Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-7200U vs AMD FX-9830P vs AMD PRO A12-9800B

Intel Core i5-7200U

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7200U

The Intel Core i5-7200U is a dual-core processor of the Kaby Lake architecture. It offers two CPU cores clocked at 2.5 - 3.1 GHz and integrates HyperThreading to work with up to 4 threads at once. The architectural differences are rather small compared to the Skylake generation, therefore the performance per MHz is very similar. The SoC includes a dual channel DDR4 memory controller and Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics card (clocked at 300 - 1000 MHz). It is manufactured in an improved 14nm FinFET process at Intel. Compared to the old Skylake based Core i5-6200U, the i5-7200U offers a 300 MHz higher clock speed.

AMD FX-9830P

► remove from comparison AMD FX-9830P

The AMD FX-9830P is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The FX-9830P is the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 45-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-35-Watt FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2400 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the FX9830P is slightly ahead of the old 35-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with the entry-level dual-cores from Intel (Skylake and Kaby Lake). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 900 MHz (compared to 758 MHz for FX-9800P). Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the FX-9830P with 25-45 Watts, which is comparable to Intel quad-core processors from the H-series. This means the APU is a good choice for big and heavy notebooks with at least 15 inches.

AMD PRO A12-9800B

► remove from comparison AMD PRO A12-9800B

The AMD PRO A12-9800B is a mobile mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. It is the business version of the AMD FX-9800P and features the same specifications. The PRO A12-9800B is (together with the FX-9800P) the fastest Bristol Ridge APU with a 15-Watt TDP and the successor to the 15-Watt A12-8800B / FX-8800P from the Carrizo generation. The ULV chip has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules = 4 integer and 2 FP units), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to higher clocks, the A12-9800B is slightly ahead of the old 15-Watt top model FX-8800P and competes with a Intel Core i3-6100U (Skylake, 15 Watts). Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9800B with 12-15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the APU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelIntel Core i5-7200UAMD FX-9830PAMD PRO A12-9800B
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameKaby LakeBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
Intel Core i7-7700K4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-77003.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v63.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-75003.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U « 2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y751.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y571.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y541.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y321 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y301 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD FX-9830P « 3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B « 2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock2500 - 3100 MHz3000 - 3700 MHz2700 - 3600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt25-45 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm28 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1356FP4
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$281 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.com
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 268     avg: 324.5     median: 327 (2%)     max: 337 Points
301 Points (2%)
min: 222     avg: 225.3     median: 225 (1%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 88     avg: 126.3     median: 128 (39%)     max: 132 Points
93 Points (28%)
min: 75     avg: 75.7     median: 75 (23%)     max: 77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.85     avg: 3.6     median: 3.7 (5%)     max: 3.7 Points
3.6 Points (5%)
min: 2.47     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.2     avg: 1.4     median: 1.5 (36%)     max: 1.49 Points
1.1 Points (27%)
min: 0.86     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.9 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 4787     avg: 4976     median: 4985.5 (30%)     max: 5022 Points
3033 Points (18%)
min: 2564     avg: 2593     median: 2592.5 (16%)     max: 2621 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 9213     avg: 11161     median: 11308 (8%)     max: 11955 Points
9822 Points (7%)
min: 6854     avg: 7056     median: 7055.5 (5%)     max: 7257 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 11910     avg: 13678     median: 13808 (10%)     max: 14554 Points
10237 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 5663     avg: 6343     median: 6415.5 (8%)     max: 6524 Points
3499 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 460.9     avg: 495     median: 491.2 (6%)     max: 537 s
315.9 s (4%)
475.7 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 14.66     avg: 15.6     median: 15.5 (3%)     max: 17.62 s
10.3 s (2%)
13.8 s (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
464.8 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
14.9 s (8%)
1383 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 19     avg: 21.3     median: 21.6 (8%)     max: 22 fps
16.5 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 100     avg: 112.7     median: 113.1 (26%)     max: 117 fps
77 fps (18%)
0.3 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
0.3 GB/s (6%)
2 GB/s (5%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3700     avg: 4299     median: 4347.5 (9%)     max: 4407 Points
3249 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 12     avg: 12.3     median: 12.3 (3%)     max: 12.61 s
18.6 s (4%)
18.6 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 27.36     avg: 28.2     median: 28 (1%)     max: 29.69 s
43.7 s (2%)
41.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 610     avg: 645     median: 643.5 (3%)     max: 722 s
870 s (4%)
908 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 9939     avg: 11370     median: 11779 (10%)     max: 12049 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 3242     avg: 4145     median: 4107 (11%)     max: 4695 Points
min: 3051     avg: 3081     median: 3080.5 (8%)     max: 3110 Points
min: 2232     avg: 2318     median: 2275 (6%)     max: 2448 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 28394     avg: 37794     median: 37804 (31%)     max: 42974 Points
34521 Points (28%)
min: 24353     avg: 25657     median: 25657 (21%)     max: 26961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 26941     avg: 36877     median: 37260 (30%)     max: 42166 Points
31580 Points (26%)
min: 25150     avg: 25871     median: 25871 (21%)     max: 26592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 36369     avg: 41562     median: 42260 (36%)     max: 43942 Points
34398 Points (29%)
min: 27021     avg: 27778     median: 27778 (23%)     max: 28535 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2622     avg: 3414     median: 3503 (9%)     max: 3684 Points
2945 Points (7%)
min: 1989     avg: 2038     median: 2035 (5%)     max: 2089 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3866     avg: 4887     median: 4979 (9%)     max: 5252 Points
min: 3234     avg: 3787     median: 3787 (7%)     max: 4340 Points
min: 2739     avg: 2999     median: 3007 (5%)     max: 3251 Points
min: 437     avg: 439     median: 439 (2%)     max: 441 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3648     avg: 3799     median: 3809 (38%)     max: 3958 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7066     avg: 7413     median: 7516 (8%)     max: 7767 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3484     avg: 3661     median: 3630 (49%)     max: 3902 Points
2073 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6425     avg: 6947     median: 6806 (17%)     max: 7439 Points
4453 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6297     avg: 6584     median: 6480.5 (12%)     max: 6932 Points
5326 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2812     avg: 2983     median: 2906 (57%)     max: 3209 Points
2031 Points (40%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6695     avg: 6772     median: 6772 (11%)     max: 6849 Points
5575 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3037     avg: 3144     median: 3143.5 (47%)     max: 3250 Points
2109 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3270 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2974 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
7151 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6518 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5705 Points (15%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
4907 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1109     avg: 1211     median: 1196 (1%)     max: 1542 ms
min: 2152     avg: 2225     median: 2159 (3%)     max: 2363 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 77.7     avg: 124.3     median: 86.3 (1%)     max: 826 ms
123.5 ms (1%)
170.4 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 21890     avg: 29883     median: 30957 (28%)     max: 32838 Points
min: 16552     avg: 17731     median: 18206 (16%)     max: 18435 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
26.8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
25.5 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.8 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7200U → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-9830P → 94% n=21

Average Benchmarks AMD PRO A12-9800B → 79% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 18. 11:06:56

#0 checking url part for id 8152 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8165 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8544 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.047s ... 0.048s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8152 +0.004s ... 0.052s

#8 got single benchmarks 8152 +0.342s ... 0.394s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8165 +0.002s ... 0.396s

#10 got single benchmarks 8165 +0.01s ... 0.406s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 8544 +0.002s ... 0.409s

#12 got single benchmarks 8544 +0.011s ... 0.419s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.419s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.382s ... 0.801s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.802s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)