Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z3736F vs Intel Atom Z3795

Intel Atom Z3736F

► remove from comparison Intel Z3736F

The Intel Atom Z3736F is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (Android or Windows). It is clocked at 1.33 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3735F, the Z3736F offers a somewhat higher CPU burst.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3736F is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3736F competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex Windows software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3736F is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and can also be found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3795

► remove from comparison Intel Z3795

The Intel Atom Z3795 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.59 - 2.39 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. Compared to the Z3775, the Z3795 offers a slightly higher CPU base clock.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.59 - 2.39 GHz, the Z3795 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. The Z3795 even beats some of the Kabini APUs like the AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 778 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Atom Z3736FIntel Atom Z3795
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameBay Trail-TBay Trail-T
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1330 - 2160 MHz1590 - 2390 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP<4 Watt<4 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
SocketUTFCBGA592UTFCBGA1380
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 778 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 778 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$20 U.S.$40 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Atom Z3736FIntel Atom Z3795

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 118     avg: 127.7     median: 131 (1%)     max: 134 Points
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 36     avg: 37     median: 37 (13%)     max: 38 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 1.61     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (3%)     max: 1.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 Z3795 +
0.4 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 713     avg: 930     median: 962 (9%)     max: 1115 Points
min: 1220     avg: 1394     median: 1234 (11%)     max: 1727 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2309     avg: 2700     median: 2867 (4%)     max: 2924 Points
min: 3324     avg: 3715     median: 3715 (5%)     max: 4106 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 1727     avg: 4390     median: 5683 (5%)     max: 5761 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 1727     avg: 2951     median: 1732 (11%)     max: 5393 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1190     avg: 1192     median: 1191.5 (14%)     max: 1193 s
1020 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 37.86     avg: 38     median: 38 (8%)     max: 38.17 s
min: 25.93     avg: 27.2     median: 27.2 (5%)     max: 28.4 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1624 Points (9%)
1075 Points (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
6.8 fps (3%)
min: 7.12     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (4%)     max: 9.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
35.6 fps (10%)
min: 37.15     avg: 42.1     median: 42.1 (11%)     max: 47.13 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.124     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.125 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (3%)
min: 0.193     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (4%)     max: 0.195 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.6 GB/s (2%)
min: 0.885     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (3%)     max: 0.891 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z3795 +
min: 2069     avg: 2146     median: 2145.5 (5%)     max: 2222 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 47.15     avg: 47.6     median: 47.6 (10%)     max: 48 s
min: 36.26     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (8%)     max: 37 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 103.8     avg: 103.9     median: 103.9 (4%)     max: 104 s
min: 79.6     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (3%)     max: 81 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2088     avg: 2142     median: 2142 (10%)     max: 2196 s
min: 1732     avg: 1735     median: 1734.5 (8%)     max: 1737 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z3795 +
24.2 MIPS (0%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z3795 +
12.2 MFLOPS (0%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 Z3795 +
3552 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 950     avg: 1085     median: 1144 (4%)     max: 1161 Points
min: 1141     avg: 1386     median: 1301 (5%)     max: 1799 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 11513     avg: 12264     median: 12263.5 (8%)     max: 13014 Points
18838 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 Z3795 +
20794 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 Z3736F +
min: 886     avg: 967     median: 967 (2%)     max: 1048 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z3736F +
2148 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z3736F +
1881 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z3736F +
2033 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z3736F +
2446 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z3736F +
2158 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z3736F +
min: 1941     avg: 2051     median: 2051 (4%)     max: 2161 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z3736F +
min: 729     avg: 787     median: 787 (16%)     max: 845 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 5502     avg: 7119     median: 5863 (7%)     max: 9992 ms
8367 ms (10%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 504     avg: 529     median: 508 (6%)     max: 576 ms
388.3 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2958     avg: 5322     median: 6002 (6%)     max: 7007 Points
3353 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3736F → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3795 → 115% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 29. 02:19:38

#0 checking url part for id 6210 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5968 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.015s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#25 composed specs +0s ... 0.015s

#26 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 6210 +0s ... 0.016s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#30 got single benchmarks 6210 +0.009s ... 0.025s

#31 getting avg benchmarks for device 5968 +0s ... 0.025s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#33 got single benchmarks 5968 +0.01s ... 0.035s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.041s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.043s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#130 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.06s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#132 return log +0.004s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)