Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z3735D vs Intel Atom Z3736G

Intel Atom Z3735D

► remove from comparison Intel Z3735D

The Intel Atom Z3735D is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (mainly Android). It is clocked at 1.33 - 1.83 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3745D, the Z3735D offers a somewhat lower GPU clock rate.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3735D is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3735D competes with AMDs Temash and Kabini APUs like the A6-1450 and A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3735D is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3736G

► remove from comparison Intel Z3736G

The Intel Atom Z3736G is a power-efficient quad-core SoC for tablets (Android or Windows). It is clocked at 1.33 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3736F, the Z3736G only offers a 32 bit single-channel DDR3L-RS-1333 memory controller (max. 1 GB, 5.3 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and the improved performance per clock, the Z3736G is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Depending on the benchmark, the Z3736G competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex Windows software or modern games. Compared to ARM SoCs for Android systems, the Z3736G is placed in the upper mid-range segment.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 646 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games (like simple Android titles) will run fluently. However, video acceleration and other multimedia applications are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2.2 W, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Atom Z3735DIntel Atom Z3736G
CodenameBay Trail-TBay Trail-T
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D « 1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3795 compare1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3785 compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775 compare1.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D compare1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770 compare1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D compare1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F compare1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G « 1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740 compare1.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G compare1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3680 compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D compare1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1330 - 1830 MHz1330 - 2160 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP4 Watt4 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
SocketUTFCBGA1380UTFCBGA592
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick SyncIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 646 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 1 GB Single-Channel (32 Bit) DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 646 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 646 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$20 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 744     avg: 851     median: 851 (5%)     max: 958 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 2514     avg: 2726     median: 2726 (2%)     max: 2938 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z3735D +
1165 s (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z3735D +
37.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 Z3735D +
1669 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 Z3735D +
6.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 Z3735D +
35.1 fps (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 Z3735D +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 Z3735D +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 Z3735D +
0.6 GB/s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 Z3735D +
92 s (20%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z3735D +
176.3 s (8%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 Z3735D +
3458 s (15%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 1199     avg: 1202     median: 1202 (3%)     max: 1205 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 13200     avg: 13403     median: 13403 (11%)     max: 13606 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 1041     avg: 1055     median: 1055 (3%)     max: 1069 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 2138     avg: 2168     median: 2167.5 (4%)     max: 2197 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 782     avg: 783     median: 782.5 (15%)     max: 783 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 Z3735D +
2303 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 Z3735D +
2014 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 Z3735D +
2247 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 Z3735D +
2620 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 Z3735D +
2336 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 8844     avg: 9011     median: 9010.5 (11%)     max: 9177 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 489.3     avg: 490.4     median: 490.4 (5%)     max: 491.4 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 Z3735D +
min: 3479     avg: 3509     median: 3509 (3%)     max: 3539 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z3735D → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 04. 16:54:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5964 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6212 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733327671s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 04 Dec 2024 05:18:37 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5964 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 5964 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6212 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 6212 +0s ... 0.012s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.022s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.025s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)