Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-1035G1 vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800U vs AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS

Intel Core i5-1035G1

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1035G1

The Intel Core i5-1035G1 is a low-power, Ice Lake family processor (SoC) featuring 4 cores, 8 threads, 6 MB of L3 cache and the UHD G1 (32 EUs) iGPU. It saw the light of day in H2 2019. The chip is designed for use in highly portable laptops; its CPU cores run at 1.0 GHz to 3.6 GHz, with only 3.2 GHz achievable if all the cores are loaded.

Unlike the costlier Core i5-1035G4, the 1035G1 has the 32 EU UHD Graphics G1 iGPU at its disposal as opposed to the more powerful 48 EU Iris Plus G4; CPU cores run at a slightly lower clock rate in the case of the 1035G1, too.

Architecture & Features

Ice Lake family chips are powered by Sunny Cove CPU cores.The latter aim to do what Palm Cove cores (that we never really got a chance to get a taste of) were expected to do, delivering a double-digit IPC uplift over the venerable Skylake architecture thanks to a range of small improvements across the board including scheduler improvements, larger caches and buffers, and support for new instruction sets.

Thunderbolt 3 support is built right into the Core i5 (meaning the latter has several PCIe 3 lanes exclusive to Thunderbolt devices, reducing the number of additional components required for Thunderbolt to work) and so is Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 support (making it easier for Intel to sell its proprietary WLAN cards to laptop makers). The Core i5-1035G1 also has the DL Boost and GNA features for applications centered around machine learning.

The 4 GT/s bus is indicative of a consumer-grade chip, since CPUs for gaming laptops and portable workstations usually employ the faster 8 GT/s bus. RAM support is nothing to sneeze at, at up to DDR4-3200 or LPDDR4-3733. NVMe SSDs are supported, with data transfer rates limited to 3.9 GB/s (this is what four PCIe 3 lanes are good for). SATA drives and even eMMC chips are also natively supported here.

This is not a user-replaceable CPU, as it gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1526 socket interface).

OS support is limited to 64-bit Windows 10 and Windows 11, as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

The Core i5-1035G1 is a lower mid-range CPU, as of mid 2022. It is good for more than just the basics while being no match for true high-performers such as the mighty Core i7-10850H.

According to our in-house testing, the Core i5 delivers multi-thread performance that is similar to what the Core i7-10610U, the Core i7-1160G7 and the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U have to offer. Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is and how high the CPU power limits are.

The Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15IIL05 is among the fastest laptops featuring the 1035G1 that we have tested.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics G1 is based on Intel's Gen 11 architecture. The UHD Graphics runs at up to 1,050 MHz and has 32 EUs for fairly unimpressive performance; the Iris Plus G4 has 48 EUs while the Iris Plus G7 has 64 EUs, for reference. This iGPU will drive up to 3 monitors simultaneously and is DX12-compatible. The resolution options are capped at 5120 by 3200. There is no hardware AV1 codec support here, meaning such a video will be SW-decoded with rather low energy efficiency. The usual HEVC, AVC and VP9 codecs are supported, thankfully.

The UHD Graphics is significantly faster than the UHD Graphics 620, yet it's still not as good as a proper discrete graphics card would be. It will let one play certain games, F1 2020 included, provided one is content with the 720p resolution and low quality settings.

Power consumption

The Core i5-1035G1 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term Power Limit) of 15 W. Laptop makers are free to increase that value somewhat, with 25 W being the upper limit, or reduce it (values as low as 13 W are possible). Clock speeds and performance will change accordingly as a result. Either way, an active cooling solution will be required to dissipate the heat.

The chip is manufactured on Intel's second-generation 10 nm process (not "10 nm SuperFin" or "Intel 7") for average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 4800U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800U

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800U is a processor for thin and light laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800U integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 1.8 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. Compared to the similar named Ryzen 7 4800H, the 4800U offers a lower TDP (15 versus 45 Watt) and base clock (1.8 versus 2.9 GHz).

According to AMD, the Ryzen 7 4800U is 4% faster in Cinebench R20 single thread test and 90 % faster in the multithreaded test compared to the fast Intel Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake, 4 cores, 3.9 GHz). This means the CPU should be one of the fastest processors in the 15 Watt TDP range and well suited for demanding tasks. The sustained performance however ist strongly depending on the cooling system and the TDP settings of the laptop.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs and up to 1750 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 15 Watt (default) and can be configured from 10 to 25 Watt by the laptop vendor. That means the chip is intended for thin and light laptops (but with fans).

AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 4800HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. The 4800HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 2.9 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.2 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT for a total of 16 threads. The chip is manufactured on the modern 7 nm TSMC process and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips. The 4800HS is the 35 Watt version (-10 Watt) of the Ryzen 7 4800H.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 7 integrated graphics adapter with 7 CUs at up to 1,600 MHz. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 8 MB of L3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

Performance

The average 4800HS in our database is an impressively fast CPU that isn't afraid of picking a fight with the Intel Core i9-10980HK and the Core i7-11850H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. The Ryzen is fast enough for nearly all apps and games you could possibly throw at it, as of mid 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 35 W. Which is too high to allow for passively cooled setups.

The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS is built with TSMC's 7 nm process leading to average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i5-1035G1AMD Ryzen 7 4800UAMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
SeriesIntel Ice LakeAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
CodenameIce Lake-URenoir-U (Zen 2)Renoir-HS (Zen 2)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-HS (Zen 2)
Intel Core i5-1038NG72 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1065G71.3 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G71.2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G41.1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1035G1 « 1 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1005G11.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4980U2 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800U « 1.8 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U2 - 4.1 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U2.2 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U2.1 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U2.3 - 4 GHz6 / 6 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U2.7 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS « 2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3600 MHz1800 - 4200 MHz2900 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache6 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 88 / 168 / 16
TDP15 Watt15 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1526FP6FP6
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (300 - 1050 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1035G1
28.6 pt (40%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800U
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800HS
34.6 pt (48%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
4027 Points (4%)
min: 7558     avg: 8565     median: 8376 (8%)     max: 9762 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1016 Points (43%)
min: 1231     avg: 1235     median: 1235 (53%)     max: 1240 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 382     avg: 419.3     median: 428 (48%)     max: 431 Points
min: 474     avg: 480.5     median: 480 (53%)     max: 488 Points
482 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1178     avg: 1409     median: 1311 (3%)     max: 1873 Points
min: 2943     avg: 3178     median: 3230.5 (8%)     max: 3306 Points
3869 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 518     avg: 613     median: 606 (4%)     max: 803 Points
min: 1281     avg: 1444     median: 1411 (9%)     max: 1639 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1701     median: 1700.5 (11%)     max: 1767 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 144     avg: 164.6     median: 167.5 (50%)     max: 171 Points
min: 182     avg: 184     median: 183 (55%)     max: 187 Points
min: 186     avg: 186.5     median: 186.5 (56%)     max: 187 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
5.8 Points (8%)
17.8 Points (23%)
19.9 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2 Points (49%)
2.2 Points (53%)
2.2 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6687     avg: 6870     median: 6869.5 (42%)     max: 7052 Points
5690 Points (34%)
5705 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 17213     avg: 21299     median: 21298.5 (15%)     max: 25384 Points
33649 Points (24%)
36313 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
21753 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9192 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
454.1 s (5%)
99.5 s (1%)
91.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.8 s (2%)
3.6 s (1%)
4.1 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3800 Points (6%)
3881 Points (6%)
4642 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 13236     avg: 15975     median: 15156 (9%)     max: 20378 MIPS
min: 38654     avg: 41192     median: 40117 (23%)     max: 44804 MIPS
48392 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3739     avg: 4089     median: 4159 (50%)     max: 4318 MIPS
min: 4420     avg: 4486     median: 4436 (53%)     max: 4603 MIPS
4655 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
88.5 fps (31%)
99 fps (35%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
196.1 fps (45%)
216.5 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 3.32     avg: 4.4     median: 4.2 (7%)     max: 6.44 fps
min: 9.48     avg: 10.2     median: 10.4 (18%)     max: 10.77 fps
12 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.4 GB/s (0%)
1.1 GB/s (0%)
1.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (11%)
1.5 GB/s (26%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.2 GB/s (11%)
10.2 GB/s (27%)
10.3 GB/s (27%)
min: 322     avg: 345.3     median: 340 (2%)     max: 374 Seconds
284 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.705     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.769 sec
min: 0.576     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.613 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10227 Points (22%)
12785 Points (27%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
25.5 s (6%)
9.7 s (2%)
9.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
45.6 s (2%)
22.9 s (1%)
22.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
789 s (4%)
585 s (3%)
561 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
18472 Points (16%)
50726 Points (44%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 5453     avg: 7214     median: 6880 (19%)     max: 8817 Points
min: 11658     avg: 12133     median: 12201 (33%)     max: 12541 Points
14924 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 43489     avg: 48198     median: 50440 (41%)     max: 50664 Points
58600 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 50941     avg: 51362     median: 51361.5 (42%)     max: 51782 Points
58705 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 50897     avg: 52961     median: 53092 (45%)     max: 54764 Points
67233 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5430     avg: 6846     median: 6878 (17%)     max: 8047 Points
min: 11486     avg: 13163     median: 13102 (33%)     max: 14901 Points
16062 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8019     avg: 9970     median: 10188 (18%)     max: 11678 Points
min: 16762     avg: 18139     median: 17885 (32%)     max: 19769 Points
21217 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2659     avg: 3321     median: 3282 (14%)     max: 4121 Points
min: 6229     avg: 6498     median: 6514 (27%)     max: 6750 Points
min: 8264     avg: 8441     median: 8440.5 (36%)     max: 8617 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1142     avg: 1195     median: 1219 (51%)     max: 1240 Points
min: 1150     avg: 1164     median: 1156.5 (49%)     max: 1192 Points
min: 1188     avg: 1191     median: 1190.5 (50%)     max: 1193 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3337     avg: 3892     median: 3858 (7%)     max: 4372 Points
min: 5798     avg: 6255     median: 6136.5 (11%)     max: 6950 Points
min: 7540     avg: 7611     median: 7611 (14%)     max: 7682 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 936     avg: 1090     median: 1136 (5%)     max: 1199 Points
1162 Points (5%)
1196 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2972     avg: 3566     median: 3505 (11%)     max: 4221 Points
7298 Points (23%)
7878 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4909     avg: 5125     median: 5183 (52%)     max: 5224 Points
min: 4919     avg: 4963     median: 4963 (50%)     max: 5007 Points
min: 5114     avg: 5134     median: 5134 (51%)     max: 5154 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13605     avg: 14977     median: 15042.5 (17%)     max: 16219 Points
min: 27166     avg: 27287     median: 27286.5 (30%)     max: 27407 Points
min: 28937     avg: 29224     median: 29223.5 (33%)     max: 29510 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 834     avg: 934     median: 913 (1%)     max: 1043 ms
min: 793     avg: 810     median: 816 (1%)     max: 822 ms
786 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 34726     avg: 35438     median: 35437.5 (32%)     max: 36149 Points
36619 Points (33%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 173     avg: 183.2     median: 178 (37%)     max: 195 Points
min: 205     avg: 210.7     median: 208 (43%)     max: 219 Points
214 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.5     avg: 29.6     median: 29.6 (5%)     max: 33.7 Watt
min: 37     avg: 42.1     median: 38.6 (7%)     max: 50.8 Watt
64.2 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 25.4     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (5%)     max: 31.7 Watt
min: 33.7     avg: 39.3     median: 34.8 (6%)     max: 49.5 Watt
65.1 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 22.1     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (18%)     max: 25.3 Points per Watt
min: 33.1     avg: 37.2     median: 38 (28%)     max: 40.5 Points per Watt
25.1 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1035G1 → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800U → 157% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS → 174% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 23:00:08

#0 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11681 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11689 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.056s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.022s ... 0.078s

#8 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.115s ... 0.193s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11681 +0.02s ... 0.213s

#10 got single benchmarks 11681 +0.019s ... 0.231s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11689 +0.017s ... 0.248s

#12 got single benchmarks 11689 +0.026s ... 0.275s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.275s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.518s ... 0.793s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.793s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)