, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core vs Vivante GC800

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

► remove from comparison Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

The Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core is an integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. It supports Android, Windows Mobile 6, Windows CE and Linux and the standards OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenGL 2.1, OpenVG 1.1, and DirectX 11 (9_3). The chip is can be clocked with up to 600 MHz (28nm LP) or 800 MHz (28nm HPM). The theoretical calculating power of the GPU is 50 Mio triangles / s, 650 Mio pixels / s and 12 GFLOPS (according to cnx-software.com). According to Vivante however the GC1000 is capable of 345 to 460 Mio triangles /s and 11 to 15 GFLOPS.

Vivante GC800

► remove from comparison

The Vivante GC800 is an integrated graphics card for ARM based (e.g. Rockchip RK291x) and MIPS based (e.g. Actions ATM701x) SoCs. It offers a single VEC-4 (or in other words four VEC-1) unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 2.0 (optional ES 3.0), OpenGL 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, DirectX 9_3 (optional) and OpenCL 1.2 (optional). The clock rate can be choosen between 315 and 575 MHz in 40nm designs and up to 800 MHz in 28nm designs.

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-CoreVivante GC800
ManufacturerVivanteVivante
Series
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 compare @ 0.13 GHz
PXP compare
unknown compare
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 compare @ 0.13 GHz
PXP compare
unknown compare
Pipelines2 - unified1 - unified
Core Speed600 / 800 MHz315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynoyes
DirectXDirectX 9_3
Date of Announcement12.09.2013 01.01.2012
technology40/28 nm
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.vivantecorp.com/p_mvr.html#GC...
CPU in GC800GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK29181 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2237     avg: 2329     median: 2373 (0%)     max: 2377 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 997     avg: 1177     median: 1207.5 (0%)     max: 1295 Points
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen
100%
1 GC800 +
13 fps (2%)
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD
100%
1 GC800 +
19 fps (32%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.5     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (0%)     max: 3.3 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 5.4     avg: 5.9     median: 5.7 (0%)     max: 6.7 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
0 fps (0%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
1651 Points (57%)
1899 Points (66%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
4981 Points (44%)
3546 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
5503 Points (57%)
4199 Points (44%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 13.87     avg: 18     median: 20.1 (33%)     max: 20.09 fps
29.1 fps (48%)
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 1.246     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (8%)     max: 2.262 fps
59.8 fps (89%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1549     avg: 1910     median: 1798 (2%)     max: 2667 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 682     avg: 707     median: 688 (2%)     max: 753 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 1832     avg: 2304     median: 2322 (50%)     max: 2758
min: 1254     avg: 1911     median: 1259 (27%)     max: 3219

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC800 → 97% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 25. 05:46:13

#0 checking url part for id 4572 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3156 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 24 Jul 2021 17:21:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.093s ... 0.093s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.093s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.093s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4572 +0.028s ... 0.121s

#8 got single benchmarks 4572 +0.01s ... 0.131s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3156 +0s ... 0.131s

#10 got single benchmarks 3156 +0.006s ... 0.137s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.137s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.141s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.142s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.148s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.148s

#16 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.151s

#17 return log +0.055s ... 0.207s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)