, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs Rockchip RK3188

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

The VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 is an entry-level SoC for smartphones and tablets. It is aimed at Android 4.x and Windows CE devices and includes a single core Cortex-A9 processor at 1 GHz, an ARM Mali 400 (MP2?) graphics card, multi-standard 1080p video decoding, H.264 video encoding, a DDR3, LPDDR2 memory controller and a hardware security engine.

Rockchip RK3188

► remove from comparison

The Rockchip RK3188 is a fast ARM SoC primarily designed for tablets. It integrates four ARM Cortex A9 cores with NEON extension and a clock speed of up to 1.8 GHz, a Mali-400 MP4 graphics card (up to 600 MHz, 24 GFLOPS) and a low-power (LP-)DDR2/DDR3 memory controller. Due to the high clock rates, the performance of the CPU and GPU is superior to other Cortex-A9 quad-cores such as the Nvidia Tegra 3 and Samsung Exynos 4412. These high frequencies are possible due to the 28nm process (TSMC). However, this results in high power consumption and is thus not suited for compact smartphones.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950Rockchip RK3188
Cortex-A9Cortex-A9
Series: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
» WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
» Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
1000 MHz1800 MHz
1 / 14 / 4
iGPUARM Mali-400 MPARM Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
WM8950 RK3188
28
Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller (max. 2 GByte)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 5828     avg: 7773     median: 7936 (5%)     max: 8887 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 5434     avg: 7724     median: 8025.5 (9%)     max: 8812 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 9142     avg: 9821     median: 9821 (10%)     max: 10500 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 182     avg: 320     median: 272 (2%)     max: 506 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 326     avg: 687     median: 803 (7%)     max: 933 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1769     avg: 2044     median: 2035 (4%)     max: 2328 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 924     avg: 1123     median: 1104 (2%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1130     avg: 1275     median: 1182 (3%)     max: 1512 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 1316     avg: 1410     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1493
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 476     avg: 499     median: 504 (10%)     max: 516
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
min: 130.044     avg: 131     median: 131.1 (4%)     max: 132.08 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
min: 54.937     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (6%)     max: 59.372 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
13698 ms (23%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
2410 ms (23%)
min: 701.9     avg: 986     median: 1086 (10%)     max: 1169.6 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 849.2     avg: 1179     median: 1239.8 (14%)     max: 1387.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 3092     avg: 3094     median: 3093.5 (4%)     max: 3095 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
2140 points (5%)
5287 points (12%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
1282 Points (8%)
min: 7505     avg: 7723     median: 7807 (51%)     max: 7856 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 2139     avg: 14154     median: 19571 (46%)     max: 20752 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 179     avg: 329     median: 374 (11%)     max: 434 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 10329     avg: 11213     median: 11588 (38%)     max: 11722 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 9258     avg: 10743     median: 10965 (1%)     max: 11782 Points

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3188 → 310% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 26. 21:36:03

#0 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4137 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.044s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.045s

#7 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.006s ... 0.051s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4137 +0.001s ... 0.051s

#9 got single benchmarks 4137 +0.014s ... 0.065s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.073s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.098s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)