Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z540 vs Intel Atom Z520 vs Intel Atom Z530

Intel Atom Z540

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z540 is a power saving netbook / MID single-core processor. Compared to the Atom N270, the Z540 supports Virtualization in hardware and got the Idle States and Demand Based Switching power saving functions. Futhermore, the Z540 is higher clocked but in contrary specified at a lower TDP rating.

The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the Z540 is only compareable to a 1.3 GHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

Intel Atom Z520

► remove from comparison

The Intel Atom Z520 is a power saving netbook / MID single-core processor. Compared to the Atom N-series, the Z-series supports Virtualization in hardware and got the Idle States and Demand Based Switching functions.

The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the Z520 is only compareable to a 800-900 MHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

Intel Atom Z530

► remove from comparison Intel Z530

The Intel Atom Z530 is a power saving netbook / MID single-core processor. Compared to the Atom N270, the Z530 supports Virtualization in hardware and got the Idle States and Demand Based Switching functions.

The Atom core was designed for a low power consumption and cheap production. The downside is the relative low performance per Watt (due to the in-order execution) compared to similar clocked Celeron processors, e.g.. Still the integrated Hyper-Threading (the operating system sees the CPU as a dual core CPU) decreases the penalty of the in-order execution a bit.

The performance of the Z530 is only compareable to a 1.2 GHz clocked Celeron M and therfore only sufficient for non demanding applications like Office or web surfing. HD videos, advanced photo editing, video cutting may not run fluently. 

show full text
ModelIntel Atom Z540Intel Atom Z520Intel Atom Z530
SeriesIntel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameSilverthorneSilverthorneSilverthorne
Series: Atom Silverthorne
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z540 « 1.83 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5301.6 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z520 « 1.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Atom Z5602.13 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5502 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5401.83 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z530 « 1.6 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z5101.1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Atom Z5000.8 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1830 MHz1333 MHz1600 MHz
FSB533533533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 21 / 21 / 2
TDP2 Watt2 Watt2 Watt
Transistors47 Million47 Million47 Million
45 nm, 0.75-1.1V45 nm, 0.75-1.1V45 nm, 0.75-1.1V
Die Size26 mm226 mm226 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C90 °C
SocketPBGA441PBGA441PBGA441
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT, VT-x, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Demand Based Switching, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Hyperthreading, Virtualization Technology (VT-x), Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Demand Based Switching, Ex Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
Z540 +
min: 563     avg: 568     median: 568 (3%)     max: 573 Points
min: 424     avg: 443     median: 449 (3%)     max: 454 Points
min: 531     avg: 537     median: 537 (3%)     max: 541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
Z540 +
min: 622     avg: 778     median: 778 (1%)     max: 934 Points
min: 635     avg: 706     median: 689.5 (0%)     max: 869 Points
105%
Z530 +
min: 805     avg: 817     median: 817.5 (1%)     max: 827 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
Z540 +
3359 s (40%)
min: 4528     avg: 4595     median: 4594.5 (54%)     max: 4661 s
min: 3887     avg: 3995     median: 3928 (46%)     max: 4170 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
Z540 +
min: 105     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (21%)     max: 105.8 s
min: 141     avg: 145.8     median: 146.3 (29%)     max: 150.2 s
min: 121.8     avg: 125.9     median: 123 (25%)     max: 133 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
Z540 +
369 Points (1%)
106%
Z520 +
391 Points (1%)
124%
Z530 +
min: 440     avg: 458.5     median: 458.5 (1%)     max: 477 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
Z540 +
min: 85.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.7 (18%)     max: 86 s
min: 113     avg: 121.7     median: 115 (25%)     max: 137 s
min: 93     avg: 99.3     median: 98 (21%)     max: 108 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
Z540 +
min: 185     avg: 186.6     median: 186.6 (8%)     max: 188.1 s
min: 251     avg: 258     median: 258 (11%)     max: 265 s
min: 209     avg: 217.7     median: 218 (9%)     max: 226 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
Z540 +
4192 s (19%)
min: 5602     avg: 6153     median: 6153 (27%)     max: 6704 s
min: 4671     avg: 4751     median: 4777 (21%)     max: 4804 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
Z540 +
min: 4600     avg: 4650     median: 4650 (2%)     max: 4700 MIPS
min: 3125     avg: 3279     median: 3353 (2%)     max: 3360 MIPS
min: 3953     avg: 3994     median: 3994 (2%)     max: 4035 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
Z540 +
min: 3936     avg: 3968     median: 3968 (3%)     max: 4000 MFLOPS
min: 2608     avg: 2738     median: 2797 (2%)     max: 2808 MFLOPS
min: 3302     avg: 3334     median: 3334 (3%)     max: 3366 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
Z540 +
1547 Points (3%)
min: 692     avg: 949     median: 1002 (2%)     max: 1099 Points
min: 820     avg: 1019     median: 1018.5 (2%)     max: 1217 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 Z520 +
2.7 Points (39%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
Z540 +
min: 1.9     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (29%)     max: 2.7 Points
2.1 Points (27%)
2.2 Points (28%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z540 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z520 → 85% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z530 → 94% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 00:32:30

#0 checking url part for id 458 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 462 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 388 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 458 +0.003s ... 0.024s

#8 got single benchmarks 458 +0.014s ... 0.038s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 462 +0.003s ... 0.041s

#10 got single benchmarks 462 +0.024s ... 0.064s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 388 +0.003s ... 0.067s

#12 got single benchmarks 388 +0.026s ... 0.093s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.099s ... 0.191s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.193s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.193s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)