Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 650

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 650

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 650

The Qualcomm Adreno 650 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, 865+ and 870 SoCs. The chip will be available from early 2020 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. The base clock speed of the GPU is 250 MHz and the boost depends on the used SoC. For the 865 it is 587 MHz, the 865 Plus increased to 846 MHz and the 2021 870 reached 670 MHz.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 650 GPU offers a 25% improved performance over the Adreno 640, its predecessor, which is integrated into the Snapdragon 855 SoC. The enhanced performance is achieved by the Adreno 650 having 50% more compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 640. Furthermore, the clock speed of the pixel shaders was also increased by 50%.

The performance in our first benchmarks of a reference system positions itself above the ARM Mali-G76 MP16 and e.g. in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme even on the top spot. In GFXBench only the Apple A13 GPU is able to best the Adreno 650 (regarding smartphone GPUs).

As a novelty, the GPU driver can be updated in the Android Play Store. Furthermore, some features are running under the Elite Gaming brand (e.g., 144 Hz display support, desktop forward rendering). 

The Adreno 650 supports Vulkan 1.1, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and OpenCL 2.0 FP. Furthermore, games and videos can use HDR10+ and Dolby Vision (with a supported display). The 650 supports 2 displays with up to 4K 60 Hz / QHD+ 144 Hz.

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 650
Adreno 600 Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
Adreno 660
Adreno 650 @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690
Adreno 685
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642
Adreno 642L
Adreno 640
Adreno 630
Adreno 620
Adreno 619
Adreno 619L
Adreno 618
Adreno 616
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2Adreno 600
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz250 - 670 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
technology4 nm4 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 07.05.2021 04.12.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 650GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W? MHz670 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)8 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz646 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8658 x 2420 MHz, 5 W250 MHz587 MHz
min. - max.250 MHz587 - 670 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 6303     avg: 6921     median: 6953.5 (30%)     max: 7472 Points
min: 7970     avg: 9563     median: 9684 (42%)     max: 11492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 8656     avg: 8893     median: 8751 (19%)     max: 9414 Points
min: 11617     avg: 13051     median: 12858 (28%)     max: 16809 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 5501     avg: 6187     median: 6286 (26%)     max: 6466 Points
min: 6960     avg: 8089     median: 8085 (34%)     max: 8975 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 6767     avg: 7042     median: 7023 (17%)     max: 7388 Points
min: 8593     avg: 9728     median: 9498 (24%)     max: 11999 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
min: 6114     avg: 6700     median: 6700 (60%)     max: 7285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
min: 8410     avg: 8641     median: 8487 (51%)     max: 9025 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
min: 5090     avg: 5524     median: 5565 (27%)     max: 5876 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 5779     avg: 6156     median: 6159.5 (21%)     max: 6524 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 3035     avg: 3133     median: 3137 (2%)     max: 3184 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
min: 9.7     avg: 9.9     median: 10 (4%)     max: 10 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 18     avg: 21.1     median: 21 (4%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 27     avg: 55     median: 55 (4%)     max: 67 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
min: 37     avg: 38.2     median: 38 (4%)     max: 40 fps
min: 39     avg: 52.6     median: 51 (5%)     max: 62 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 52     avg: 62.4     median: 65 (1%)     max: 67 fps
min: 67     avg: 87.2     median: 88 (2%)     max: 103 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
min: 86     avg: 89.2     median: 88 (4%)     max: 94 fps
min: 96     avg: 125.1     median: 125 (5%)     max: 151 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
min: 147     avg: 150.2     median: 148 (1%)     max: 158 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 650
min: 168     avg: 209.5     median: 206 (2%)     max: 266 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
min: 174679     avg: 177977     median: 175343 (18%)     max: 187645 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
170281 Points (14%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
min: 50.74     avg: 51.7     median: 51.7 (1%)     max: 52.63 fps
min: 72.6     avg: 75.5     median: 75 (2%)     max: 78.57 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
min: 2448     avg: 2513     median: 2497 (1%)     max: 2610 Points
2688 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
min: 2650     avg: 2776     median: 2729.5 (1%)     max: 2993 Points
2532 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
30029 Points (10%)
54110 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
42541 Points (70%)
42627 Points (71%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 4.19     avg: 4.8     median: 4.6 (2%)     max: 5.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 52% n=17

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 68% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 644:
42  fps
Adreno 650:
60  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 644:
45  fps
Adreno 650:
60  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 650:
60 119 ~ 90 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
148%
Adreno 650:
60 117 ~ 89 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
60 118 ~ 89 fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
101%
Adreno 650:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
103%
Adreno 650:
59 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
100%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
106%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 52 59 60 60 60 60 62 64 85 91 114 117 119 120 ~ 71 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
136%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
139%
Adreno 650:
40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 90 90 ~ 61 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
101%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
147%
Adreno 650:
40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
125%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
166%
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 39 40 40 40 40 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 53 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 650:
60 60 62 ~ 61 fps
ultra
Adreno 650:
60 60 61 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Adreno 650:
60 60 90 105 142 144 ~ 100 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 650:
30 30 60 60 ~ 45 fps
high
Adreno 650:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 58 60 60 60 ~ 41 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 650:
60 144 ~ 102 fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 116%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 116%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 650 → 130%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 131%

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 650
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal42456060
Armajet676771
PUBG Mobile4439.53260404061585340
Dead Trigger 260100
Subway Surfers61
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 650
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1


1


1
1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1

1


1
3

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2

1


1
2

1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 20. 13:58:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9971 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753012735s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:29:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.032s ... 0.032s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.032s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.02s ... 0.052s

#10 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.005s ... 0.058s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0s ... 0.058s

#12 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.007s ... 0.065s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9971 +0s ... 0.066s

#14 got single benchmarks 9971 +0.031s ... 0.097s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.104s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.105s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.106s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.107s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.125s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.125s

#22 Got 186 rows for game benchmarks. +0.019s ... 0.144s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.144s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.146s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.152s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.152s

#27 return log +0.001s ... 0.153s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)