Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs AMD Ryzen 5 4600H vs Intel Core i7-1068G7

Intel Core i7-1065G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC of the Ice Lake U product family designed for thin laptops and Ultrabooks. It was announced in May 2019 (Computex). The CPU has four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading) clocked at 1.3 (base) - 3.9 (single core Turbo) GHz. 2 cores can reach 3.8 GHz and all four 3.5 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock).

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The biggest improvement of Ice Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics adapter called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 EUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU from current Ryzen APUs.

Performance

The average 1065G7 in our database is most comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U and the Intel Core i5-8259U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a so-so result and a direct consequence of Intel's inability to make the best of its brand-new 10 nm node. The Core i7-10710U, a 10th generation processor built with an older 14 nm process, will easily rip a 1065G7 to pieces. That said, the 1065G7 will surely beat a 10710U in terms of energy efficiency.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and sufficiently high CPU power limits, the Galaxy Book Flex 15-NP950 is among the fastest laptops powered by the 1065G7 that we know of. It can be around 40% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Power consumption

This Core i7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value to anything between 12 W and 25 W with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, that's a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The quad-core Intel CPU is built with Intel's second-gen 10 nm process (not 10 nm SuperFin or Intel 7) for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 4600H

► remove from comparison AMD R5 4600H

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4600H integrates six of the eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3 (guaranteed base clock) to 4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (12 threads).

In addition to the six CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 6 integrated graphics adapter with 6 CUs and up to 1500 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4600H in our database matches the Intel Core i7-10875H and even the Core i9-10885H, both significantly more costly chips, in multi-thread performance, giving this Ryzen an outrageously high price-to-performance ratio.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

The Ryzen 5 chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speed and performance changing accordingly as a result. Either way, a high-performance cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The 7 nm TSMC process this APU is built with makes for better-than-average, as of early 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-1068G7

► remove from comparison Intel i7-1068G7

The Intel Core i7-1068G7 is a quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Ice-Lake-U generation that was announced in Mai 2019 (Computex). It integrates four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 2.3 (base) - 4.1 (single core Turbo) GHz. All four cores can run at up to 3.6 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock) and therefore the CPU performance should be similar to the higher clocked Whiskey-Lake and Coffee-Lake predecessors (e.g. Core i7-8559U, 2.7 - 4.5 GHz). The Core i7-1068G7 is the fastest and only 28 Watt Ice Lake-U chip at the time of announcement in 2019.

The biggest improvement for Ice-Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics card called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i7-1065G7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 CUs clocked at 300 - 1100 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU in current Ryzen APUs.

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The Core i7-1068G7 is produced in the new  10nm process at Intel that should offer a comparable performance to the 7nm process at TSMC. The TDP is specified at 28 Watts and therefore the CPU is best used in small multimedia laptops from 13-inch upwards (e.g. like a MacBook Pro 13).

ModelIntel Core i7-1065G7AMD Ryzen 5 4600HIntel Core i7-1068G7
SeriesIntel Ice LakeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)Intel Ice Lake
CodenameIce Lake-URenoir-H (Zen 2)Ice Lake U
Series: Ice Lake Ice Lake U
Intel Core i5-1038NG72 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G7 « 1.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G71.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G41.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G11 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G11.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H « 3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1068G7 « 2.3 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1034G10.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock1300 - 3900 MHz3000 - 4000 MHz2300 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB384 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 124 / 8
TDP15 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1526FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEAVX512, DL Boost, Turbo Boost 2.0
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1500 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-1065G7
29.8 pt (41%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4600H
32.4 pt (45%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
69 Points (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
499 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3127     avg: 3615     median: 3437 (3%)     max: 4281 Points
min: 7713     avg: 8161     median: 8072 (7%)     max: 8786 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1050     avg: 1131     median: 1131 (48%)     max: 1212 Points
min: 1134     avg: 1145     median: 1142.5 (49%)     max: 1161 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 358     avg: 438.1     median: 449 (50%)     max: 474 Points
min: 428     avg: 445.3     median: 449.5 (50%)     max: 454 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1081     avg: 1510     median: 1543 (4%)     max: 2024 Points
min: 3055     avg: 3233     median: 3229.5 (8%)     max: 3393 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 288     avg: 648     median: 662.5 (4%)     max: 836 Points
min: 1398     avg: 1428     median: 1425 (9%)     max: 1467 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 141     avg: 174.2     median: 178.1 (54%)     max: 190 Points
min: 172.1     avg: 176.5     median: 176 (53%)     max: 179 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5.69     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (9%)     max: 9.37 Points
16.3 Points (21%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.09     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (52%)     max: 2.17 Points
2 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7083     avg: 7254     median: 7270.5 (44%)     max: 7390 Points
5365 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 16551     avg: 21959     median: 22401.5 (16%)     max: 26481 Points
32756 Points (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 232.9     avg: 281     median: 255.6 (3%)     max: 354.4 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.969     avg: 8     median: 7.7 (2%)     max: 9.186 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4908     avg: 4953     median: 4956 (8%)     max: 4995 Points
4380 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 10406     avg: 17024     median: 17254.5 (10%)     max: 22898 MIPS
min: 36693     avg: 37768     median: 37642.5 (22%)     max: 38873 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3289     avg: 4284     median: 4393 (53%)     max: 4589 MIPS
min: 4334     avg: 4395     median: 4397 (53%)     max: 4471 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 40.6     avg: 45.1     median: 45.1 (16%)     max: 49.5 fps
82.9 fps (29%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 175.5     avg: 184.9     median: 184.9 (43%)     max: 194.3 fps
197 fps (45%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.2     avg: 4.6     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 6.38 fps
min: 9.27     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (17%)     max: 10.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.449     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.459 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.76     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.79 GB/s
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (13%)     max: 5 GB/s
5 GB/s (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
631 Seconds (8%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 675     avg: 882     median: 836 (6%)     max: 1650 Seconds
min: 337.2     avg: 351.9     median: 352 (2%)     max: 369 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.661     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.798 sec
min: 0.607     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.627 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 9122     avg: 9209     median: 9208.5 (20%)     max: 9295 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.64     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (3%)     max: 14.72 s
10.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 18.92     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (1%)     max: 27.42 s
24.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 431     avg: 481     median: 481 (2%)     max: 531 s
607 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
26223 Points (23%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3401     avg: 8138     median: 8479.5 (23%)     max: 10494 Points
min: 10904     avg: 11680     median: 11593.5 (31%)     max: 12640 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 29124     avg: 49182     median: 52060.5 (42%)     max: 54876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 29190     avg: 46812     median: 48876 (40%)     max: 54424 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52974     avg: 57448     median: 57798 (49%)     max: 60169 Points
min: 61439     avg: 63513     median: 63779 (54%)     max: 65322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5065     avg: 7011     median: 7365 (19%)     max: 8472 Points
min: 10548     avg: 11100     median: 11085.5 (28%)     max: 11681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2752     avg: 9928     median: 10445 (19%)     max: 12021 Points
min: 17769     avg: 18050     median: 18021.5 (32%)     max: 18378 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2273     avg: 3365     median: 3523 (15%)     max: 4435 Points
min: 5496     avg: 6170     median: 6251 (26%)     max: 6792 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1525 Points (46%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
6631 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948     avg: 1274     median: 1316 (56%)     max: 1348 Points
min: 1099     avg: 1115     median: 1117 (47%)     max: 1124 Points
1173 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2464     avg: 4215     median: 4406.5 (8%)     max: 4855 Points
min: 5260     avg: 6057     median: 6080 (11%)     max: 6574 Points
4449 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1184     avg: 1295     median: 1310 (6%)     max: 1334 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3375     avg: 4436     median: 4648 (15%)     max: 4839 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5239     avg: 5587     median: 5637.5 (56%)     max: 5771 Points
4964 Points (50%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14557     avg: 17869     median: 18459.5 (21%)     max: 18849 Points
25247 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5752 Points (78%)
4605 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
18772 Points (46%)
20939 Points (51%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14396 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
3863 Points (75%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 788     avg: 912     median: 861.5 (1%)     max: 1249 ms
min: 844     avg: 849     median: 848.5 (1%)     max: 855 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
88.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 25166     avg: 37201     median: 36670 (33%)     max: 53081 Points
min: 46066     avg: 47138     median: 47137.5 (42%)     max: 48209 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 130     avg: 199.4     median: 201.5 (42%)     max: 216 Points
min: 198     avg: 206     median: 207 (43%)     max: 212 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1025 Points (39%)
1061 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23.4     avg: 30.5     median: 26 (4%)     max: 48.3 Watt
66.4 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 24.1     avg: 34.8     median: 34.5 (6%)     max: 48.9 Watt
66.4 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.3 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15.5     avg: 19.1     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 25.5 Points per Watt
21.1 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1065G7 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4600H → 111% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-1068G7 → 95% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 20:43:44

#0 checking url part for id 11399 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11679 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11444 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.04s ... 0.042s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11399 +0.017s ... 0.058s

#8 got single benchmarks 11399 +0.133s ... 0.191s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11679 +0.018s ... 0.21s

#10 got single benchmarks 11679 +0.048s ... 0.258s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11444 +0.003s ... 0.26s

#12 got single benchmarks 11444 +0.005s ... 0.266s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.266s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.338s ... 0.604s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.604s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)