Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Qualcomm Adreno 620

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Qualcomm Adreno 620

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 620

The Qualcomm Adreno 620 is a mobile graphics card for upper mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G and 765 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 620 in the 765G is 10% faster than the one in the 765 and 20% faster than the old Adreno 618. In our benchmarks, the Adreno 620 in the Snapdragon 765G even was 25% faster in selected benchmarks, but the faster CPU will also influence the results.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 620
Adreno 600 Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940 compare
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2Adreno 600
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm14 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 11_1)
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 09.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Adreno 620GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G8 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7658 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 56690     avg: 67038     median: 68764 (7%)     max: 70216 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 3678     avg: 4551     median: 4663 (20%)     max: 4893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 4036     avg: 5146     median: 5344 (12%)     max: 5437 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (36%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 2934     avg: 3394     median: 3494 (15%)     max: 3605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (31%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 2814     avg: 3435     median: 3554 (9%)     max: 3592 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
min: 2972     avg: 4323     median: 4515 (40%)     max: 4693 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
min: 2844     avg: 4859     median: 5115 (31%)     max: 5832 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
0 Points (0%)
min: 2261     avg: 3146     median: 3267 (16%)     max: 3346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
min: 2048     avg: 3116     median: 3277 (11%)     max: 3342 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 1022     avg: 1402     median: 1604 (1%)     max: 1681 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 443     avg: 443.5     median: 443.5 (1%)     max: 444 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 5.3     avg: 8.3     median: 8.5 (2%)     max: 13 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 12     avg: 21.5     median: 23 (2%)     max: 24 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (6%)     max: 72 fps
min: 12     avg: 19.7     median: 21 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 22     avg: 35     median: 37 (1%)     max: 38 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (8%)     max: 214 fps
min: 31     avg: 50.9     median: 54 (2%)     max: 56 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 620
min: 48     avg: 88.4     median: 95 (1%)     max: 97 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (32%)     max: 366379 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
402385 Points (32%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (3%)
30.4 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (2%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 11776     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (7%)     max: 31296 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 5334     avg: 16658     median: 16657.5 (28%)     max: 27981 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 30% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 620:
60  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
100%
Adreno 620:
60  fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
88%
Adreno 620:
52  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
40%
Adreno 620:
23  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
112%
Adreno 620:
60 90 ~ 75 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
86%
Adreno 620:
30 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 38 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
101%
Adreno 620:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
97%
Adreno 620:
30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 40 ~ 31 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
ultra
Adreno 620:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Adreno 620:
62 120 ~ 91 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 620:
29 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Adreno 620:
21 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 620 → 89%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 94%

Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60606060
Genshin Impact59.559.358.25223
Armajet6775
PUBG Mobile4439.532384031
Arena of Valor4545
Dead Trigger 291
Asphalt 9: Legends3029
Samsung Xclipse 920Qualcomm Adreno 620
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


2


1
2

1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

2

1
1
3
1
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 20:37:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10317 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752777461s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 17 Jul 2025 15:21:38 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.014s ... 0.045s

#9 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.006s ... 0.051s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10317 +0s ... 0.051s

#11 got single benchmarks 10317 +0.015s ... 0.067s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.071s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.073s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.082s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.082s

#19 Got 58 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.089s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.089s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.09s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.093s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.093s

#24 return log +0.001s ... 0.094s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)