Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon W-10885M vs Intel Core i7-2700K vs Intel Core i5-10300H

Intel Xeon W-10885M

► remove from comparison Intel W-10885M

The Intel Xeon W-10885M is a high-end processor for workstation laptops with eight cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.4 and 5.3 GHz and can execute up to sixteen threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10885M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Intel Core i9-10885H

Performance

The performance of the W-10885M should be slightly above the older Core i9-9980HK top model, thanks to the potential higher single core turbo. Thanks to the 8 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run very good on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration. At the time of announcement, the Intel Xeon W-10885M is the second fastest Comet Lake-H CPU behind the Core i9-10980HK.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9880H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all. The P-variant uses professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-2700K

► remove from comparison

850 - 1350 HD Graphics 3000

Im Vergleich zum 2600K mit höherer Taktrate

kein VT-d, vPro und Trusted Execution

Intel Core i5-10300H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-10300H

The Intel Core i5-10300H is a fast processor for laptops with four cores based on the Comet Lake-H series (4th generation of Skylake architecture). The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.5 GHz (up to 4.2 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the predecessor, the Core i5-9300H from 2019, the 10300H is clocked slightly higher (+100 MHz Base, +400 MHz Boost) and supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM.

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Core i5-10300H supports no vPro, TXT or SIPP. These business features are available in the faster Core i5-10400H (2.6 - 4.6 GHz) that was released at a later date.

Performance

The average 10300H in our database matches the AMD Ryzen 5 3550H in multi-thread performance. While not a poor result per se, it is indicative of an entry-level H-class CPU that is unlikely to meet the needs of hardcore gamers, professional videographers and similar clientele.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i5-9300H. As a low-end solution it will probably only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power consumption

The Core i5 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop makers are free to reduce slightly, 35 W being the lowest Intel-recommended value. Doing so would result in lower clock speeds and lower performance. Either way, a proper cooling solution is a must for a CPU like this.

The i5-10300H is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for lower-than-average, as of late 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Xeon W-10885MIntel Core i7-2700KIntel Core i5-10300H
CodenameComet Lake-HSandy BridgeComet Lake-H
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Comet Lake
Series: Comet Lake Comet Lake-H
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-2700K « 3.5 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-2600K3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10980HK2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2400 - 5300 MHz3500 - 3900 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 84 / 8
TDP45 Watt95 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm32 nm14 nm
SocketFCBGA1440LGA1155BGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR4-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s, MMX, BMI2, AES-NI, SSE4.1, ABM, VMX, EIST, RDRAND, SSE4.2, TM1, RDSEED, SSE, AVX, FMA, SMEP, TM2, SSE2, AVX2, ADX, SMAP, Hyper-Threading, SGX, SSE3, Turbo, SSSE3, MPX, SST
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 3000 (850 - 1350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors995 Million
Die Size216 mm2
max. Temp.72.6 °C100 °C
$332 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - W-10885M
33 pt (55%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-10300H
29.7 pt (49%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
68.2 Points (38%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
331 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
6893 Points (6%)
min: 4621     avg: 5132     median: 5106 (5%)     max: 5668 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1300 Points (55%)
min: 1095     avg: 1126     median: 1136 (48%)     max: 1147 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 488     avg: 495.3     median: 495.5 (55%)     max: 502 Points
min: 312     avg: 443.2     median: 454 (50%)     max: 470 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2727     avg: 3639     median: 3882.5 (9%)     max: 4065 Points
min: 1397     avg: 2046     median: 2117 (5%)     max: 2240 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1089     avg: 1509     median: 1640 (10%)     max: 1666 Points
min: 536     avg: 825     median: 892 (6%)     max: 921 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 208     avg: 209.8     median: 210 (59%)     max: 211 Points
min: 108     avg: 174     median: 186 (52%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.3 Points (24%)
7 Points (9%)
min: 9.87     avg: 10     median: 10.1 (13%)     max: 10.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.4 Points (56%)
min: 2.05     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (51%)     max: 2.17 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7865 Points (48%)
4967 Points (30%)
min: 6867     avg: 7056     median: 7130 (43%)     max: 7170 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44583 Points (32%)
19675 Points (14%)
min: 26994     avg: 27496     median: 27692 (20%)     max: 27801 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 2700K +
23767 Points (15%)
min: 35899     avg: 36042     median: 36042 (23%)     max: 36185 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 2700K +
6248 Points (8%)
min: 9326     avg: 9339     median: 9338.5 (11%)     max: 9351 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
105.8 s (1%)
219.5 s (3%)
215.2 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.6 s (1%)
7.2 s (1%)
7.1 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 2700K +
214.6 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 2700K +
7.3 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7180 Points (11%)
3537 Points (6%)
4825 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 36204     avg: 43315     median: 45696 (26%)     max: 48044 MIPS
min: 15146     avg: 23295     median: 24158 (14%)     max: 24841 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5495     avg: 5568     median: 5507 (65%)     max: 5703 MIPS
min: 2945     avg: 4704     median: 4896 (58%)     max: 4956 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100.1 fps (33%)
37.5 fps (13%)
53.3 fps (18%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
236.9 fps (55%)
147 fps (34%)
190.2 fps (44%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.89     avg: 11.9     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 13.6 fps
min: 6.13     avg: 7.1     median: 7.3 (13%)     max: 7.78 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
0.3 GB/s (10%)
0.4 GB/s (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
0.6 GB/s (10%)
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
3.5 GB/s (9%)
3.1 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
962 Seconds (12%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 281     avg: 326.3     median: 286 (2%)     max: 412 Seconds
min: 478.9     avg: 515     median: 515.5 (4%)     max: 555 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.551     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (12%)     max: 0.57 sec
min: 0.625     avg: 0.7     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 1.088 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13490 Points (29%)
min: 6792     avg: 6837     median: 6837 (15%)     max: 6882 Points
min: 9731     avg: 9744     median: 9744 (21%)     max: 9757 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
9.8 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
22.1 s (1%)
19.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
429.3 s (2%)
552 s (2%)
516 s (2%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 2700K +
min: 140800     avg: 141285     median: 141285 (67%)     max: 141770 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 2700K +
min: 85000     avg: 86320     median: 86320 (66%)     max: 87640 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 2700K +
7.6 Points (97%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 2700K +
24459 Points (19%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13072     avg: 16593     median: 18302 (46%)     max: 18404 Points
8552 Points (22%)
min: 8554     avg: 9719     median: 9884.5 (25%)     max: 10909 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 58736     avg: 60992     median: 61113 (50%)     max: 62933 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 58462     avg: 61155     median: 61387 (50%)     max: 62548 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 38284     avg: 60059     median: 63707 (53%)     max: 63995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10772     avg: 13951     median: 14922 (38%)     max: 16159 Points
min: 8220     avg: 8936     median: 9017.5 (23%)     max: 9305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 15118     avg: 19215     median: 20247 (36%)     max: 22279 Points
min: 12298     avg: 12919     median: 13016 (23%)     max: 13267 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6457     avg: 8161     median: 8812 (37%)     max: 9214 Points
min: 3772     avg: 4678     median: 4684 (20%)     max: 5600 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
1599 Points (41%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
5340 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1331     avg: 1339     median: 1340 (52%)     max: 1347 Points
min: 703     avg: 1166     median: 1203.5 (47%)     max: 1241 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6948     avg: 7939     median: 8378 (15%)     max: 8491 Points
min: 2783     avg: 4351     median: 4478 (8%)     max: 4728 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1310     avg: 1332     median: 1323 (6%)     max: 1362 Points
min: 1121     avg: 1175     median: 1172.5 (5%)     max: 1234 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7542     avg: 8126     median: 8295 (26%)     max: 8541 Points
min: 3887     avg: 4333     median: 4365 (14%)     max: 4713 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5880     avg: 5899     median: 5892 (59%)     max: 5924 Points
min: 4844     avg: 5198     median: 5199 (52%)     max: 5549 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 30737     avg: 32163     median: 32814 (33%)     max: 32939 Points
min: 15448     avg: 17203     median: 17278 (17%)     max: 18807 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
12111 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 728     avg: 736     median: 733 (1%)     max: 746 ms
min: 812     avg: 872     median: 824 (1%)     max: 1366 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 36854     avg: 47282     median: 48896 (41%)     max: 51952 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 228     avg: 229.3     median: 229 (42%)     max: 231 Points
min: 134     avg: 206.2     median: 210.5 (39%)     max: 231 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
150 Watt (26%)
min: 76.8     avg: 95.8     median: 95.3 (16%)     max: 112 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
152.9 Watt (28%)
min: 75.3     avg: 85.7     median: 85.8 (16%)     max: 93 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)
min: 9.51     avg: 10.4     median: 10.5 (8%)     max: 11.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10885M → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-2700K → 51% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-10300H → 63% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 02. 10:57:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12205 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3008 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11706 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733133437s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:18:52 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12205 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 12205 +0.007s ... 0.019s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3008 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#11 got single benchmarks 3008 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 11706 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#13 got single benchmarks 11706 +0.025s ... 0.053s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.112s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.112s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)