Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs AMD Ryzen 7 H 255

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The APU comes with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter run at significantly lower clock speeds than the former.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 370 supports LPDDR5x-8000 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the IPC improvement, we expect 4 Zen 5 cores combined with 8 Zen 5c cores to perform about as well as 16 Zen 4 cores meaning there is a real chance of the HX 370 dethroning the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We'll make sure to update this section once we get our hands on a laptop powered by the HX 370.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer right now. It features 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. We expect the graphics adapter to deliver gaming performance good enough for playing 2023 and 2024 games in 1080p (Low detail settings).

Naturally, the 890M is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 370 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 H 255

► remove from comparison Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X CPU

The Ryzen 7 H 255 is a chip from the Hawk Point family that is only available in China. The chip is identical to the older Ryzen 7 8745H and has 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) that run at up to 4.9 GHz, together with the still quite powerful Radeon 780M iGPU. An NPU for AI acceleration is not installed / activated.

The only difference between the 8745H and the 8745HS is the slightly higher standard wattage of the former, which may lead to slightly higher clock rates.

Performance

We expect this Zen 4 architecture processor to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX (8 Zen 4 cores, 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz), meaning its multi-thread performance is slightly better than that of the Core Ultra 9 185H but a few percentage points behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and features

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 offers AVX512 support along with other improvements such as larger caches/registers/buffers across the board. Otherwise, the 8745H has 16MB of L3 cache and a fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). There are 20 PCI-Express 4 lanes for connecting devices such as NVMe SSDs (1.97 GB/s per lane) and graphics cards; USB 4 / Thunderbolt support is also on board. Please note that the APU is not overclockable and cannot be replaced by the user. It is permanently soldered to the motherboard (FP7r2 or FP8 socket interfaces).

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,600 MHz) can drive 4 monitors simultaneously with a resolution of up to SUHD 4320p. Hardware encoding and hardware decoding of the most common video codecs (AV1, AVC, HEVC) is also no problem. As far as games are concerned, many titles can still be played in 1080p at the beginning of 2025, even if most settings are set to Low or Low.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (standard TDP) of 35W to 54W, giving system manufacturers the choice of either improving battery life or making the system they are developing faster. In any case, an active cooling solution is a must for a notebook or mini PC equipped with this APU.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 155HAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
CodenameMeteor Lake-HStrix Point-HX (Zen 5/5c)Hawk Point-H (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HAMD Strix / Gorgon PointAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-H (Zen 4)
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2553.8 - 4.95 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745H3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 « 3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4800 MHz2000 - 5100 MHz3800 - 4900 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
8 / 16
8 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt45 Watt
Technology7 nm4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.110 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2049FP8FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2600 MHz)
NPU / AI11 TOPS INT850 TOPS INT816 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache960 KB512 KB
L2 Cache12 MB8 MB
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Chip AI80 TOPS INT838 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
37.5 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 7 H 255
39.3 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 96     avg: 102.6     median: 102.3 (51%)     max: 108 Points
min: 113.6     avg: 117     median: 116.9 (58%)     max: 121 Points
min: 100.4     avg: 100.8     median: 100.8 (50%)     max: 101.1 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 323     avg: 776     median: 789 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
min: 621     avg: 1085     median: 1139 (21%)     max: 1299 Points
min: 905     avg: 914     median: 914 (17%)     max: 923 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9769     avg: 14965     median: 15028 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
min: 10435     avg: 20658     median: 21761 (20%)     max: 23902 Points
min: 15871     avg: 16137     median: 16136.5 (15%)     max: 16402 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1496     avg: 1726     median: 1743 (71%)     max: 1815 Points
min: 1921     avg: 2011     median: 2018 (82%)     max: 2049 Points
min: 1697     avg: 1708     median: 1707.5 (69%)     max: 1718 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 601     avg: 665     median: 670.5 (73%)     max: 696 Points
min: 737     avg: 787     median: 791 (86%)     max: 804 Points
min: 660     avg: 669     median: 668.5 (73%)     max: 677 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3798     avg: 5795     median: 5762.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
min: 6449     avg: 8379     median: 8711 (21%)     max: 9280 Points
min: 6255     avg: 6368     median: 6367.5 (16%)     max: 6480 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1932     avg: 2449     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2880 Points
min: 2498.13     avg: 3234     median: 3409.5 (22%)     max: 3551 Points
min: 2514     avg: 2551     median: 2551 (16%)     max: 2588 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 249.5     median: 255 (71%)     max: 268 Points
min: 188.8     avg: 292.1     median: 306.5 (85%)     max: 315 Points
min: 266     avg: 271     median: 271 (75%)     max: 276 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.11     avg: 30.5     median: 30.7 (40%)     max: 33.49 Points
min: 34.85     avg: 38.7     median: 39.2 (51%)     max: 41.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.77     avg: 3     median: 3 (72%)     max: 3.13 Points
min: 3.59     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (88%)     max: 3.7 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8808     avg: 9492     median: 9619.5 (58%)     max: 9919 Points
min: 8437     avg: 8624     median: 8647 (52%)     max: 8797 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 50589     avg: 56540     median: 57550 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
min: 48553     avg: 53459     median: 53467 (39%)     max: 56689 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 67393     median: 80420 (51%)     max: 95005 Points
min: 89081     avg: 97282     median: 97491 (62%)     max: 103657 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12270     avg: 30347     median: 13508.5 (16%)     max: 82102 Points
min: 15381     avg: 15694     median: 15747.5 (19%)     max: 15935 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 92.544     avg: 146.2     median: 139.6 (2%)     max: 206.526 s
min: 50.536     avg: 80.4     median: 82 (1%)     max: 103.515 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.523     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.041 s
min: 2.701     avg: 3.2     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 4.236 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6137     avg: 6921     median: 6911.5 (11%)     max: 7723 Points
min: 4008     avg: 4488     median: 4583.5 (7%)     max: 4859 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 41739     avg: 59108     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70254 MIPS
min: 66154     avg: 78580     median: 80572.5 (46%)     max: 84735 MIPS
min: 68893     avg: 69340     median: 69340 (40%)     max: 69787 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4594     avg: 5330     median: 5398 (64%)     max: 5621 MIPS
min: 5859     avg: 6172     median: 6161 (73%)     max: 6497 MIPS
min: 6237     avg: 6249     median: 6249 (74%)     max: 6261 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 120.65     avg: 136.4     median: 135.4 (3%)     max: 154.15 fps
min: 144.9     avg: 167.6     median: 169.6 (4%)     max: 185.1 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 282.57     avg: 302.1     median: 300.5 (8%)     max: 325 fps
min: 300     avg: 312.1     median: 306.3 (8%)     max: 330 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
min: 20.3     avg: 25.4     median: 26.2 (46%)     max: 28.7 fps
min: 19.9     avg: 20.2     median: 20.2 (35%)     max: 20.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (49%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (47%)     max: 2.8 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 9.3     avg: 10.3     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
min: 15.1     avg: 15.6     median: 15.3 (40%)     max: 16.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 296     avg: 413.3     median: 380 (5%)     max: 692 Seconds
min: 208     avg: 237.5     median: 221 (3%)     max: 306 Seconds
min: 315     avg: 319.5     median: 319.5 (4%)     max: 324 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 175     avg: 232.5     median: 220 (2%)     max: 381 Seconds
min: 139     avg: 155.4     median: 148 (1%)     max: 192 Seconds
min: 194     avg: 198.5     median: 198.5 (1%)     max: 203 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.53 sec
min: 0.3892     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.529 sec
min: 0.4587     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 12066     avg: 12936     median: 12712.5 (21%)     max: 14729 Points
min: 13761     avg: 16316     median: 16484.5 (28%)     max: 17466 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 7.046     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.087 s
min: 8.224     avg: 8.4     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 8.482 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.701     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 17.277 s
min: 17.504     avg: 18.5     median: 17.8 (1%)     max: 22.248 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 394.754     avg: 413.2     median: 400.3 (2%)     max: 444.482 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 61131     avg: 65940     median: 63514 (49%)     max: 74620 Points
min: 66119     avg: 73024     median: 73291 (56%)     max: 77565 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 6531     avg: 18376     median: 19092.5 (47%)     max: 23779 Points
min: 17129     avg: 20670     median: 20920 (52%)     max: 24599 Points
min: 20839     avg: 21465     median: 21465 (53%)     max: 22091 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 53255     avg: 77249     median: 77292.5 (63%)     max: 93608 Points
min: 50952     avg: 65051     median: 66225 (54%)     max: 80129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66925     avg: 75901     median: 72861.5 (59%)     max: 90957 Points
min: 50955     avg: 66706     median: 67159 (54%)     max: 80215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84880     avg: 88438     median: 88437.5 (71%)     max: 91995 Points
min: 48351     avg: 66502     median: 68034 (55%)     max: 77813 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 7073     avg: 15332     median: 15194 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
min: 16960     avg: 19634     median: 19853.5 (50%)     max: 21349 Points
min: 19827     avg: 19842     median: 19842 (50%)     max: 19857 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5249     avg: 22618     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
min: 24918     avg: 30209     median: 30474.5 (54%)     max: 33844 Points
min: 27094     avg: 27266     median: 27266 (49%)     max: 27438 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3922     avg: 9000     median: 9454.5 (40%)     max: 12145 Points
min: 8866     avg: 10515     median: 10597 (45%)     max: 12293 Points
min: 10169     avg: 10421     median: 10421 (44%)     max: 10673 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 1901     avg: 2377     median: 2409 (56%)     max: 2473 Points
min: 2780     avg: 2886     median: 2880.5 (67%)     max: 2965 Points
min: 2545     avg: 2546     median: 2545.5 (59%)     max: 2546 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 7732     avg: 12275     median: 12385 (42%)     max: 13656 Points
min: 11973     avg: 14644     median: 14996 (51%)     max: 16311 Points
min: 12515     avg: 12670     median: 12670 (43%)     max: 12825 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2167     avg: 2261     median: 2280.5 (72%)     max: 2314 Points
min: 2645     avg: 2747     median: 2742.5 (87%)     max: 2844 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 10787     avg: 11569     median: 11714 (48%)     max: 12061 Points
min: 12289     avg: 13925     median: 14281.5 (59%)     max: 15017 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1462     avg: 1751     median: 1761.5 (59%)     max: 1824 Points
min: 1957     avg: 2088     median: 2096 (70%)     max: 2175 Points
min: 1810     avg: 1845     median: 1845 (62%)     max: 1880 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10017     avg: 12016     median: 12183.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
min: 11394     avg: 14348     median: 14516 (26%)     max: 16322 Points
min: 11604     avg: 11609     median: 11609 (21%)     max: 11614 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1556     avg: 1678     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
min: 1827     avg: 1939     median: 1942 (8%)     max: 2041 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11112     avg: 11906     median: 12025 (38%)     max: 12530 Points
min: 12962     avg: 14339     median: 14353 (45%)     max: 15009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6559     avg: 6879     median: 6927 (69%)     max: 7141 Points
min: 7480     avg: 8024     median: 7832 (78%)     max: 8628 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 39509     avg: 43123     median: 43897 (43%)     max: 46412 Points
min: 42842     avg: 53453     median: 54787 (54%)     max: 57060 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 416.4     avg: 541     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
min: 307.8     avg: 436.3     median: 434 (1%)     max: 503 ms
min: 566     avg: 572     median: 571.5 (1%)     max: 577 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 77142     avg: 88549     median: 89268 (58%)     max: 97162 Points
min: 64079     avg: 112489     median: 122618 (80%)     max: 125813 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 166.4     avg: 251.8     median: 255 (63%)     max: 309 Points
min: 210     avg: 256.3     median: 256.5 (64%)     max: 345 Points
245 Points (61%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 213     avg: 276.5     median: 278.5 (47%)     max: 299 Points
min: 252     avg: 308.1     median: 309.5 (52%)     max: 363 Points
min: 290     avg: 295     median: 295 (49%)     max: 300 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1366     avg: 1663     median: 1685.5 (59%)     max: 1903 Points
min: 1344     avg: 1782     median: 1787 (63%)     max: 2040 Points
min: 1769     avg: 1780     median: 1780 (62%)     max: 1791 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.1     avg: 74.8     median: 72.8 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
min: 45.6     avg: 89.3     median: 90.8 (16%)     max: 133.7 Watt
min: 81.9     avg: 85.5     median: 85.5 (15%)     max: 89 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.9     avg: 89.4     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
min: 46.3     avg: 93.3     median: 99.5 (18%)     max: 130.3 Watt
min: 78.4     avg: 79.9     median: 79.9 (15%)     max: 81.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.42     avg: 7.2     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 24.2 Watt
min: 3.66     avg: 8.5     median: 7.4 (5%)     max: 19.6 Watt
min: 7.23     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (6%)     max: 10 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 2.83     avg: 8     median: 7.8 (6%)     max: 18.5 Watt
min: 6.31     avg: 9.5     median: 9.2 (7%)     max: 12.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 17.7     avg: 30.9     median: 28.6 (21%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt
min: 26.9     avg: 36.6     median: 33.4 (25%)     max: 54.9 Points per Watt
min: 30.9     avg: 32     median: 32 (24%)     max: 33 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 100% n=26

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 → 127% n=26

AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 → 108% n=26

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.35
log 12. 20:42:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17543 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 19847 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1773344561s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Mar 2026 10:47:11 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.056s ... 0.068s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17543 +0.004s ... 0.073s

#11 got single benchmarks 17543 +0.036s ... 0.108s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 19847 +0.005s ... 0.113s

#13 got single benchmarks 19847 +0.006s ... 0.119s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.119s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.096s ... 0.215s

#16 return log +0.122s ... 0.337s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)