, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs NXP i.MX 6SLL

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

The VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 is an entry-level SoC for smartphones and tablets. It is aimed at Android 4.x and Windows CE devices and includes a single core Cortex-A9 processor at 1 GHz, an ARM Mali 400 (MP2?) graphics card, multi-standard 1080p video decoding, H.264 video encoding, a DDR3, LPDDR2 memory controller and a hardware security engine.

NXP i.MX 6SLL

► remove from comparison i.MX 6SLL

The NXP i.MX 6SLL or i.MX6SLL (i.MX 6 Series, MCIMX6V7DVN10AB Part Number) is a single core processor for e-readers. It integrates a single ARM Cortex-A9 processor core clocked at up to 1 GHz and a 2D graphics accelerator called Pixel Processor PXP (including E-INK display controller EPDC with support of up to 2332x1650 and 5-bit greyscale). The integrated memory controller supports up to 400 MHz LPDDR2 or LPDDR3 (32-bit interface). Flash memory can be attached using eMMC 5.0 or SD 3.0 (three connections available). Furthermore, the SoC supports 2x USB 2.0 OTH with PHY. The chip is pin-compatible with the i.MX 6SoloLite which features an additional Vivante GC320 graphics card. WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS or other peripherals have to be connected with external chips.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950NXP i.MX 6SLL
Cortex-A9Cortex-A9
Series: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
» WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
» NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
1000 MHz1000 MHz
1 / 11 / 1
iGPUARM Mali-400 MPNXP PXP
ArchitectureARMARM
WM8950 i.MX 6SLL
64 KB
256 KB
40
32-Bit DRAM Controller 400 MHz LPDDR2/LPDDR3, E-INK Display Controller, 2D Graphics Acceleration, eMMC 5.0, USB 2.0 OTG

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 WM8950 +
2410 ms (23%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
6771 ms (74%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 WM8950 +
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks NXP i.MX 6SLL → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 26. 01:33:54

#0 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11524 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.046s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.046s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0s ... 0.046s

#7 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.006s ... 0.052s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11524 +0s ... 0.053s

#9 got single benchmarks 11524 +0.004s ... 0.057s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.06s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)