Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs Intel Core i5-8259U vs Intel Core i5-8279U

Intel Core i5-1135G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1135G7

The Intel Core i5-1135G7 is a quad-core, mid-range SoC designed to be used in ultra-light laptops. The Tiger Lake-UP3 processor was introduced in September 2020. It features four Willow Cove CPU cores running at 2.4 GHz (base clock speed @ 28 W TDP) Boosting up to 4.2 GHz (1-core Boost). The all-core Boost clock speed sits at 3.8 GHz. This is a Hyper-Threading-enabled CPU, allowing for up to 8 concurrent processing threads.

Architecture

A sizeable performance-per-MHz boost is one of the multiple strengths of Tiger Lake compared to the older Ice Lake and Comet Lake product families. Core i5-1135G7 is compatible with dual-channel DDR4-3200 or quad-channel LPDDR4x-4267 RAM, supports PCI-Express 4.0 (4 lanes) and is capable of HW-accelerating AI workloads. Thunderbolt 4, USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 support is partially baked into the chip. Four PCI-Express 4.0 lanes allow for read/write rates of up to 7.9 GB/s, provided a suitably fast NVMe SSD is used.

The i5 is manufactured on Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin that is supposedly comparable to TSMC's 7 nm process that Ryzen 4000 series laptop-grade processors are manufactured on. Both the CPU cores and the iGPU enjoy access to 8 MB of L3 cache. Higher-end Core i7-11x5 processors are notable for their larger Level 3 cache (12 MB versus 8 MB), faster iGPUs and higher clock speeds. Core i5-1135G7 is supposed to be permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1449 socket interface) and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

The average i5-1135G7 in our database delivers multi-thread benchmark scores close to those of the Core i7-10810U, Core i5-1145G7, Core i5-1230U and also the Ryzen 7 3780U. The performance may not be ground-breaking, but it’s still on the sunnier side. This Core i5 will have no difficulty coping with some light gaming and video editing on the go, and the usual web browsing and spreadsheet editing will pose no problem to it, either.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term CPU power limit of 25 W, the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14ITL05 is among the fastest laptops built around the 1135G7 that we know of. It can be about 60% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

The 80 EU Iris Xe Graphics G7 is based on Intel's Gen 12 architecture. The iGPU is somewhat faster than the older Iris Plus G7 (Ice Lake) and much faster than the UHD 620 (Comet Lake). The 80 EUs are clocked at 400 MHz to 1,300 MHz. This graphics adapter can drive up to 4 monitors in resolutions up to SUHD 4320p@60 and hardware decode the AVC, HEVC, VP9 and last but not the least AV1 video streams. The iGPU's gaming performance is close to what a typical GeForce MX250 has in store; casual gamers will be happy with the Xe as it will easily handle most titles at 720p on low or medium quality settings. An important thing to keep in mind is that the iGPU has no video memory of its own, making fast RAM a necessity.

Power consumption

Just like all other Tiger Lake-UP3 chips, the i5-1135G7 has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, these values are a tad too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The CPU is built with Intel's 3rd generation 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for decent, as of mid 2022, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i5-8259U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8259U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i5-7267U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.3 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 3.8 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to faster Core i5 and i7 models with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8259U only features 6 MB smart cache and the slowest clock of the Iris Plus GPU.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Considering the clocks of the Core i5-8259U, its performance should be between the 15W models Core i5-8350U and Core i7-8550U. The i5-8259U should still be faster than the i7-8550U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz (slowest clock of the 655, the fastest is 1200 MHz in combination with the i7-8559U) and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

Intel Core i5-8279U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-8279U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in the first quarter of 2019. Compared to its predecessor Core i5-7287U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.4 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 4.1 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors. 

Compared to faster Core i7 model (e.g. Core i7-8559U) with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8279U only features 6 MB smart cache and a slower clock of the Iris Plus GPU.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Considering the clocks of the Core i5-8259U, its performance should be between above the 15W model Core i7-8650U. The i5-82769U should still be faster than the i7-8650U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads. Compared to the similar named Intel Core i5-8269U, the 8279U offers a slightly lower performance (-200 MHz Turbo, -100 MHz base) although the name suggests otherwise.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1150 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.

ModelIntel Core i5-1135G7Intel Core i5-8259UIntel Core i5-8279U
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameTiger Lake-UP3Coffee Lake-UCoffee Lake-U
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-U
Intel Core i7-1195G72.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G73 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G72.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G72.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G72.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 « 2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G42 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G43 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8559U2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U « 2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8559U2.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8557U1.7 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8269U2.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8279U « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8259U2.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8257U1.4 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8109U3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4200 MHz2300 - 3800 MHz2400 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache320 KB256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache5 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 84 / 8
TDP28 Watt28 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1449FCBGA1528FCBGA1528
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1300 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1050 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1135G7
32.4 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8259U
27.6 pt (38%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2786     avg: 4724     median: 4894 (5%)     max: 6136 Points
min: 3592     avg: 3792     median: 3728 (3%)     max: 4025 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1062     avg: 1322     median: 1345 (57%)     max: 1373 Points
min: 959     avg: 976     median: 976.5 (42%)     max: 991 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 375     avg: 507     median: 515 (57%)     max: 527 Points
min: 369     avg: 378     median: 381 (42%)     max: 386 Points
421 Points (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 979     avg: 1827     median: 1859 (5%)     max: 2382 Points
min: 1385     avg: 1473     median: 1471 (4%)     max: 1567 Points
1717 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 431     avg: 792     median: 822 (5%)     max: 941 Points
min: 575     avg: 622     median: 615 (4%)     max: 687 Points
min: 743     avg: 750     median: 750 (5%)     max: 757 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 141.4     avg: 194.4     median: 198 (60%)     max: 205 Points
min: 132     avg: 147.1     median: 148.7 (45%)     max: 154 Points
min: 166     avg: 167.5     median: 167.5 (50%)     max: 169 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 6.37     avg: 8.5     median: 9.3 (12%)     max: 9.72 Points
7.1 Points (9%)
8.3 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.31     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (58%)     max: 2.36 Points
1.7 Points (42%)
1.9 Points (48%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8116     avg: 8143     median: 8116 (49%)     max: 8198 Points
5706 Points (34%)
6551 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 20445     avg: 24311     median: 25271 (18%)     max: 27216 Points
21869 Points (16%)
24096 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 24499     avg: 30750     median: 30749.5 (21%)     max: 37000 Points
27377 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 10395     avg: 10455     median: 10455 (13%)     max: 10515 Points
7397 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 231.3     avg: 259.1     median: 259.1 (3%)     max: 286.835 s
248.6 s (3%)
266.1 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 6.525     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 6.799 s
7.5 s (2%)
8.6 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4185     avg: 6282     median: 5283 (8%)     max: 9377 Points
5348 Points (8%)
5862 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 14745     avg: 21407     median: 21892.5 (13%)     max: 24873 MIPS
min: 17799     avg: 20778     median: 19104.5 (11%)     max: 28824 MIPS
22683 MIPS (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3924     avg: 4674     median: 4723.5 (56%)     max: 4921 MIPS
min: 3753     avg: 3949     median: 3975.5 (48%)     max: 4022 MIPS
4276 MIPS (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 36.7     avg: 41.4     median: 41.4 (14%)     max: 46.1 fps
min: 38.5     avg: 39.5     median: 39.5 (14%)     max: 40.5 fps
45.7 fps (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 165.55     avg: 182.5     median: 182.5 (42%)     max: 199.5 fps
min: 162.3     avg: 165.1     median: 165.1 (38%)     max: 167.95 fps
190 fps (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.57     avg: 5.9     median: 6 (10%)     max: 7.6 fps
min: 4.72     avg: 5.2     median: 5.4 (9%)     max: 5.49 fps
6 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.384     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.449 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.593     avg: 0.7     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.774 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 4.2     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (14%)     max: 5.3 GB/s
4.1 GB/s (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 1046     avg: 1263     median: 1254 (16%)     max: 1548 Seconds
1331 Seconds (17%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 499     avg: 662     median: 649.5 (5%)     max: 1044 Seconds
min: 688     avg: 730     median: 729.5 (5%)     max: 769 Seconds
627 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.619     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.727 sec
min: 0.738     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (17%)     max: 0.818 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7455     avg: 8274     median: 8274 (18%)     max: 9093 Points
7916 Points (17%)
8830 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.015     avg: 8.1     median: 8.1 (2%)     max: 8.093 s
11.1 s (2%)
9.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.61     avg: 17.7     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 17.81 s
24.3 s (1%)
21.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 388     avg: 405.6     median: 412.7 (2%)     max: 416.065 s
589 s (3%)
512 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
22734 Points (20%)
25093 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6423     avg: 9300     median: 9456 (26%)     max: 11623 Points
min: 7105     avg: 8348     median: 8528.5 (23%)     max: 9276 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 38873     avg: 55717     median: 58666 (48%)     max: 63164 Points
min: 47878     avg: 49579     median: 49578.5 (40%)     max: 51279 Points
21476 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 39405     avg: 55009     median: 59162 (48%)     max: 63612 Points
min: 47855     avg: 49509     median: 49509 (40%)     max: 51163 Points
21581 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 54397     avg: 63114     median: 64419 (54%)     max: 65372 Points
min: 17718     avg: 40451     median: 49722 (42%)     max: 53914 Points
24185 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4680     avg: 7779     median: 8064 (20%)     max: 9304 Points
min: 5946     avg: 6904     median: 6670.5 (17%)     max: 7927 Points
7017 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1015     avg: 11403     median: 11896 (21%)     max: 13480 Points
min: 8348     avg: 9726     median: 9743 (17%)     max: 11006 Points
10411 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2664     avg: 3871     median: 3850 (16%)     max: 5262 Points
min: 2752     avg: 3096     median: 3132 (13%)     max: 3346 Points
3439 Points (14%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1147     avg: 1373     median: 1384 (58%)     max: 1428 Points
min: 948     avg: 961     median: 951 (40%)     max: 984 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3475     avg: 4663     median: 4688 (8%)     max: 5472 Points
min: 3359     avg: 3602     median: 3607 (6%)     max: 3839 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1156     avg: 1365     median: 1379 (6%)     max: 1407 Points
min: 944     avg: 957     median: 948 (4%)     max: 979 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3937     avg: 4752     median: 4761.5 (15%)     max: 5268 Points
min: 3335     avg: 3571     median: 3567 (11%)     max: 3811 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5194     avg: 5874     median: 5911 (59%)     max: 6081 Points
min: 4200     avg: 4265     median: 4211 (42%)     max: 4383 Points
4850 Points (48%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16405     avg: 18945     median: 18889 (21%)     max: 20747 Points
min: 13421     avg: 14122     median: 13961 (16%)     max: 14984 Points
17643 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 710     avg: 739     median: 721.5 (1%)     max: 1273 ms
min: 1010     avg: 1054     median: 1068 (1%)     max: 1095 ms
740 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 137.6     avg: 152.5     median: 143.3 (2%)     max: 176.5 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 39503     avg: 57825     median: 58147 (52%)     max: 62664 Points
44259 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 171.3     avg: 179.9     median: 180.4 (52%)     max: 186.4 Points
140.3 Points (40%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 151     avg: 226.1     median: 226.5 (47%)     max: 244 Points
min: 173.3     avg: 176.9     median: 176 (37%)     max: 182.4 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1058     avg: 1176     median: 1169.5 (45%)     max: 1293 Points
954 Points (37%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20     avg: 37     median: 37.4 (6%)     max: 56.8 Watt
min: 36.1     avg: 42     median: 39.5 (7%)     max: 50.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.4     avg: 42.4     median: 42.6 (8%)     max: 61.2 Watt
min: 37.6     avg: 44.2     median: 43.7 (8%)     max: 51.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.47     avg: 4.6     median: 3.8 (3%)     max: 7.02 Watt
13.9 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.56     avg: 6.4     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 14.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 15     avg: 19.2     median: 18.2 (14%)     max: 32.1 Points per Watt
min: 12.4     avg: 13.9     median: 13.9 (10%)     max: 15.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1135G7 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8259U → 86% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8279U → 89% n=30

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 14:16:11

#0 checking url part for id 12238 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10068 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11503 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.038s ... 0.039s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12238 +0.016s ... 0.055s

#8 got single benchmarks 12238 +0.268s ... 0.323s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10068 +0.017s ... 0.34s

#10 got single benchmarks 10068 +0.017s ... 0.358s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11503 +0.003s ... 0.36s

#12 got single benchmarks 11503 +0.007s ... 0.367s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.367s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.493s ... 0.861s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.861s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)