, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Atom Z3770 vs Intel Atom Z3775D

Intel Atom Z3770

► remove from comparison Intel Z3770

The Intel Atom Z3770 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.46 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.46 - 2.4 GHz, the Z3770 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. In our benchmarks, the Z3770 even slightly beats the Kabini APU AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 667 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3775D

► remove from comparison Intel Z3775D

The Intel Atom Z3775D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.49 - 2.41 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3775, the Z3775D only offers a single-channel memory controller and a lower display resolution.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of up to 2.41 GHz, the Z3775D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. The Z3775D even outperforms some of the Kabini APUs like the AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 792 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and is comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 as found in the Snapdragon 600. Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 1920 x 1200 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3770Intel Atom Z3775D
Intel AtomIntel Atom
Bay Trail-TBay Trail-T
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
1460 - 2400 MHz1490 - 2410 MHz
224 KB224 KB
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
<4 <4
22 22
UTFCBGA1380UTFCBGA1380
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 667 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 792 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 667 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 792 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$37 U.S.$35 U.S.
Intel Atom Z3770Intel Atom Z3775D

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 997     avg: 1158     median: 1189 (11%)     max: 1230
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 2848     avg: 3691     median: 3961 (6%)     max: 4035
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 836.7     avg: 922     median: 862.3 (10%)     max: 1126 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 24     avg: 25.9     median: 26.6 (5%)     max: 26.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 Z3770 +
898 (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 6.2     avg: 7.8     median: 7.7 (3%)     max: 9.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 31.5     avg: 39.3     median: 40.5 (12%)     max: 45.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 0.077     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.123 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 0.12     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.193 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 0.44     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (3%)     max: 0.886 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 2203     avg: 2212     median: 2212 (12%)     max: 2221 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 27     avg: 33.3     median: 36 (8%)     max: 37 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 61     avg: 74     median: 80 (3%)     max: 81 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 1566     avg: 1686     median: 1735 (8%)     max: 1756 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 15.66     avg: 7984     median: 7984.3 (4%)     max: 15953 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 7.38     avg: 3731     median: 3730.7 (3%)     max: 7454 MFLOPS
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 3379     avg: 4057     median: 4056.5 (5%)     max: 4734 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 1199     avg: 1353     median: 1330 (5%)     max: 1512 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 11561     avg: 16054     median: 17754 (11%)     max: 18706 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 17931     avg: 18729     median: 18754 (20%)     max: 19503 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 956     avg: 1316     median: 1471 (4%)     max: 1555 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 1348     avg: 1748     median: 1748 (4%)     max: 2148 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 2472     avg: 2523     median: 2522.5 (20%)     max: 2573 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 2278     avg: 2358     median: 2357.5 (21%)     max: 2437 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 3092     avg: 3110     median: 3110 (6%)     max: 3128 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 3617     avg: 3637     median: 3637 (7%)     max: 3657 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 3063     avg: 3085     median: 3084.5 (8%)     max: 3106 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 2998     avg: 3035     median: 3035 (5%)     max: 3072
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z3770 +
min: 977     avg: 981     median: 980.5 (20%)     max: 984
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 Z3770 +
717 MFLOPS (24%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 Z3770 +
265 MFLOPS (26%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3770 +
567 ms (6%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3770 +
577 ms (5%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 Z3770 +
22792 points (53%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 Z3770 +
36357 Points (85%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 Z3770 +
428 Iter./s (13%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 Z3770 +
21235 Iter./s (70%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3770 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 25. 11:33:41

#0 checking url part for id 4470 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5939 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.013s ... 0.013s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4470 +0s ... 0.014s

#7 got single benchmarks 4470 +0.01s ... 0.024s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5939 +0s ... 0.024s

#9 got single benchmarks 5939 +0s ... 0.025s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.037s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)