Intel Atom Z3736F vs Intel Atom Z3745D vs Intel Atom Z3770D

Intel Atom Z3736F

► remove Intel Z3736F

The Intel Atom Z3736F is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (Android or Windows). It is clocked at 1.33 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3735F, the Z3736F offers a somewhat higher CPU burst.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3736F is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3736F competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex Windows software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3736F is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and can also be found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3745D

► remove Intel Z3745D

The Intel Atom Z3745D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3745, the Z3745D only offers a single-channel memory controller and a lower display resolution.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3745D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3745D competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 792 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games like World of Warcraft or Fifa will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 1920 x 1200 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3770D

► remove Intel Z3770D

The Intel Atom Z3770D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.5 - 2.4 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3770, the Z3770D only offers a single-channel memory controller and a lower display resolution.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of up to 2.4 GHz, the Z3770D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. The Z3770 even outperforms some of the Kabini APUs like the AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 688 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and is comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 as found in the Snapdragon 600. Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 1920 x 1200 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 - 2.4 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3736FIntel Atom Z3745DIntel Atom Z3770D
Intel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
Bay Trail-TBay Trail-TBay Trail-T
: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z37951590 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751460 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701460 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1500 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3736F1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z37951590 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751460 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701460 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3770D1500 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3745D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z37951590 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37851490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37751460 - 2390 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3775D1490 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37701460 - 2400 MHz4 / 4
» Intel Atom Z3770D1500 - 2410 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736F1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3736G1330 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37451330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3745D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z37401330 - 1860 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3740D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735D1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735E1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735F1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z3735G1330 - 1830 MHz4 / 4
Intel Atom Z36801330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Atom Z3680D1330 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
1330 - 2160 MHz1330 - 1830 MHz1500 - 2410 MHz
224 KB224 KB224 KB
2 MB2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 44 / 4
<4 <4 <4
22 22 22
UTFCBGA592UTFCBGA1380
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 792 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 688 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 792 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 688 MHz)
$20 U.S.$32 U.S.$37 U.S.
Intel Atom Z3736FIntel Atom Z3745DIntel Atom Z3770D

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 713     avg: 930     median: 962 (10%)     max: 1115 Points
972 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 2309     avg: 2700     median: 2867 (4%)     max: 2924 Points
3389 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 1190     avg: 1191.6     median: 1191 (14%)     max: 1192 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 37     avg: 38     median: 38 (8%)     max: 38 seconds
WinRAR - Result
1624 KB/s (19%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
6.8 fps (4%)
7.3 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
35.6 fps (13%)
38.1 fps (14%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (4%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.6 GB/s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 47     avg: 47.6     median: 47 (10%)     max: 48 Seconds
11 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 103     avg: 103.9     median: 103 (4%)     max: 104 Seconds
25 Seconds (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2088     avg: 2141.8     median: 2141 (10%)     max: 2195 Seconds
623 Seconds (3%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 950     avg: 1085     median: 1144 (6%)     max: 1161 points
1345 points (7%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 11513     avg: 12263.5     median: 12263 (8%)     max: 13014 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
16261 Points (19%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
7226 Points (8%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 886     avg: 967     median: 967 (2%)     max: 1048 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
2148 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
1881 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
2033 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
2446 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
2158 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1941     avg: 2051     median: 2051 (3%)     max: 2161 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 729     avg: 787     median: 787 (16%)     max: 845 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 5502     avg: 7119.1     median: 5862 (10%)     max: 9992 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 503     avg: 529.2     median: 508 (6%)     max: 575 ms
629 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 2958     avg: 5322.3     median: 6002 (11%)     max: 7007 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3736F → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3745D → 107%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)