, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Atom Z560 vs Intel Atom 230 vs Intel Atom Z530

Intel Atom Z560

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z560 is a relatively high clocked Atom processor of the power efficient Z-series. It is specified at a much lower TDP than the similar N-series and offers hardware virtualization (VT-x). Due to the in-order execution, the performance per clock-rate is not as good as Celeron or Core 2 Duo processors. The missing Intel 64 Instructions wont allow a user to install a 64 Bit operating system on the Z550.

Intel Atom 230

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom 230 is a small and cheap CPU for small desktops (Nettops). It is similar to the Atom N270, but lacks Speedstep and features a higher TDP.

Due to the "in-order" Architecture of the Atom series, the 230 is slower than similar clocked Core 2 Duo processors and only suited for low demanding tasks. The Atom 230 support Hyperthreading.

Intel Atom Z530

► remove from comparison Intel Z530

The Intel Atom Z530 is a power saving netbook / MID single-core processor. Compared to the Atom N270, the Z530 supports Virtualization in hardware and got the Idle States and Demand Based Switching functions.

The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the Z530 is only compareable to a 1.2 GHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

Intel Atom Z560Intel Atom 230Intel Atom Z530
Intel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
SilverthorneSilverthorneSilverthorne
Series: Atom Silverthorne
» Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1
2130 MHz1600 MHz1600 MHz
533533533
512 KB512 KB512 KB
1 / 21 / 21 / 2
2.5 4 2
47 47 47
45 0.75-1.1V45 0.9-1.162V45 0.75-1.1V
26 mm226 mm226 mm2
90 °C85.2 °C90 °C
PBGA441PBGA437PBGA441
MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT, HyperthreadingMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T, HHTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Hyperthreading, Virtualization Technology (VT-x), Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Demand Based Switching, Ex Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Intel Atom Z560Intel Atom 230Intel Atom Z530

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 230 +
557 (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 230 +
851 (1%)
96%
1 Z530 +
min: 805     avg: 817     median: 817.5 (1%)     max: 827
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z530 +
min: 3887.19     avg: 3995     median: 3928.1 (46%)     max: 4170 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z530 +
min: 121.796     avg: 126     median: 123 (25%)     max: 133 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 230 +
5606 s (22%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 230 +
173 s (91%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z530 +
min: 440     avg: 459     median: 458.5 (1%)     max: 477 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 230 +
93 s (20%)
99%
1 Z530 +
min: 93     avg: 99.3     median: 98 (21%)     max: 108 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z530 +
min: 209     avg: 218     median: 218 (9%)     max: 226 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 230 +
3616 s (16%)
94%
1 Z530 +
min: 4671     avg: 4751     median: 4777 (21%)     max: 4804 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z530 +
min: 3953     avg: 3994     median: 3994 (2%)     max: 4035 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z530 +
min: 3302     avg: 3334     median: 3334 (3%)     max: 3366 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 230 +
1718 Points (11%)
59%
1 Z530 +
min: 820     avg: 1019     median: 1018.5 (6%)     max: 1217 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 Z530 +
2.2 Points (28%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom 230 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z530 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 29. 19:22:01

#0 checking url part for id 892 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 463 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 388 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:10:06 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 892 +0s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 892 +0s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 463 +0s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 463 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 388 +0s ... 0.016s

#12 got single benchmarks 388 +0.015s ... 0.031s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.038s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.038s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)