Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z3740D vs Intel Atom Z3745D vs Intel Atom Z3775

Intel Atom Z3740D

► remove from comparison Intel Z3740D

The Intel Atom Z3740D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3740, the Z3740D only offers a single-channel memory controller and a lower display resolution.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3740D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. According to our benchmarks, the Z3740D even competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 688 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games like World of Warcraft or Fifa will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 1920 x 1200 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3745D

► remove from comparison Intel Z3745D

The Intel Atom Z3745D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3745, the Z3745D only offers a single-channel memory controller and a lower display resolution.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3745D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3745D competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 792 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games like World of Warcraft or Fifa will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 1920 x 1200 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3775

► remove from comparison Intel Z3775

The Intel Atom Z3775 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.46 - 2.39 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Compared to the Z3770, the Z3775 is based on the new C0 stepping and offers a slightly increased GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.46 - 2.39 GHz, the Z3775 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. The Z3775 even beats some of the Kabini APUs like the AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 778 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Atom Z3740DIntel Atom Z3745DIntel Atom Z3775
SeriesIntel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameBay Trail-TBay Trail-TBay Trail-T
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1330 - 1830 MHz1330 - 1830 MHz1460 - 2390 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB224 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP<4 Watt<4 Watt<4 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
SocketUTFCBGA1380UTFCBGA1380
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 688 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 792 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 778 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 688 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 792 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 778 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$32 U.S.$32 U.S.$35 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Atom Z3740DIntel Atom Z3745DIntel Atom Z3775

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3775 +
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3775 +
0.4 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 685     avg: 895     median: 963 (9%)     max: 968 Points
972 Points (9%)
min: 1108     avg: 1139     median: 1144 (10%)     max: 1165 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2442     avg: 3047     median: 3222.5 (4%)     max: 3301 Points
3389 Points (5%)
min: 3997     avg: 4025     median: 4014 (5%)     max: 4065 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z3740D +
1002 s (12%)
103%
1 Z3775 +
min: 762     avg: 800     median: 800 (9%)     max: 838 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z3740D +
31.9 s (6%)
101%
1 Z3775 +
min: 24.2     avg: 25.5     median: 25.5 (5%)     max: 26.74 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 Z3740D +
min: 1378     avg: 1557     median: 1556.5 (9%)     max: 1735 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
7.8 fps (4%)
7.3 fps (3%)
9.5 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
31.9 fps (9%)
38.1 fps (10%)
47 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 Z3740D +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
126%
1 Z3775 +
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 Z3740D +
0.2 GB/s (3%)
125%
1 Z3775 +
0.2 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 Z3740D +
0.7 GB/s (3%)
127%
1 Z3775 +
0.9 GB/s (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z3740D +
1827 Points (4%)
120%
1 Z3775 +
2195 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 45.14     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (10%)     max: 46.08 s
11 s (2%)
min: 36     avg: 36.3     median: 36.3 (8%)     max: 36.52 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 98.3     avg: 99.4     median: 99.4 (4%)     max: 100.5 s
25 s (1%)
min: 80     avg: 80.1     median: 80.1 (3%)     max: 80.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2106     avg: 2122     median: 2122 (9%)     max: 2138 s
623 s (3%)
min: 1719     avg: 1723     median: 1723 (8%)     max: 1727 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z3740D +
19790 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z3740D +
9280 MFLOPS (7%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 Z3775 +
4793 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 Z3740D +
min: 1049     avg: 1233     median: 1266.5 (4%)     max: 1350 Points
106%
1 Z3745D +
1345 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z3740D +
14993 Points (10%)
115%
1 Z3775 +
17178 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 Z3745D +
16261 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z3740D +
12461 Points (10%)
58%
1 Z3745D +
7226 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 Z3740D +
1269 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z3775 +
2925 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z3775 +
907 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z3740D +
2282 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z3740D +
2068 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z3740D +
2602 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z3740D +
2939 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z3740D +
2581 Points (7%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3775 +
7111 ms (8%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 423.6     avg: 671     median: 586 (6%)     max: 1002 ms
629 ms (7%)
350.6 ms (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3740D → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3745D → 105% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3775 → 115% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 09. 04:06:42

#0 checking url part for id 4473 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5935 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5937 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.009s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.014s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.019s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.019s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 4473 +0s ... 0.019s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#48 got single benchmarks 4473 +0.008s ... 0.028s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 5935 +0s ... 0.028s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#51 got single benchmarks 5935 +0.005s ... 0.034s

#52 getting avg benchmarks for device 5937 +0s ... 0.034s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#54 got single benchmarks 5937 +0.009s ... 0.043s

#55 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.045s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.061s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#132 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.065s

#133 return log +0s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)