Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs Qualcomm Adreno 643

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 680

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.

Qualcomm Adreno 643

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 643

The Qualcomm Adreno 643 is an integrated graphics unit (iGPU) that is used in the Qualcomm QCM6490 and QCS6490. The SoC is not only intended for use in Android-based smartphones and tablets, but also for IoT products with Linux, Ubuntu or Windows 11 IoT Enterprise. In the QCM6490 and QCS6490 the 643 clocks at 812 MHz.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 680Qualcomm Adreno 643
Adreno 600 Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz812 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
technology4 nm7 nm6 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 06.12.2018 12.08.2021
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIDirectX 12DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Vulkan 1.x
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 680GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G8 x 3150 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx8 x 2840 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 643GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm QCM64908 x 1960 MHz812 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
6499 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
7131 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
3135 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
887 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1650     avg: 1847     median: 1847 (2%)     max: 2044 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1593     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (1%)     max: 2278 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
353 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
8.2 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
18 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
49 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
40 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
69 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
90 fps (4%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
140.2 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 643
159 fps (1%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
192996 Points (19%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
182032 Points (15%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
51.8 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
2937 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
3054 Points (1%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1890 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
5.9 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 680 → 46% n=1

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 643 → 53% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
97%
Adreno 643:
58  fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
67%
Adreno 643:
40  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
65%
Adreno 643:
38  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
136%
Adreno 643:
60  fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
101%
Adreno 643:
40  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
125%
Adreno 643:
40  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 643:
60  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 643 → 99%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 99%

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 680Qualcomm Adreno 643
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact59.559.358.2584038
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile4439.532604040
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 680Qualcomm Adreno 643
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

2


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1

2


1


1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 19. 08:29:36

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11804 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752906576s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 05:20:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.028s ... 0.071s

#10 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.006s ... 0.077s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0s ... 0.078s

#12 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.005s ... 0.083s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11804 +0s ... 0.083s

#14 got single benchmarks 11804 +0.003s ... 0.086s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.089s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.09s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.09s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.09s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.103s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.103s

#22 Got 21 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.108s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.108s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.109s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.111s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.111s

#27 return log +0s ... 0.112s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)