Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1155G7 vs Intel Core i9-10900K

Intel Core i5-1155G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1155G7

The Intel Core i5-1155G7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in mid 2021 as part of the refresh. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading). The base clock speed depends on the TDP settings and ranges from 1 GHz (12 Watt TDP) up to 2.5 GHz (28 Watt). Boost clock speed is 4.5 GHz.

Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (4 lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wifi 6 in the chip.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics adapter with 80 EUs based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It offers a significantly higher performance compared to the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake).

Performance

The average 1155G7 in our database proves to be a very decent mid-range processor, as of mid 2022, trading blows with the Core i7-10810U and the Ryzen 5 4500U as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. While perhaps not the best option for power users, this Core i5 will make most consumers happy, providing for short load times and generally pain-free experience.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, this is a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i5-1155G7 is built with Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for lower-than-average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-10900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10900K

The Intel Core i9-10900K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5.3 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.3 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i5-1155G7Intel Core i9-10900K
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Comet Lake
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K « 3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F compare3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock2500 - 4500 MHz3700 - 5300 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB640 KB
L2 Cache5 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache8 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 810 / 20
TDP28 Watt125 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1449LGA1200
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$488 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1155G7
31.7 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10900K
35.3 pt (59%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 5471     avg: 5625     median: 5612 (5%)     max: 5791 Points
15821 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1362     avg: 1409     median: 1419 (58%)     max: 1446 Points
1374 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 521     avg: 541     median: 550 (60%)     max: 551 Points
min: 493     avg: 516     median: 524 (57%)     max: 532 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2123     avg: 2190     median: 2173 (5%)     max: 2273 Points
min: 5825     avg: 6129     median: 6181 (15%)     max: 6381 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 858     avg: 892     median: 890 (6%)     max: 928 Points
min: 2513     avg: 2555     median: 2533 (16%)     max: 2620 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 210     avg: 210.7     median: 211 (58%)     max: 211 Points
min: 206     avg: 215.7     median: 217 (60%)     max: 224 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
29 Points (38%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.6 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8127 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
59368 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
80495 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
10625 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
66.3 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9739 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 24862     avg: 25019     median: 24992 (14%)     max: 25203 MIPS
min: 67252     avg: 69402     median: 69987 (40%)     max: 70968 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4603     avg: 4831     median: 4941 (58%)     max: 4949 MIPS
min: 5349     avg: 5705     median: 5811 (68%)     max: 5954 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
149 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
289.5 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.13     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (13%)     max: 7.55 fps
min: 18.2     avg: 19.7     median: 19.8 (35%)     max: 21 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.6 GB/s (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
14.6 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 979     avg: 1011     median: 1011 (13%)     max: 1043 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 536     avg: 547     median: 540 (4%)     max: 566 Seconds
min: 167.3     avg: 178.8     median: 179 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.605     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.616 sec
min: 0.528     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.567 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
403.4 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11355     avg: 11710     median: 11849 (29%)     max: 11925 Points
min: 20541     avg: 21539     median: 21935 (54%)     max: 22140 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74951 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
75063 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
76898 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9401     avg: 9981     median: 10243 (26%)     max: 10298 Points
min: 19766     avg: 20118     median: 20117.5 (51%)     max: 20469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14439     avg: 14655     median: 14727 (26%)     max: 14798 Points
min: 29145     avg: 29466     median: 29447 (53%)     max: 29805 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5082     avg: 5291     median: 5223 (22%)     max: 5569 Points
min: 13028     avg: 13470     median: 13056 (55%)     max: 14326 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1984 Points (46%)
1869 Points (43%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
6103 Points (24%)
7882 Points (31%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
1878 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
6243 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1461     avg: 1471     median: 1473 (50%)     max: 1480 Points
min: 1336     avg: 1404     median: 1428 (48%)     max: 1449 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5654     avg: 5747     median: 5761 (10%)     max: 5825 Points
min: 10725     avg: 11177     median: 11393 (20%)     max: 11414 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1330     avg: 1385     median: 1385 (6%)     max: 1440 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10714     avg: 11061     median: 11060.5 (35%)     max: 11407 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6195     avg: 6306     median: 6305.5 (63%)     max: 6416 Points
min: 5904     avg: 6126     median: 6126 (61%)     max: 6348 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21969     avg: 22182     median: 22182 (22%)     max: 22395 Points
min: 40236     avg: 41647     median: 41647 (41%)     max: 43058 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 669     avg: 690     median: 689 (1%)     max: 712 ms
min: 709     avg: 720     median: 721 (1%)     max: 729 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.5     avg: 190.1     median: 190.1 (49%)     max: 190.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 242     avg: 243.7     median: 244 (44%)     max: 245 Points
min: 243     avg: 251     median: 255 (46%)     max: 255 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1381     avg: 1388     median: 1388 (52%)     max: 1395 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.2     avg: 45.5     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 49.5 Watt
275.7 Watt (48%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.7     avg: 55.7     median: 58.2 (11%)     max: 58.3 Watt
268.5 Watt (49%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.17     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.48 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.5     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (4%)     max: 6.07 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 14.7     avg: 16.1     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt
9.8 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1155G7 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10900K → 177% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 29. 03:57:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13226 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12211 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761706669s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13226 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 13226 +0.01s ... 0.018s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12211 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 12211 +0.006s ... 0.027s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.059s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)