Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom x7-Z8700 vs Intel Pentium N4200 vs Intel Atom x7-Z8750

Intel Atom x7-Z8700

► remove from comparison Intel Z8700

The Intel Atom x7-Z8700 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in March 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom Z3795, the Atom x7-Z8700 offers about 5 percent more performance and is similar fast as an AMD A6-6210 APU or high-end ARM SoCs, e.g. the Snapdragon 810 or Exynos 7420.

Using Windows, the performance is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet or Office, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 16 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and will handle older and less demandig Windows games (e.g. Counter-Strike: GO) in low settings at decent frame rates. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance somewhere between the Qualcomm Adreno 330 / PowerVR G6430 and the Adreno 420 / PowerVR GX6450.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Pentium N4200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium N4200 is an Apollo Lake family, quad-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its four cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.5 GHz, with only 2.4 GHz available when all the cores are fully loaded; there is no Hyper-Threading here and thus no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 505, and eats very little (~6 W).

Curiously enough, Intel keeps making and selling the Pentium as of early 2023.

Architecture

Just like other Celeron N, Celeron J, Pentium N, Pentium J processors, this Pentium is notable for its small die size. It is easy to manufacture, lowering the costs and enabling Intel to compete with various ARM-based products such as the Raspberry Pi series.

The Pentium N4200 features the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture that came to replace Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements. There is still no L3 cache to be found here, however, it now takes less cycles to perform many operations, making for a double-digit IPC improvement.

The Pentium is compatible with DDR3L-1866, LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400 RAM. Intel's guidelines state that up to 8 GB are supported; that being said, various forum users report that the CPU functions just fine if mated to 16 GB and even 32 GB of RAM. The chip features six PCI-Express 2.0 lanes for connecting various devices, meaning a four-lane NVMe SSD will not be able to deliver a data transfer rate of more than 2 GB/s. eMMC and SATA storage is supported natively, too.

This Intel CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. However, Microsoft only allows Windows 11 to be installed on systems with CPUs released in 2017 or later, making 64-bit Windows 10 the only OS that the Pentium is officially compatible with.

Last but not the least, please keep in mind that this is not a user-replaceable CPU. It gets permanently soldered to the motherboard (BGA1296 socket interface).

Performance

The average N4200 in our database competes with the Core i5-3339Y, a power efficient chip launched in 2013, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned, with the (much less ancient) Celeron 6305 lurking a little behind the two. In other words, the Pentium is a slow processor suitable for the most basic tasks only. As of 2021, it is light years behind the latest processors making use of high-performance architectures, such as the Zen 2-powered AMD Ryzen 3 5300U.

The Acer Aspire ES 17 ES1-732 is among the fastest laptops built around the N4200 that we know of. It can be around 50% faster than the slowest system featuring the same CPU in our database, depending on the circumstances.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 505 (18 EUs) is a rather good iGPU, considering this is a lower-end SoC released in 2016 we are talking about. As far as the feature set is concerned, the HD 505 is not much different from the HD Graphics 520 or any other graphics adapter that full-blown six-generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 chips have. This iGPU is compatible with DX12; it will drive up to 3 monitors simultaneously at up to 2160p60. It will also happily decode VP9 and AVC, the two codecs that YouTube mostly relies on as of 2021.

The UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz. Its actual clock speed will be much lower than that, since the small power budget has to be shared between the iGPU and the CPU cores. Expect most games to run terrible, even ones that were released in 2012 or 2010.

Power consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, the Pentium N4200 has a default TDP of 6 W (also known as the Power Limit 1), making it a great option for passively cooled systems. Increasing the PL1 by just one or two watts, which many systems built around Apollo Lake allow one to do, improves the chip's performance by a huge margin, speaking subjectively.

This Pentium is built with a 14 nm Intel process making for poor energy efficiency (considering 14 nm processes are really old as of mid 2022).

Intel Atom x7-Z8750

► remove from comparison Intel Z8750

The Atom x7-Z8750 is a quad-core SoC for entry-level laptops and passive-cooled tablets, which has been presented in early 2016. It is clocked at 1.1 - 2.56 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail. In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Compared to the similar Pentium N3710, the Atom x7-Z8750 is tuned for less power consumption and offers less PCI-Express lanes (2 instead of 4) and less USB 3.0 ports (3 instead of 5). Furthermore, the integrated GPU clocks only at 600 (instead of 700) MHz and the memory controller supports LPDDR3-1600.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Due to the passive cooling and lower TDP, the Atom x7-Z8750 is a bit slower than the similar clocked Pentium N3710. The boost frequency of the CPU cores wont be used as long as in an average Pentium based laptop. However, if TDP and cooling are similar, the performance should be comparable. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet browsing or office applications, but may struggle in more demanding software or multitasking.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 16 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle demanding 3D games of 2015. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is not rated with a TDP, but only an SDP (Scenario Design Power) of 2 Watt (N3710 SDP 4 Watt, TDP 6 Watt). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelIntel Atom x7-Z8700Intel Pentium N4200Intel Atom x7-Z8750
SeriesIntel Atom x7Intel PentiumIntel Atom x7
CodenameCherry TrailApollo LakeCherry Trail
Series: Atom x7 Cherry Trail
Intel Atom x7-Z87501.6 - 2.56 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x7-Z8700 « 1.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x7-Z8750 « 1.6 - 2.56 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom x7-Z87001.6 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1600 - 2400 MHz1100 - 2500 MHz1600 - 2560 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C90 °C
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 3x USB 3.0, 2x PCIe 2.0DDR3L-1866/LPDDR3-1866/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AESIntel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell, 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 3x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 505 (200 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
TDP6 Watt
SocketBGA1296UTFCBGA1380
$161 U.S.$37 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 Z8750 +
612 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 Z8750 +
208 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 Z8750 +
78 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 Z8750 +
220 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 98     avg: 116     median: 116 (1%)     max: 134 Points
133 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 37     avg: 37.5     median: 37.5 (11%)     max: 38 Points
38.9 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 0.72     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.79 Points
min: 2.02     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (3%)     max: 2.27 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 0.36     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.46 Points
min: 0.64     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.66 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 1003     avg: 1114     median: 1114 (7%)     max: 1225 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
min: 1876     avg: 3116     median: 3116 (2%)     max: 4356 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
2458 Points (2%)
min: 7699     avg: 7766     median: 7766 (5%)     max: 7833 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 Z8700 +
1311 Points (2%)
min: 2375     avg: 2392     median: 2392 (3%)     max: 2409 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
24.5 s (5%)
min: 20.13     avg: 22.6     median: 22.6 (5%)     max: 25.03 s
24.7 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 704     avg: 714     median: 714 (8%)     max: 724 s
99%
1 Z8750 +
772 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
944 Points (1%)
85%
1 Z8750 +
807 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
10.3 fps (4%)
12 fps (4%)
10 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
50.8 fps (12%)
60 fps (14%)
48 fps (11%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 Z8750 +
0.6 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
80%
1 Z8750 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (4%)
88%
1 Z8750 +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.4 GB/s (4%)
68%
1 Z8750 +
1 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 Z8750 +
4929 Seconds (35%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 Z8750 +
2.7 sec (59%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2636 Points (6%)
92%
1 Z8750 +
2426 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
49.8 s (11%)
31.4 s (7%)
36.4 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
96.7 s (4%)
68.4 s (3%)
80.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1453 s (6%)
99%
1 Z8750 +
1734 s (8%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4306 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 493     avg: 1186     median: 1186 (3%)     max: 1879 Points
1499 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z8700 +
2570 Points (2%)
min: 15955     avg: 18834     median: 18514.5 (15%)     max: 22351 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9441     avg: 16242     median: 17153 (14%)     max: 21222 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17050     avg: 22089     median: 22096 (19%)     max: 26889 Points
89%
1 Z8750 +
19651 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
237 Points (1%)
min: 1574     avg: 1754     median: 1727 (4%)     max: 2034 Points
1664 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2330     avg: 2608     median: 2525 (5%)     max: 3054 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 642     avg: 694     median: 668 (3%)     max: 771 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
345 Points (15%)
68%
1 Z8750 +
233 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
935 Points (2%)
82%
1 Z8750 +
770 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1544     avg: 1576     median: 1571.5 (16%)     max: 1616 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4468     avg: 4604     median: 4608.5 (5%)     max: 4729 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1526     avg: 1563     median: 1560.5 (21%)     max: 1609 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4162     avg: 4385     median: 4376.5 (11%)     max: 4558 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
3300 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
970 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
3350 Points (5%)
4867 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8700 +
990 Points (15%)
1498 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z8700 +
2675 Points (22%)
3199 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z8700 +
2440 Points (22%)
2447 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z8700 +
3867 Points (8%)
4201 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z8700 +
3767 Points (8%)
4784 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z8700 +
3427 Points (9%)
3954 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4370 ms (5%)
min: 2966     avg: 3044     median: 3027 (4%)     max: 3142 ms
4386 ms (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 Z8700 +
348.7 ms (4%)
232 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 Z8700 +
8408 Points (8%)
min: 8632     avg: 11881     median: 12856 (12%)     max: 13290 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 Z8750 +
48.1 Points (10%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 Z8750 +
3482 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 Z8750 +
19372 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 Z8750 +
21698 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 Z8750 +
43532 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 Z8750 +
88084 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5998 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 Z8750 +
9.8 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 Z8750 +
6.8 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 Z8750 +
13.6 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x7-Z8700 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium N4200 → 183% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x7-Z8750 → 164% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 18. 17:42:07

#0 checking url part for id 6670 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8180 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9070 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.051s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6670 +0.003s ... 0.054s

#8 got single benchmarks 6670 +0.01s ... 0.064s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8180 +0.002s ... 0.067s

#10 got single benchmarks 8180 +0.058s ... 0.125s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9070 +0.003s ... 0.128s

#12 got single benchmarks 9070 +0.009s ... 0.136s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.136s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.338s ... 0.475s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.475s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)