Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-7267U vs Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y

Intel Core i5-7267U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-7267U is a fast dual-core SoC for notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 3.1-3.5 GHz (two cores also up to 3.5 GHz). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650 GPU with 64 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

The performance of the 28-Watt CPU should be on par with the Core i7-7500U (2.7-3.5 GHz, no eDRAM, 15 Watts), but it should be a bit slower on practice due to the missing level 4 eDRAM and the lower TDP. This means the i5 is still one of the faster dual-core processors and should be sufficient for most scenarios. Some games might still require a real quad-core processor and therefore nit run perfectly on the dual-core processor, despite Hyper Threading.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 650 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 550, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for dual-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 4415Y

The Intel Pentium 4415Y is a low power entry level processor for small laptops or tablets and based on the Kaby Lake architecture. It was announced in Q2 2017 and offers two processor cores clocked at 1.6 GHz (no Turbo Boost). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. Compared to the much faster Core m3-7Y30, the Pentium 4415 offers no Turbo Boost, different CPU and GPU clock speeds, a smaller L3 cache and a higher TDP of 6 Watt.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Due to the missing Turbo Boost, the Pentium 4415Y offers a significantly worse single thread performance than the more expensive Core m3-7Y30. This should be noticeable in daily tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 850 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The TDP is rated at 6 Watt and can be reduced to 4,5 Watt (cTDP down).

ModelIntel Core i5-7267UIntel Pentium Gold 4415Y
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameKaby LakeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
» Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7130U compare2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7130U compare2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 42 MB
» Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock3100 - 3500 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP28 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1356FCBGA1515
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXT
iGPUIntel Iris Plus Graphics 650 (300 - 1050 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$304 U.S.$161 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Kaby Lake i5-7267UIntel Kaby Lake Pentium 4415Y

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
383 Points (4%)
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
164 Points (2%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
141 Points (44%)
65 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4.1 Points (8%)
1.8 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.5 Points (5%)
0.8 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5010 Points (45%)
2521 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
11403 Points (16%)
5586 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7213 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3264 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
492 s (6%)
982 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.6 s (3%)
31.1 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3243 Points (19%)
1455 Points (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
21.9 fps (9%)
11 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
119.4 fps (32%)
58.3 fps (16%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.1 fps (2%)
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.911.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (0%)
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.9 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4378 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
12.1 s (3%)
16.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
27.7 s (1%)
35.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
626 s (3%)
1240 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4896 Points (17%)
2319 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
20028 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
19576 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
44493 Points (37%)
20366 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3712 Points (9%)
1836 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
5169 Points (12%)
2541 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
2044 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3972     avg: 4182     median: 4181.5 (45%)     max: 4391 Points
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8084     avg: 8706     median: 8706 (11%)     max: 9328 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
820 ms (1%)
3077 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
110.3 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
38960 Points (40%)
11875 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
42.8 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.5 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
13 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7267U → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y → 54% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 02. 17:42:07

#0 checking url part for id 8454 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9580 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.013s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#49 composed specs +0s ... 0.014s

#50 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#51 getting avg benchmarks for device 8454 +0s ... 0.014s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#54 got single benchmarks 8454 +0.007s ... 0.022s

#55 getting avg benchmarks for device 9580 +0s ... 0.022s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#58 got single benchmarks 9580 +0.008s ... 0.031s

#59 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.013s ... 0.043s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.012s ... 0.063s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.066s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.069s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.072s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.076s

#119 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.076s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#121 return log +0.004s ... 0.08s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)