Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i9-10900K vs Intel Core i5-10400F

Intel Core i3-10100

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i3-10100 is a four-core desktop processor based on the Comet Lake S architecture. The processor clocks at 3.6 - 4.3 GHz and can process up to 8 threads simultaneously. The Intel Core i3-10100 is manufactured in the improved 14nm process (14nm++). Compared to the older i3-9100 (Comet Lake-S), the 10100 offers a 100 MHz higher turbo clock, multithreading and support for faster DDR4-2666 memory.

Performance

The performance should be only slightly above the Core i3-9100 in the entry level for desktop CPUs. Thus the performance is sufficient for office and undemanding gaming.

Graphics Card

The Intel Core i3-10100 is a processor with a rather slow entry level integrated graphics unit (Intel UHD Graphics 630). 

Power consumption

Intel puts the Thermal Design Power (TDP) at 65 watts. This means there is no need for large cooling systems, which also allows installation in very compact housings.

Intel Core i9-10900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10900K

The Intel Core i9-10900K is a high-end processor for desktops with ten cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 3.7 and 5.3 GHz (all 10 cores up to 4.8 GHz) and can execute up to twenty threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.3 GHz can be only achieved below 70°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost of 100 MHz).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9900K, the 10900K offers increased clock speeds and two more cores. Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the CPU is the fastest gaming CPU available at the time of announcement. Using all cores, the i9 however is slower than the top Ryzen CPUs (like the Ryzen 9 3950X) which offer more cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9900K. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 125 Watts (PL1) but under full load up to 250 Watt are consumed (PL2). In default mode these 250 Watt and therefore high clock speeds can be maintained for up to 56 seconds, however, all boards offer the option to alter these settings.

Intel Core i5-10400F

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10400F

The Intel Core i5-10400F is a mid-range processor for desktops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-S, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.9 and 4.3 GHz and can execute up to 12 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading.

The processor is still manufactured on the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is made with the same 14 nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2666 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10400F in our database matches the Ryzen 7 4800U and also the Core i7-9700K in multi-thread performance to be a more than decent mid-range option for your gaming rig, as of early 2022.

Graphics

The CPUs with an "F" suffix do not feature an integrated graphics adapter. The Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is deactivated.

Power consumption

This Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 65 W which is in line with most desktop chips.

The i5-10400F is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for poor, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core i3-10100Intel Core i9-10900KIntel Core i5-10400F
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-SComet LakeComet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake
Intel Core i9-10850K3.6 - 5.2 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-109103.6 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i3-103203.8 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores7.9 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100 « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K « 3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10900K3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-107002.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F « 2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4300 MHz3700 - 5300 MHz2900 - 4300 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB640 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache6 MB20 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 810 / 206 / 12
TDP65 Watt125 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
Die Size126 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFCLGA1200LGA1200LGA1200
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4-2666 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, vPro, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3
Architecturex86x86x86
$130 U.S.$488 U.S.$155 U.S.
Announced
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10900K
40.4 pt (56%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10400F
33.2 pt (46%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15821 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1374 Points (58%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
436 Points (48%)
min: 493     avg: 516     median: 524 (58%)     max: 532 Points
438 Points (49%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2181 Points (5%)
min: 5825     avg: 6129     median: 6181 (15%)     max: 6381 Points
3201 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
895 Points (6%)
min: 2513     avg: 2555     median: 2533 (16%)     max: 2620 Points
1332 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
181 Points (55%)
min: 206     avg: 215.7     median: 217 (65%)     max: 224 Points
180 Points (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.9 Points (13%)
29 Points (38%)
14.4 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (51%)
2.6 Points (64%)
2 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6863 Points (41%)
8127 Points (49%)
6719 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
26903 Points (19%)
59368 Points (43%)
36564 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
34987 Points (24%)
80495 Points (56%)
47901 Points (33%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
8914 Points (11%)
10625 Points (13%)
8849 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
194.1 s (2%)
66.3 s (1%)
134.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.3 s (1%)
3.6 s (1%)
6.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6124 Points (10%)
9739 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 24319     avg: 24356     median: 24355.5 (14%)     max: 24392 MIPS
min: 67252     avg: 69402     median: 69987 (40%)     max: 70968 MIPS
36731 MIPS (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4797     avg: 4853     median: 4853 (58%)     max: 4909 MIPS
min: 5349     avg: 5705     median: 5811 (69%)     max: 5954 MIPS
5064 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
55.8 fps (19%)
149 fps (52%)
81.2 fps (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
212.5 fps (49%)
289.5 fps (67%)
228.5 fps (53%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.7     avg: 7.7     median: 7.7 (14%)     max: 7.78 fps
min: 18.2     avg: 19.7     median: 19.8 (35%)     max: 21 fps
11.2 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
1.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.9 GB/s (15%)
2.6 GB/s (45%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5 GB/s (13%)
14.6 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 492.2     avg: 493.7     median: 493.7 (3%)     max: 495.1 Seconds
min: 167.3     avg: 178.8     median: 179 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
332.4 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.634     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.652 sec
min: 0.528     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.567 sec
0.6 sec (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.9 s (2%)
7.2 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20 s (1%)
16 s (1%)
19.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
481.8 s (2%)
403.4 s (2%)
470.4 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20541     avg: 21539     median: 21935 (59%)     max: 22140 Points
14539 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 61562     avg: 74373     median: 74373 (60%)     max: 87184 Points
74951 Points (61%)
62086 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 61702     avg: 74370     median: 74369.5 (60%)     max: 87037 Points
75063 Points (61%)
61795 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 62930     avg: 74011     median: 74011 (62%)     max: 85092 Points
76898 Points (65%)
62883 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9394     avg: 16477     median: 16477 (42%)     max: 23560 Points
min: 19766     avg: 20118     median: 20117.5 (51%)     max: 20469 Points
11914 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 13268     avg: 24581     median: 24581 (44%)     max: 35894 Points
min: 29145     avg: 29466     median: 29447 (53%)     max: 29805 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5274     avg: 5304     median: 5303.5 (22%)     max: 5333 Points
min: 13028     avg: 13470     median: 13056 (55%)     max: 14326 Points
7548 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1171     avg: 1188     median: 1187.5 (50%)     max: 1204 Points
min: 1336     avg: 1404     median: 1428 (60%)     max: 1449 Points
min: 1217     avg: 1220     median: 1220 (51%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4740     avg: 4758     median: 4758 (9%)     max: 4776 Points
min: 10725     avg: 11177     median: 11393 (20%)     max: 11414 Points
min: 6358     avg: 6365     median: 6365 (11%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1167     avg: 1184     median: 1183.5 (5%)     max: 1200 Points
min: 1330     avg: 1385     median: 1385 (6%)     max: 1440 Points
1217 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4724     avg: 4748     median: 4748 (15%)     max: 4772 Points
min: 10714     avg: 11061     median: 11060.5 (35%)     max: 11407 Points
6349 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5494     avg: 5563     median: 5563 (56%)     max: 5632 Points
min: 5904     avg: 6126     median: 6126 (61%)     max: 6348 Points
5587 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 18622     avg: 18692     median: 18692 (21%)     max: 18762 Points
min: 40236     avg: 41647     median: 41647 (46%)     max: 43058 Points
25403 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 833     avg: 836     median: 835.5 (1%)     max: 838 ms
min: 709     avg: 720     median: 721 (1%)     max: 729 ms
849 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 202     avg: 207.5     median: 207.5 (43%)     max: 213 Points
min: 243     avg: 251     median: 255 (53%)     max: 255 Points
215 Points (45%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 108.5     avg: 115.2     median: 115.2 (20%)     max: 121.9 Watt
275.7 Watt (48%)
135.8 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 96.7     avg: 101.9     median: 101.9 (19%)     max: 107.1 Watt
268.5 Watt (49%)
125.5 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9.3 Points per Watt (7%)
9.8 Points per Watt (7%)
10.6 Points per Watt (8%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100 → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10900K → 161% n=35

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10400F → 113% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 22:19:41

#0 checking url part for id 12793 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12211 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12714 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.026s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12793 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#8 got single benchmarks 12793 +0.009s ... 0.038s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12211 +0.017s ... 0.055s

#10 got single benchmarks 12211 +0.012s ... 0.067s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12714 +0.015s ... 0.083s

#12 got single benchmarks 12714 +0.006s ... 0.089s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.402s ... 0.491s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.491s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)