Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon W-10885M vs Intel Core i9-10980HK vs Intel Core i5-10500H

Intel Xeon W-10885M

► remove from comparison Intel W-10885M

The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a high-end processor for workstation laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10885M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Intel Core i9-10885H

Performance

The performance of the W-10885M should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the Intel Xeon W-10885M is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all. The P-variant uses professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i9-10980HK

► remove from comparison Intel i9-10980HK

The Intel Core i9-10980HK is a high-end processor for laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz (all 8 cores up to 4.4 GHz) and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The 5.3 GHz can be only achieved below 65°C core temperature (Thermal Velocity Boost), between 65 and 85°C, 5.2 GHz are the maximum and above that 5.1 with restrictions (Turbo Boost 3.0).

The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i9-9980HK, the 10980HK probably offers only increased base clock rates (and maybe multi core turbo clocks). Thanks to the free multiplicator, the CPU can also be easily overclocked (but may not have much headroom).

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i7-10750H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the similar (and later released) Core i9-10885H (2.4 - 5.3 GHz).

Performance

The performance of the Core i9-10980HK should be higher than the old Core i9-9980HK (2.4 - 5 GHz) thanks to the increased turbo clock speeds. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the i9-10980HK is the fastest Comet Lake-H CPU and fastest laptop CPU on the market. 

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9980HK. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Beware, the CPU was not yet released at the time of writing and the information is based on leaks and early information.

Intel Core i5-10500H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10500H

The Intel Core i5-10500H is a fast processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured on a 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced on the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

Performance

The average 10500H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, a noticeably less power-hungry processor, in multi-thread performance making the i5 a somewhat underwhelming option as far as H-class processors go.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a  low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 45 W. Laptop makers are free to reduce that value slightly, 35 W being the minimum Intel-recommended value, resulting in lower clock speed and lower performance. Either way, an active cooling solution will still be needed to dissipate the heat.

The i5-10500H is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for low, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Xeon W-10885MIntel Core i9-10980HKIntel Core i5-10500H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet LakeIntel Comet Lake
CodenameComet Lake-HComet Lake-HComet Lake-H
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 5300 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 166 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
SocketFCBGA1440FCBGA1440BGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
$583 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - W-10885M
36.5 pt (51%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-10980HK
36.4 pt (50%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10500H
32.9 pt (46%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
6893 Points (6%)
min: 9597     avg: 10605     median: 10590.5 (10%)     max: 11641 Points
min: 6820     avg: 7104     median: 7103.5 (7%)     max: 7387 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1300 Points (55%)
min: 1228     avg: 1277     median: 1287 (55%)     max: 1305 Points
min: 1158     avg: 1160     median: 1159.5 (49%)     max: 1161 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 488     avg: 495.3     median: 495.5 (55%)     max: 502 Points
min: 465     avg: 488.2     median: 489 (54%)     max: 507 Points
min: 446     avg: 448     median: 448 (50%)     max: 450 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2727     avg: 3639     median: 3882.5 (9%)     max: 4065 Points
min: 3526     avg: 3933     median: 3883 (9%)     max: 4487 Points
min: 2842     avg: 2919     median: 2919 (7%)     max: 2996 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1089     avg: 1509     median: 1640 (10%)     max: 1666 Points
min: 1606     avg: 1739     median: 1737 (11%)     max: 1862 Points
min: 1209     avg: 1249     median: 1249 (8%)     max: 1289 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 208     avg: 209.8     median: 210 (63%)     max: 211 Points
min: 198     avg: 206.7     median: 206 (62%)     max: 219 Points
min: 184.5     avg: 186.3     median: 186.3 (56%)     max: 188 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.3 Points (24%)
13.8 Points (18%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (58%)
2.1 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7865 Points (48%)
7109 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44583 Points (32%)
37125 Points (27%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
105.8 s (1%)
281 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
9.1 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7180 Points (11%)
6869 Points (11%)
6194 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 36204     avg: 43315     median: 45696 (26%)     max: 48044 MIPS
min: 43786     avg: 47126     median: 47455 (27%)     max: 49275 MIPS
min: 33075     avg: 33445     median: 33445 (19%)     max: 33815 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5495     avg: 5568     median: 5507 (66%)     max: 5703 MIPS
min: 5081     avg: 5386     median: 5437 (65%)     max: 5542 MIPS
min: 4874     avg: 4886     median: 4885.5 (58%)     max: 4897 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100.1 fps (35%)
98.2 fps (34%)
77.8 fps (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
236.9 fps (55%)
238.5 fps (55%)
227.5 fps (52%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.89     avg: 11.9     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 13.6 fps
min: 12     avg: 13     median: 13 (23%)     max: 14.6 fps
min: 9.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (17%)     max: 9.73 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (0%)
1.1 GB/s (0%)
0.6 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
0.9 GB/s (16%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
10.1 GB/s (26%)
4.1 GB/s (11%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 281     avg: 326.3     median: 286 (2%)     max: 412 Seconds
min: 239     avg: 277.4     median: 279 (2%)     max: 299 Seconds
min: 382     avg: 385.5     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 389 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.551     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.57 sec
min: 0.561     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.596 sec
min: 0.634     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.645 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13490 Points (29%)
min: 13573     avg: 13765     median: 13765 (29%)     max: 13957 Points
11157 Points (24%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
7.8 s (2%)
8.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
17.2 s (1%)
19.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
429.3 s (2%)
449 s (2%)
485.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 54332     avg: 56780     median: 56779.5 (50%)     max: 59227 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13072     avg: 16593     median: 18302 (49%)     max: 18404 Points
min: 13629     avg: 16455     median: 16268 (44%)     max: 19000 Points
min: 11219     avg: 12299     median: 12299 (33%)     max: 13379 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
67714 Points (57%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10772     avg: 13951     median: 14922 (38%)     max: 16159 Points
min: 14150     avg: 15807     median: 16163 (41%)     max: 17016 Points
min: 10881     avg: 11086     median: 11085.5 (28%)     max: 11290 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15118     avg: 19215     median: 20247 (36%)     max: 22279 Points
min: 19789     avg: 21270     median: 21190.5 (38%)     max: 22476 Points
min: 16551     avg: 17052     median: 17051.5 (30%)     max: 17552 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6457     avg: 8161     median: 8812 (37%)     max: 9214 Points
min: 8448     avg: 9352     median: 9439 (40%)     max: 10020 Points
min: 6016     avg: 6390     median: 6389.5 (27%)     max: 6763 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1331     avg: 1339     median: 1340 (57%)     max: 1347 Points
min: 1283     avg: 1339     median: 1347.5 (57%)     max: 1401 Points
min: 1181     avg: 1202     median: 1205.5 (51%)     max: 1214 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6948     avg: 7939     median: 8378 (15%)     max: 8491 Points
min: 7634     avg: 8175     median: 8155.5 (15%)     max: 8666 Points
min: 5550     avg: 6139     median: 6332 (11%)     max: 6340 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1310     avg: 1332     median: 1323 (6%)     max: 1362 Points
min: 1222     avg: 1317     median: 1349 (6%)     max: 1380 Points
1200 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7542     avg: 8126     median: 8295 (26%)     max: 8541 Points
min: 7597     avg: 7969     median: 8010 (25%)     max: 8300 Points
6233 Points (20%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5880     avg: 5899     median: 5892 (59%)     max: 5924 Points
min: 5615     avg: 5935     median: 5971 (60%)     max: 6218 Points
5501 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30737     avg: 32163     median: 32814 (37%)     max: 32939 Points
min: 29927     avg: 31196     median: 30973 (35%)     max: 32688 Points
25696 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5687 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
30205 Points (74%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 728     avg: 736     median: 733 (1%)     max: 746 ms
min: 722     avg: 748     median: 745 (1%)     max: 764 ms
min: 813     avg: 819     median: 818.5 (1%)     max: 824 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
57793 Points (52%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 228     avg: 229.3     median: 229 (48%)     max: 231 Points
min: 232     avg: 242.9     median: 243 (51%)     max: 252 Points
min: 218     avg: 223.5     median: 223.5 (47%)     max: 229 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
150 Watt (26%)
min: 139     avg: 149.5     median: 149.5 (26%)     max: 160 Watt
min: 93.3     avg: 99.2     median: 99.2 (17%)     max: 105 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
152.9 Watt (28%)
min: 147     avg: 170.5     median: 170.5 (31%)     max: 194 Watt
min: 105.9     avg: 115.5     median: 115.5 (21%)     max: 125 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.8 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)
min: 9.05     avg: 10.2     median: 10.2 (8%)     max: 11.4 Points per Watt
min: 10.3     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (8%)     max: 11.4 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10885M → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-10980HK → 102% n=33

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10500H → 83% n=33

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 16. 07:19:09

#0 checking url part for id 12205 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11873 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13217 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.036s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.036s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12205 +0.02s ... 0.056s

#8 got single benchmarks 12205 +0.019s ... 0.074s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11873 +0.016s ... 0.091s

#10 got single benchmarks 11873 +0.065s ... 0.156s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13217 +0.017s ... 0.173s

#12 got single benchmarks 13217 +0.016s ... 0.189s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.189s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.457s ... 0.646s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.646s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)