Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core vs Intel Extreme Graphics 2

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

► remove Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

The Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core is an integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. It supports Android, Windows Mobile 6, Windows CE and Linux and the standards OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenGL 2.1, OpenVG 1.1, and DirectX 11 (9_3). The chip is can be clocked with up to 600 MHz (28nm LP) or 800 MHz (28nm HPM). The theoretical calculating power of the GPU is 50 Mio triangles / s, 650 Mio pixels / s and 12 GFLOPS (according to cnx-software.com). According to Vivante however the GC1000 is capable of 345 to 460 Mio triangles /s and 11 to 15 GFLOPS.

Intel Extreme Graphics 2

► remove Intel Extreme Graphics 2

The Intel Extreme Graphics 2 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip with shared memory on the Intel 852 / 855 GM, GME, GMV chipsets for Centrino, Pentium 4 and Celeron based laptops. The 3D performance is very low and therefore the graphics card is not suited for 3D games. For example the 3D Mark 05 does not start due to the lack of pixel shader support. Furthermore, the card does not support Windows Aero in Vista and Windows 7.

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-CoreIntel Extreme Graphics 2
ManufacturerVivanteIntel
Series
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 600 / 800 MHz
GC800 (compare) 1 @ 315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 133 MHz
PXP (compare)
unknown (compare)
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 600 / 800 MHz
GC800 (compare) 1 @ 315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 133 MHz
PXP (compare)
unknown (compare)
2 -
Core600 / 800 MHz133 MHz
nono
DirectXDirectX 9_3DirectX 8
Introduced12.09.2013 03.12.2003
CodenameMontara
Memorymit Hauptspeicher geteilt (shared)
Technology150 nm
FeaturesGDI und DirectX / DirectDraw mit Overlay Unterstützung, XFree86, XAA, Xv Unterstützung für Linux, Multi-Monitor Unterstützung, Dual Monitor Support, bis zu 96 MB vom Hauptspeicher (dynamisch)
Manufacturerhttp://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/emb...

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 2237     avg: 2329     median: 2373 (0%)     max: 2377 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 997     avg: 1176.8     median: 1207 (0%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 1912     avg: 2309.8     median: 2255 (0%)     max: 2694 Points
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 2214     avg: 2457     median: 2457 (3%)     max: 2700 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 115     avg: 115.5     median: 115 (0%)     max: 116 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
0 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 + Intel Extreme Graphics 2
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
0 fps (0%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Off-screen 1024x2048
1651 Points (57%)
AnTuTu 3DRating
4981 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v3 - GPU
5503 (57%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Taiji Free
min: 13     avg: 18     median: 20 (33%)     max: 20 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Off-Screen
min: 1     avg: 1.8     median: 1 (5%)     max: 2 fps
NenaMark2
min: 38     avg: 48.8     median: 49 (73%)     max: 58 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1549     avg: 1909.8     median: 1798 (9%)     max: 2667 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 682     avg: 707.2     median: 688 (11%)     max: 753 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Gaming Index
min: 1832     avg: 2304     median: 2322 (50%)     max: 2758 points

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Extreme Graphics 2 → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)