Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1035G1 vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

Intel Core i5-1035G1

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1035G1

The Intel Core i5-1035G1 is a low-power, Ice Lake family processor (SoC) featuring 4 cores, 8 threads, 6 MB of L3 cache and the UHD G1 (32 EUs) iGPU. It saw the light of day in H2 2019. The chip is designed for use in highly portable laptops; its CPU cores run at 1.0 GHz to 3.6 GHz, with only 3.2 GHz achievable if all the cores are loaded.

Unlike the costlier Core i5-1035G4, the 1035G1 has the 32 EU UHD Graphics G1 iGPU at its disposal as opposed to the more powerful 48 EU Iris Plus G4; CPU cores run at a slightly lower clock rate in the case of the 1035G1, too.

Architecture & Features

Ice Lake family chips are powered by Sunny Cove CPU cores.The latter aim to do what Palm Cove cores (that we never really got a chance to get a taste of) were expected to do, delivering a double-digit IPC uplift over the venerable Skylake architecture thanks to a range of small improvements across the board including scheduler improvements, larger caches and buffers, and support for new instruction sets.

Thunderbolt 3 support is built right into the Core i5 (meaning the latter has several PCIe 3 lanes exclusive to Thunderbolt devices, reducing the number of additional components required for Thunderbolt to work) and so is Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 support (making it easier for Intel to sell its proprietary WLAN cards to laptop makers). The Core i5-1035G1 also has the DL Boost and GNA features for applications centered around machine learning.

The 4 GT/s bus is indicative of a consumer-grade chip, since CPUs for gaming laptops and portable workstations usually employ the faster 8 GT/s bus. RAM support is nothing to sneeze at, at up to DDR4-3200 or LPDDR4-3733. NVMe SSDs are supported, with data transfer rates limited to 3.9 GB/s (this is what four PCIe 3 lanes are good for). SATA drives and even eMMC chips are also natively supported here.

This is not a user-replaceable CPU, as it gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1526 socket interface).

OS support is limited to 64-bit Windows 10 and Windows 11, as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

The Core i5-1035G1 is a lower mid-range CPU, as of mid 2022. It is good for more than just the basics while being no match for true high-performers such as the mighty Core i7-10850H.

According to our in-house testing, the Core i5 delivers multi-thread performance that is similar to what the Core i7-10610U, the Core i7-1160G7 and the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U have to offer. Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is and how high the CPU power limits are.

The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 is among the fastest laptops featuring the 1035G1 that we have tested.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics G1 is based on Intel's Gen 11 architecture. The UHD Graphics runs at up to 1,050 MHz and has 32 EUs for fairly unimpressive performance; the Iris Plus G4 has 48 EUs while the Iris Plus G7 has 64 EUs, for reference. This iGPU will drive up to 3 monitors simultaneously and is DX12-compatible. The resolution options are capped at 5120 by 3200. There is no hardware AV1 codec support here, meaning such a video will be SW-decoded with rather low energy efficiency. The usual HEVC, AVC and VP9 codecs are supported, thankfully.

The UHD Graphics is significantly faster than the UHD Graphics 620, yet it's still not as good as a proper discrete graphics card would be. It will let one play certain games, F1 2020 included, provided one is content with the 720p resolution and low quality settings.

Power consumption

The Core i5-1035G1 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to increase that value somewhat, with 25 W being the upper limit, or reduce it (values as low as 13 W are possible). Clock speeds and performance will change accordingly as a result. Either way, an active cooling solution will be required to dissipate the heat.

The chip is manufactured on Intel's second-generation 10 nm process (not "10 nm SuperFin" or "Intel 7") for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900H

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. At the time of announcement in March 2020 it is the fastest model of the 4000H series. The R9 4900H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to  4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900H is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800H. The CPU is clocked 400 MHz (base +14%) to 200 MHz (boost +5%) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900H should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 12 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 45 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops.

AMD Ryzen 7 4800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800H is a Renoir APU designed for larger, more powerful laptops with room for better termals. The Ryzen features eight Zen 2 cores running at 2.9 GHz (base clock speed) to 4.2 GHz (Boost). The CPU also has 8 MB of L3 cache and a Vega series integrated GPU. Thread-doubling SMT tech is enabled in this processor, allowing for up to 16 concurrent processing threads.

Architecture

Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and in part thanks to this fact AMD promises an up to 2x higher performance-per-watt figure compared to Ryzen 3000 series mobile APUs. This isn't the only noteworthy change however as Zen 2 architecture is leagues ahead of the outgoing Zen+ when it comes to single-core performance. Renoir family processors feature up to 8 CPU cores compared to 4 cores of the previous generation mobile AMD CPUs.

A 4800H will work with dual-channel DDR4-3200 or quad-channel LPDDR4-4266 RAM. The important difference between desktop Ryzen 4000 and mobile Ryzen 4000 processors is that the latter do not have PCI-Express 4.0 support, meaning those blazing-fast NVMe SSDs will be limited to a throughput of 3.9 GB/s.

The Ryzen 7 gets soldered straight to the motherboard (FP6 socket) and is thus not user-replaceable. Please go to our Renoir processor family hub for more information on these CPUs.

Performance

The average 4800H in our database is in the same league as the Core i7-11850H, the Core i7-1360P and also the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This highlights just how great of a job Renoir designers did, back in the day.

Thanks to its decent cooling solution and a long-term power limit of 45 W, the MSI Alpha 17 A4DEK is among the fastest laptops built around the 4800H that we know of. It can be more than 20% faster in CPU-bound workloads than the slowest system featuring the same chip in our database, as of August 2023.

Graphics

Ryzen 7 4800H features the Radeon RX Vega 7, a 7 CU integrated graphics adapter running at up to 1,600 MHz. The iGPU's underlying architecture is fairly old as of 2021, yet its 448 shaders will let you play many games of 2020 and 2021 as long as you stick to reasonable resolutions and presets. F1 2021 runs well at medium quality, 1080p resolution, to give you an example. A Vega 7 can be as fast as a GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, or as slow as an 80 EU Iris Xe; this depends on the benchmark as well as on cooling system performance and TDP settings of a laptop as mentioned above. As the iGPU has no VRAM of its own, it is paramount that fast system RAM is used.

The Vega definitely supports UHD 2160p monitors at 60 Hz. This iGPU is capable of hardware decoding AVC, HEVC and VP9-encoded videos. There is no AV1 support to be found here though. Such a video will have to be SW-decoded leading to much lower energy efficiency.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W. Laptop makers are allowed to change that to anything between 35 W and 54 W, with clock speeds and performance changing accordingly as a result. The Ryzen 7 4800HS is a 35 W edition of the Ryzen 7 4800H that trades away a bit of performance for lower power consumption. In both cases, an active cooling solution is a must.

Both the 4800H and the 4800HS are built with TSMC's 7 nm process for decent, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-1035G1AMD Ryzen 9 4900HAMD Ryzen 7 4800H
SeriesIntel Ice LakeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameIce Lake-URenoir-H (Zen 2)Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-H (Zen 2)
Intel Core i5-1038NG72 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G71.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G71.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G41.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G1 « 1 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G11.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H « 3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H « 2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3600 MHz3300 - 4400 MHz2900 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 168 / 16
TDP15 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1526FP6FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (300 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1035G1
28.6 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900H
35.4 pt (49%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800H
35.1 pt (49%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
4027 Points (4%)
min: 11416     avg: 11604     median: 11604 (11%)     max: 11792 Points
min: 9644     avg: 10889     median: 11135.5 (10%)     max: 11642 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1016 Points (43%)
min: 1290     avg: 1294     median: 1294 (55%)     max: 1298 Points
min: 1248     avg: 1254     median: 1253.5 (53%)     max: 1259 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 382     avg: 419.3     median: 428 (48%)     max: 431 Points
min: 482     avg: 493.5     median: 493.5 (55%)     max: 505 Points
min: 462     avg: 482.1     median: 485 (54%)     max: 491 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1178     avg: 1409     median: 1311 (3%)     max: 1873 Points
min: 4233     avg: 4409     median: 4409 (11%)     max: 4585 Points
min: 3692     avg: 4275     median: 4339.5 (11%)     max: 4663 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 518     avg: 613     median: 606 (4%)     max: 803 Points
min: 1886     avg: 1927     median: 1926.5 (12%)     max: 1967 Points
min: 1652     avg: 1859     median: 1854 (12%)     max: 1995 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 144     avg: 164.6     median: 167.5 (50%)     max: 171 Points
min: 192     avg: 193     median: 193 (58%)     max: 194 Points
min: 186     avg: 188     median: 188 (57%)     max: 191 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.8 Points (8%)
23 Points (30%)
min: 19.95     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (27%)     max: 21.92 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
2.2 Points (56%)
min: 2.16     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (54%)     max: 2.19 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6687     avg: 6870     median: 6869.5 (42%)     max: 7052 Points
5946 Points (36%)
min: 5643     avg: 5684     median: 5684 (34%)     max: 5725 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 17213     avg: 21299     median: 21298.5 (15%)     max: 25384 Points
40253 Points (29%)
min: 37236     avg: 37276     median: 37276 (27%)     max: 37316 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21753 Points (15%)
65380 Points (45%)
min: 61208     avg: 62934     median: 62933.5 (44%)     max: 64659 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9192 Points (11%)
10173 Points (12%)
min: 9712     avg: 9782     median: 9781.5 (12%)     max: 9851 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
454.1 s (5%)
82.9 s (1%)
90.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.8 s (2%)
3.2 s (1%)
3.4 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3800 Points (6%)
4297 Points (7%)
4601 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 13236     avg: 15975     median: 15156 (9%)     max: 20378 MIPS
48976 MIPS (28%)
min: 44827     avg: 49860     median: 50075 (29%)     max: 53883 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3739     avg: 4089     median: 4159 (50%)     max: 4318 MIPS
4727 MIPS (57%)
min: 4575     avg: 4678     median: 4686 (56%)     max: 4743 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
111 fps (39%)
min: 101.5     avg: 102.7     median: 102.7 (36%)     max: 103.9 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
215 fps (50%)
min: 209     avg: 215.6     median: 215.6 (50%)     max: 222.2 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.32     avg: 4.4     median: 4.2 (7%)     max: 6.44 fps
12.9 fps (23%)
min: 10.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.8 (22%)     max: 14.1 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
1.2 GB/s (0%)
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (11%)
2 GB/s (34%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.2 GB/s (11%)
7.4 GB/s (19%)
10.3 GB/s (27%)
247.3 Seconds (2%)
min: 248     avg: 266     median: 262 (2%)     max: 299 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.705     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.769 sec
0.6 sec (12%)
min: 0.562     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.603 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12018     avg: 12683     median: 12683 (27%)     max: 13348 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
25.5 s (6%)
9.5 s (2%)
9.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
45.6 s (2%)
24.1 s (1%)
22.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
789 s (4%)
729 s (3%)
564 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
18472 Points (16%)
64532 Points (57%)
min: 51446     avg: 57673     median: 57672.5 (50%)     max: 63899 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5453     avg: 7214     median: 6880 (19%)     max: 8817 Points
12199 Points (33%)
min: 11401     avg: 14657     median: 15160 (41%)     max: 15838 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 43489     avg: 48198     median: 50440 (41%)     max: 50664 Points
63266 Points (51%)
min: 60191     avg: 61331     median: 61331 (50%)     max: 62471 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50941     avg: 51362     median: 51361.5 (42%)     max: 51782 Points
63416 Points (51%)
min: 59769     avg: 62130     median: 62130 (50%)     max: 64491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 50897     avg: 52961     median: 53092 (45%)     max: 54764 Points
69343 Points (58%)
min: 65802     avg: 66827     median: 67127 (57%)     max: 67553 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5430     avg: 6846     median: 6878 (17%)     max: 8047 Points
15719 Points (40%)
min: 13135     avg: 15479     median: 15669 (40%)     max: 16818 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8019     avg: 9970     median: 10188 (18%)     max: 11678 Points
20613 Points (37%)
min: 19980     avg: 21647     median: 21847 (39%)     max: 22687 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2659     avg: 3321     median: 3282 (14%)     max: 4121 Points
6523 Points (27%)
min: 6255     avg: 8706     median: 8925 (38%)     max: 9631 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1142     avg: 1195     median: 1219 (51%)     max: 1240 Points
min: 1230     avg: 1232     median: 1231.5 (52%)     max: 1233 Points
min: 1154     avg: 1188     median: 1191 (50%)     max: 1207 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3337     avg: 3892     median: 3858 (7%)     max: 4372 Points
min: 7224     avg: 8012     median: 8012 (14%)     max: 8800 Points
min: 5920     avg: 7725     median: 7955 (14%)     max: 8672 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 936     avg: 1090     median: 1136 (5%)     max: 1199 Points
1237 Points (5%)
min: 1177     avg: 1184     median: 1184 (5%)     max: 1191 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2972     avg: 3566     median: 3505 (11%)     max: 4221 Points
7624 Points (24%)
min: 6027     avg: 7108     median: 7108 (22%)     max: 8189 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4909     avg: 5125     median: 5183 (52%)     max: 5224 Points
5287 Points (53%)
min: 4808     avg: 4950     median: 4949.5 (49%)     max: 5091 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13605     avg: 14977     median: 15042.5 (17%)     max: 16219 Points
28402 Points (32%)
min: 23108     avg: 26453     median: 26453 (29%)     max: 29798 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 834     avg: 934     median: 913 (1%)     max: 1043 ms
767 ms (1%)
min: 783     avg: 826     median: 791 (1%)     max: 1220 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 34726     avg: 35438     median: 35437.5 (32%)     max: 36149 Points
min: 37080     avg: 43309     median: 43309 (39%)     max: 49538 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 173     avg: 183.2     median: 178 (37%)     max: 195 Points
227 Points (47%)
min: 204     avg: 217.7     median: 218.5 (46%)     max: 229 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.5     avg: 29.6     median: 29.6 (5%)     max: 33.7 Watt
73.2 Watt (13%)
min: 62     avg: 76.6     median: 83 (14%)     max: 84.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.4     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (5%)     max: 31.7 Watt
105.3 Watt (19%)
min: 81     avg: 84     median: 84 (15%)     max: 86.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 22.1     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (18%)     max: 25.3 Points per Watt
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)
min: 20.9     avg: 22.1     median: 22.1 (16%)     max: 23.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1035G1 → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900H → 180% n=42

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800H → 179% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 25. 05:45:20

#0 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11929 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11677 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.064s ... 0.065s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.065s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.024s ... 0.089s

#8 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.137s ... 0.226s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11929 +0.022s ... 0.248s

#10 got single benchmarks 11929 +0.015s ... 0.263s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11677 +0.017s ... 0.28s

#12 got single benchmarks 11677 +0.133s ... 0.413s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.413s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.624s ... 1.037s

#15 return log +0s ... 1.037s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)