ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:9963

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core vs Intel Extreme Graphics 2 vs
Notebookcheck Logo

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core vs Intel Extreme Graphics 2 vs

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

► remove from comparison Vivante Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core

The Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core is an integrated graphics card for ARM based SoCs. It supports Android, Windows Mobile 6, Windows CE and Linux and the standards OpenGL ES 2.0, OpenGL 2.1, OpenVG 1.1, and DirectX 11 (9_3). The chip is can be clocked with up to 600 MHz (28nm LP) or 800 MHz (28nm HPM). The theoretical calculating power of the GPU is 50 Mio triangles / s, 650 Mio pixels / s and 12 GFLOPS (according to cnx-software.com). According to Vivante however the GC1000 is capable of 345 to 460 Mio triangles /s and 11 to 15 GFLOPS.

Intel Extreme Graphics 2

► remove from comparison Intel Extreme Graphics 2

The Intel Extreme Graphics 2 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip with shared memory on the Intel 852 / 855 GM, GME, GMV chipsets for Centrino, Pentium 4 and Celeron based laptops. The 3D performance is very low and therefore the graphics card is not suited for 3D games. For example the 3D Mark 05 does not start due to the lack of pixel shader support. Furthermore, the card does not support Windows Aero in Vista and Windows 7.

Vivante GC1000+ Dual-CoreIntel Extreme Graphics 2
Series
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
Pipelines2 - unified
Core Speed600 / 800 MHz133 MHz
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9_3, OpenGL 2.1 / ES 2.0DirectX 8
Date of Announcement12.09.2013 03.12.2003
CodenameMontara
ArchitectureGen. 2
technology150 nm
FeaturesGDI und DirectX / DirectDraw mit Overlay Unterstützung, XFree86, XAA, Xv Unterstützung für Linux, Multi-Monitor Unterstützung, Dual Monitor Support, bis zu 96 MB vom Hauptspeicher (dynamisch)
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.intel.com
CPU in GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2237     avg: 2329     median: 2373 (0%)     max: 2377 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 997     avg: 1177     median: 1207.5 (0%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 2214     avg: 2457     median: 2457 (3%)     max: 2700 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 115     avg: 115.5     median: 115.5 (0%)     max: 116 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
0 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + Intel Extreme Graphics 2
3DMark 06
0 Points (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.5     avg: 2.8     median: 2.7 (0%)     max: 3.3 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
1651 Points (57%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
4981 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
5503 Points (57%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 13.87     avg: 18     median: 20.1 (33%)     max: 20.09 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 1.246     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (8%)     max: 2.262 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1549     avg: 1910     median: 1798 (2%)     max: 2667 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 682     avg: 707     median: 688 (1%)     max: 753 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 1832     avg: 2304     median: 2322 (50%)     max: 2758 Points

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Extreme Graphics 2 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 29. 12:08:23

#0 checking url part for id 4572 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 54 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9963 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.158s ... 0.159s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.159s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.159s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4572 +0.036s ... 0.195s

#9 got single benchmarks 4572 +0.013s ... 0.208s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 54 +0.002s ... 0.209s

#11 got single benchmarks 54 +0.032s ... 0.241s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9963 +0.001s ... 0.243s

#13 got single benchmarks 9963 +0.004s ... 0.247s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.247s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.268s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.033s ... 0.301s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.303s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.316s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.316s

#20 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.319s

#21 return log +0.002s ... 0.321s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)