)
25520 Points (46%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10963 Points (46%)
11771 Points (50%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1371     avg: 1374     median: 1373.5 (58%)     max: 1376 Points
1381 Points (58%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8911     avg: 8925     median: 8925 (16%)     max: 8939 Points
10244 Points (18%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1368 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8903 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6247 Points (62%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
34735 Points (39%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
747 ms (1%)
737 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
55976 Points (50%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
245 Points (51%)
236 Points (49%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
207.7 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.8 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-10700K → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10910 → 104% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 07:14:59

#0 checking url part for id 12778 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12832 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12778 +0.021s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 12778 +0.013s ... 0.055s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12832 +0.019s ... 0.074s

#9 got single benchmarks 12832 +0.01s ... 0.085s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.259s ... 0.344s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 0.374s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)