Intel Atom x5-Z8300 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8500

Intel Atom x5-Z8300

► remove Intel Z8300

The Intel Atom x5-Z8300 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in March 2015. It is clocked at 1.44 - 1.84 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to the Atom x5-Z8500, the Atom x5-Z8300 is clocked slightly lower and therefore about 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats many ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801

Using Windows, the chip is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light browsing or Office, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 500 MHz, the GPU is significantly faster as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and can handle at least some older and less demandig Windows games in very low settings. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance sligthly below a Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom x5-Z8500

► remove Intel Z8500

The Intel Atom x5-Z8500 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android devices (tablets and convertibles), which has been presented in March 2015. It is clocked at 1.44 - 2.24 GHz and part of the Cherry Trail platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved over its predecessor Bay Trail-T (e.g. Atom Z3795). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a LPDDR3 Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Compared to the Atom x7-Z8700, the Atom x5-Z8500 is clocked slightly lower and therefore 5 - 10 percent slower. However, the x5 still beats most ARM-based SoCs and offers a performance similar to a Qualcomm Snapdragon 810

Using Windows, the chip is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet or Office, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is about twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail) and will handle older and less demandig Windows games (e.g. Counter-Strike: GO) in very low settings at decent frame rates. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Compared to ARM SoCs, the HD Graphics offers a performance similar to the Qualcomm Adreno 330 or PowerVR G6430.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom x5-Z8300Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Intel Atom x5Intel Atom x5
Cherry TrailCherry Trail
: Atom x5 Cherry Trail
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 compare1.44 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom x5-Z85001.44 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 compare1.44 - 1.92 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom x5-Z83001.44 - 1.84 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom x5-E8000 compare1.04 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom x5-Z8550 compare1.44 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom x5-Z85001.44 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 compare1.44 - 1.92 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom x5-Z83001.44 - 1.84 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom x5-E8000 compare1.04 - 2 GHz4 / 4
1440 - 1840 MHz1440 - 2240 MHz
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
14 14
90 °C90 °C
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 500 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS-1600 (12,8 GB/s), USB 3.0, 1x PCIe 2.0Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail, 200 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 3x USB 3.0, 2x PCIe 2.0
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Intel Atom x5 Z8300Intel Atom x5 Z8500

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 85     avg: 93.5     median: 94 (2%)     max: 99 Points
min: 73     avg: 103     median: 106.5 (2%)     max: 127 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 26     avg: 27.8     median: 27 (10%)     max: 31 Points
min: 35     avg: 35.8     median: 35.5 (13%)     max: 37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.2 Points (2%)
min: 1.18     avg: 1.4     median: 1.3 (3%)     max: 1.63 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (11%)
min: 0.43     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (14%)     max: 0.44 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 855     avg: 920     median: 942 (8%)     max: 951
min: 1164     avg: 1166     median: 1166 (10%)     max: 1168
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2135     avg: 2831     median: 2934 (5%)     max: 2975
min: 2947     avg: 3539     median: 3563 (6%)     max: 4107
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 Z8500 +
5560 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 Z8500 +
1656 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z8300 +
1150 s (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z8300 +
36.4 s (7%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 Z8500 +
2776 s (11%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 Z8500 +
86.7 s (46%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
780 (5%)
min: 768     avg: 842     median: 872 (6%)     max: 885
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 6.9     avg: 7     median: 7 (3%)     max: 7.05 fps
min: 6.4025     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (3%)     max: 8.03 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 35     avg: 35.7     median: 35.7 (11%)     max: 36.4 fps
min: 33.102     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (11%)     max: 40.03 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 Z8300 +
0.4 fps (1%)
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.086     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0869 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.578     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.618 GB/s
0.6 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1372     avg: 1594     median: 1691 (9%)     max: 1718 Points
min: 1693     avg: 1947     median: 1991 (11%)     max: 2158 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 45.3     avg: 47.1     median: 47.1 (10%)     max: 48.92 s
min: 38.676     avg: 38.8     median: 38.8 (8%)     max: 39 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 99.4     avg: 102     median: 102 (4%)     max: 104.517 s
min: 85.247     avg: 85.6     median: 85.6 (4%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2129     avg: 2191     median: 2190.8 (10%)     max: 2252.64 s
min: 1839.66     avg: 1856     median: 1856.3 (8%)     max: 1873 s
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 941     avg: 1135     median: 1123.5 (5%)     max: 1392 Points
min: 869     avg: 1258     median: 1353 (6%)     max: 1456 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 9720     avg: 11108     median: 11107.5 (7%)     max: 12495 Points
min: 8135     avg: 11061     median: 10445 (7%)     max: 14602 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12054     avg: 13586     median: 13575.5 (14%)     max: 15139 Points
min: 16673     avg: 18408     median: 18407.5 (19%)     max: 20142 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 900     avg: 1161     median: 988 (2%)     max: 1766 Points
min: 909     avg: 1087     median: 1136 (3%)     max: 1217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1276     avg: 1355     median: 1355 (3%)     max: 1434 Points
1727 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8300 +
min: 1086     avg: 1154     median: 1154 (14%)     max: 1222 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z8300 +
1210 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z8300 +
min: 2187     avg: 2256     median: 2256 (18%)     max: 2325 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z8300 +
min: 1915     avg: 1951     median: 1951 (18%)     max: 1987 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z8300 +
min: 2618     avg: 2626     median: 2625.5 (5%)     max: 2633 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z8300 +
min: 2610     avg: 2647     median: 2646.5 (5%)     max: 2683 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z8300 +
min: 2431     avg: 2461     median: 2460.5 (6%)     max: 2490 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2157     avg: 2198     median: 2186.5 (4%)     max: 2261
min: 1848     avg: 2455     median: 2454.5 (4%)     max: 3061
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 743     avg: 753     median: 750 (15%)     max: 767
min: 817     avg: 859     median: 858.5 (18%)     max: 900
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2352 (4%)
min: 1975     avg: 2778     median: 3170 (5%)     max: 3190
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
809 (16%)
min: 856     avg: 949     median: 990 (20%)     max: 1001
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z8300 +
min: 805     avg: 877     median: 886.5 (14%)     max: 930
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z8300 +
min: 856     avg: 1854     median: 2129.5 (5%)     max: 2300
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 5088.7     avg: 5550     median: 5707.1 (10%)     max: 5894.7 ms
min: 4420.4     avg: 4728     median: 4706.2 (8%)     max: 5142.2 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 491.8     avg: 506     median: 505.1 (6%)     max: 522 ms
min: 374.1     avg: 387     median: 387 (4%)     max: 399.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 6177     avg: 6374     median: 6373.5 (10%)     max: 6531 Points
min: 7843     avg: 8027     median: 8033 (13%)     max: 8197 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 57914     avg: 61778     median: 61777.5 (21%)     max: 65641 Points
min: 70385     avg: 71734     median: 71734 (24%)     max: 73083 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4885     avg: 5059     median: 5059 (25%)     max: 5233 Points
min: 5152     avg: 5216     median: 5215.5 (26%)     max: 5279 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x5-Z8300 → 100% n=30

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom x5-Z8500 → 114% n=30

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)