Notebookcheck Logo

AMD V-Series V140 vs AMD V-Series V120 vs AMD V-Series V160

AMD V-Series V140

► remove from comparison

The AMD V-Series V140 (sometimes also called Sempron V140) is a single core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Champlain core, which should use a K10 architecture. As the dual core Athlon II P and N CPUs, the V140 offers only a 64 Bit FPU (Floating Point Unit). Therefore, the CPU also features an integrated DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to the slower (Atom counterpart) AMD V105, the V140 offers a much higher clock speed and a faster HyperTransport 3.0 link (with 1600 MHZ - HT3200). The performance should be on a level with a 2.2 GHz Celeron single core processor.

Specified at 25 Watt TDP, the processor can be used in notebooks with screens of 13 inches and up.

AMD V-Series V120

► remove from comparison

The AMD V-Series V120 (sometimes also called Sempron V120) is a single core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Champlain core, which should use a K10 architecture. As the dual core Athlon II P and N CPUs, the V120 offers only a 64 Bit FPU (Floating Point Unit). Therefore, the CPU also features an integrated DDR3 memory controller.

Compared to the slower (Atom counterpart) AMD V105, the V120 offers a much higher clock speed and a faster HyperTransport 3.0 link (with 1600 MHZ - HT3200). The performance should be on a level with a 1.3 GHz clocked Core 2 Duo CULV processor.

Specified at 25 Watt TDP, the processor can be used in notebooks with screens of 13 inches and up.

AMD V-Series V160

► remove from comparison

The AMD V-Series V160 (sometimes also called Sempron V160) is a single core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Champlain core, which should use a K10 architecture. As the dual core Athlon II P and N CPUs, the V160 offers only a 64 Bit FPU (Floating Point Unit). Furthermore, the CPU also features an integrated DDR3 memory controller (up to 1066).

Compared to the slower (Atom counterpart) AMD V105, the V160 offers a much higher clock speed and a faster HyperTransport 3.0 link (with 1600 MHZ - HT3200). The performance should be on a level with a 2.2 GHz Celeron single core processor.

Specified at 25 Watt TDP, the processor can be used in notebooks with screens of 13 inches and up.

ModelAMD V-Series V140AMD V-Series V120AMD V-Series V160
SeriesAMD V-SeriesAMD V-SeriesAMD V-Series
CodenameChamplainChamplainChamplain
Series: V-Series Champlain
AMD V-Series V1602.4 GHz1 / 1
» AMD V-Series V1402.3 GHz1 / 1
AMD V-Series V1202.2 GHz1 / 1
AMD V-Series V1602.4 GHz1 / 1
AMD V-Series V1402.3 GHz1 / 1
» AMD V-Series V1202.2 GHz1 / 1
» AMD V-Series V1602.4 GHz1 / 1
AMD V-Series V1402.3 GHz1 / 1
AMD V-Series V1202.2 GHz1 / 1
Clock2300 MHz2200 MHz2400 MHz
FSB320032003200
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP25 Watt25 Watt25 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm45 nm
SocketS1S1S1
FeaturesIntegrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationIntegrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationIntegrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD V-Series V120

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 V140 +
0.6 Points (1%)
97%
1 V120 +
0.6 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 V140 +
min: 1902     avg: 1913     median: 1912.5 (17%)     max: 1923 Points
98%
1 V120 +
min: 1858     avg: 1879     median: 1874 (17%)     max: 1905 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 V120 +
1874 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 V120 +
2147 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 V140 +
2225 Points (14%)
96%
1 V120 +
min: 2144     avg: 2146     median: 2145.5 (13%)     max: 2147 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 V140 +
min: 2096     avg: 2116     median: 2116 (25%)     max: 2136 s
99%
1 V120 +
2210 s (26%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 V140 +
68.3 s (14%)
100%
1 V120 +
69.3 s (14%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 V120 +
72 s (38%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 V140 +
min: 987     avg: 990     median: 989.5 (2%)     max: 992 Points
96%
1 V120 +
min: 951     avg: 953     median: 952.5 (2%)     max: 954 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 V140 +
min: 35     avg: 35.2     median: 35.2 (8%)     max: 35.4 s
100%
1 V120 +
min: 34.9     avg: 35.5     median: 35.5 (8%)     max: 36 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 V140 +
min: 80.3     avg: 80.7     median: 80.7 (3%)     max: 81 s
100%
1 V120 +
83 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 V140 +
1870 s (8%)
100%
1 V120 +
1948 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 V140 +
7830 MIPS (4%)
138%
1 V120 +
10809 MIPS (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 V140 +
7120 MFLOPS (5%)
48%
1 V120 +
3434 MFLOPS (3%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 V140 +
2901 Points (18%)
102%
1 V120 +
min: 2963     avg: 2964     median: 2963.5 (19%)     max: 2964 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 V140 +
4.3 Points (55%)
100%
1 V120 +
4.3 Points (55%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 V120 +
1687 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks AMD V-Series V140 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD V-Series V120 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 16. 00:44:44

#0 checking url part for id 1311 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 951 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1528 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#11 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#12 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 1311 +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 got single benchmarks 1311 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 951 +0s ... 0.014s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#18 got single benchmarks 951 +0.007s ... 0.022s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 1528 +0s ... 0.022s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#21 got single benchmarks 1528 +0.006s ... 0.028s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.03s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.038s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.04s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#63 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.042s

#64 return log +0s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)