WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs HiSilicon Kirin 910

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove WM8950

The VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 is an entry-level SoC for smartphones and tablets. It is aimed at Android 4.x and Windows CE devices and includes a single core Cortex-A9 processor at 1 GHz, an ARM Mali 400 (MP2?) graphics card, multi-standard 1080p video decoding, H.264 video encoding, a DDR3, LPDDR2 memory controller and a hardware security engine.

HiSilicon Kirin 910

► remove

The HiSilicon Kirin 910 is an ARM based quad core SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. As HiSilicon is fully owned by Huawei, the chip is mostly used in Huawei models like the MediaPad X1, P6 S, MediaPad M1 and Honor 3C 4G). The SoC integrates four Cortex-A9 cores (at 1.6 GHz max.), a ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU (at 533 MHz), a 32-bit single-channel LPDDR3-1600 memory controller (533 MHz) and a LTE Cat. 4 radio. The similar named HiSilicon Kirin 910T is a 200 MHz higher clocked (CPU) version.

At the time of announcement in mid 2014, the CPU performance is in the mid-range of smartphone and tablet SoCs. The power consumption is a bit higher than usual, as the CPU cores are rather high clocked.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950HiSilicon Kirin 910
Cortex-A9Cortex-A9
: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T (compare)1800 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 9101600 MHz4 / 4
Renesas MP5232 (compare)1500 MHz2 / 2
Broadcom BCM21664T (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
Marvell PXA986 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
» WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501000 MHz1 / 1
HiSilicon Kirin 910T (compare)1800 MHz4 / 4
» HiSilicon Kirin 9101600 MHz4 / 4
Renesas MP5232 (compare)1500 MHz2 / 2
Broadcom BCM21664T (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
Marvell PXA986 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501000 MHz1 / 1
1000 MHz1600 MHz
1 / 14 / 4
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
WM8950
28
ARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)

3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 9720     avg: 9784.5     median: 9784 (6%)     max: 9849 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 9766     avg: 9883.5     median: 9883 (12%)     max: 10001 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 8327     avg: 9920     median: 9920 (11%)     max: 11513 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
622 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
1753 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
2784 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
1575 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
1938 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1452     avg: 1547.5     median: 1547 (5%)     max: 1643 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 481     avg: 509     median: 509 (11%)     max: 537 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Multi Thread
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
202 MFLOPS (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Single Thread
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
62.8 MFLOPS (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
22418.8 ms (38%)
Sunspider - 0.9.1 Total Score *
2410.2 ms (23%)
1217.4 ms (12%)
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1277     avg: 1360.6     median: 1360 (15%)     max: 1444 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 1467     avg: 1535     median: 1535 (3%)     max: 1603 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Metal
874 Points (23%)
Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta
1200 Points (27%)
Vellamo 3.x - Browser
1973 Points (26%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
2140 points (5%)
5563 points (13%)
AnTuTu v3 - CPU
1282 (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - Total Score
min: 21467     avg: 21864.5     median: 21864 (51%)     max: 22262
AndEBench - Java
537 Iter./s (17%)
AndEBench - Native
11881 Iter./s (39%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - CPU Tests
11258 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
2019 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 100%

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910 → 132%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)