Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10320 vs Intel Core i5-10400F vs Intel Core i9-10850K

Intel Core i3-10320

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10320

The Intel Core i3-10320 is an entry level quad-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake-S architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.8 and 4.6 GHz and can execute up to eight threads with its four cores simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The performance is similar to the old high end Intel Core i7-7700K due to the same architecture and similar clock speeds. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 90 Watt are consumed (PL2 for 28s).

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i9-10850K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10850K

The Intel Core i9-10850K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.6 and 5.2 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.2 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz). Compared to the fastest CML-S CPU, the Core i9-10900K, the 10850K clocks 100 MHz lower (base and Turbo clocks).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is a very fast gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

ModelIntel Core i3-10320Intel Core i5-10400FIntel Core i9-10850K
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet LakeComet Lake-S
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-S
Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10320 « 3.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10850K « 3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-101003.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4600 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz3600 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB384 KB640 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1.5 MB2.5 MB
L3 Cache7.9 MB12 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 86 / 1210 / 20
TDP65 Watt65 Watt125 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1200LGA12001200
FeaturesHyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3TVB, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, Quick Sync, Virtualization
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1150 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630
Architecturex86x86x86
$162 U.S.$155 U.S.$453 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-10320
32.2 pt (45%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10850K
40.2 pt (56%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5986 Points (6%)
15538 Points (14%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1185 Points (50%)
1314 Points (56%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
458 Points (51%)
438 Points (49%)
511 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2320 Points (6%)
3201 Points (8%)
5961 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
949 Points (6%)
1332 Points (8%)
2457 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
188 Points (57%)
180 Points (54%)
215 Points (65%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
10.5 Points (14%)
14.4 Points (19%)
28.1 Points (37%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (52%)
2 Points (50%)
2.5 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7164 Points (43%)
6719 Points (41%)
6829 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
28383 Points (21%)
36564 Points (26%)
58453 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
47901 Points (33%)
76123 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8849 Points (11%)
6828 Points (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
134.7 s (2%)
68.1 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9424 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
25864 MIPS (15%)
36731 MIPS (21%)
70932 MIPS (41%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4899 MIPS (59%)
5064 MIPS (61%)
5914 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
58.8 fps (21%)
81.2 fps (28%)
146.5 fps (51%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
218 fps (50%)
228.5 fps (53%)
285.5 fps (66%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.2 fps (14%)
11.2 fps (20%)
20.3 fps (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (16%)
2.5 GB/s (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.3 GB/s (14%)
14.5 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
469 Seconds (3%)
332.4 Seconds (2%)
181.2 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (14%)
0.6 sec (13%)
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
9911 Points (21%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.2 s (1%)
16.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
516 s (2%)
470.4 s (2%)
419.8 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
10518 Points (28%)
14539 Points (39%)
22639 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
63063 Points (51%)
62086 Points (50%)
72388 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
61795 Points (50%)
72353 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62883 Points (53%)
73572 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
9675 Points (24%)
11914 Points (30%)
19764 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
13564 Points (24%)
28058 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4368 Points (18%)
7548 Points (32%)
14278 Points (60%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (51%)
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
1401 Points (59%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4846 Points (9%)
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
11436 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1217 Points (5%)
1412 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6349 Points (20%)
11426 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
5587 Points (56%)
6425 Points (64%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
25403 Points (28%)
44146 Points (49%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
784 ms (1%)
849 ms (1%)
717 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
160 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
224 Points (47%)
215 Points (45%)
253 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1254 Points (48%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
115 Watt (20%)
135.8 Watt (23%)
302.2 Watt (52%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
96.3 Watt (18%)
125.5 Watt (23%)
259.3 Watt (47%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.9 Points per Watt (7%)
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)
9.5 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10320 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 117% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10850K → 171% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 01:13:59

#0 checking url part for id 14009 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13162 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.033s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14009 +0.021s ... 0.054s

#8 got single benchmarks 14009 +0.01s ... 0.064s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.019s ... 0.083s

#10 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.012s ... 0.094s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13162 +0.019s ... 0.113s

#12 got single benchmarks 13162 +0.008s ... 0.121s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.121s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.48s ... 0.601s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.601s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)